SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Piotr Hajlasz

Publications and source records attributed to Piotr Hajlasz.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

A bridge between Dubovitskii - Federer theorems and the coarea formula

The Morse-Sard theorem requires that a mapping $v:R^n \to R^m$ is of class $C^k$, $k>n-m$. In 1957 Dubovitski\uı generalized this result by proving that almost all level sets for a $C^k$ mapping have $H^s$-negligible intersection with its critical set, where $s=\max(n-m-k+1,0)$. Here the critical set, or $m$-critical set is defined as $Z_{v,m} = \{ x \in R^n : {\rm rank} \nabla v(x) < m \}$. Another generalization was obtained independently by Dubovitski\uı and Federer in 1966, namely for $C^k$ mappings $v:R^n\to R^d$ and integers $m\le d$ they proved that the set of $m$-critical values $v(Z_{v,m})$ is $H^{b}$-negligible for $b= m-1+\frac{n-m+1}{k}$. They also established the sharpness of these results within the $C^k$ category. Here we prove that Dubovitski\uı's theorem can be generalized to the case of continuous mappings of the Sobolev-Lorentz class $W^{k}_{p,1}(R^n,R^d )$, $p=\frac{n}k$ (this is the minimal integrability assumption that guarantees the continuity of mappings). In this situation the mappings need not be everywhere differentiable and in order to handle the set of nondifferentiability points, we establish for such mappings an analog of the Luzin $N$-property with respect to lower dimensional Hausdorff content. Finally, we formulate and prove a~${\rm bridge\ theorem}$ that includes all the above results as particular cases. This result is new also for smooth mappings but is presented here in the general Sobolev context. The proofs of the results are based on our previous joint papers with J.~Bourgain (2013, 2015). Note, that in this paper some result concerning the Coarea formula was not formulated accurately. Now we put an Addendum consisting of three parts: first, we describe the accurate formulation of this result, then we give some historical remarks, and finally its relation to other results of the paper.

math.AP

On the lack of density of Lipschitz mappings in Sobolev spaces with Heisenberg target

We study the question: when are Lipschitz mappings dense in the Sobolev space $W^{1,p}(M,\mathbf{H}^n)$? Here $M$ denotes a compact Riemannian manifold with or without boundary, while $\mathbf{H}^n$ denotes the $n$th Heisenberg group equipped with a sub-Riemannian metric. We show that Lipschitz maps are dense in $W^{1,p}(M,\mathbf{H}^n)$ for all $1\le p<\infty$ if $\dim M \le n$, but that Lipschitz maps are not dense in $W^{1,p}(M,\mathbf{H}^n)$ if $\dim M \ge n+1$ and $n\le p<n+1$. The proofs rely on the construction of smooth horizontal embeddings of the sphere $S^n$ into $\mathbf{H}^n$. We provide two such constructions, one arising from complex hyperbolic geometry and the other arising from symplectic geometry. The nondensity assertion can be interpreted as nontriviality of the $n$th Lipschitz homotopy group of $\mathbf{H}^n$. We initiate a study of Lipschitz homotopy groups for sub-Riemannian spaces.

math.FA

Homotopy groups of spheres and Lipschitz homotopy groups of Heisenberg groups

We provide a sufficient condition for the nontriviality of the Lipschitz homotopy group of the Heisenberg group, $π_m^{Lip}(H_n)$, in terms of properties of the classical homotopy group of the sphere, $π_m(S^n)$. As an application we provide a new simplified proof of the fact that $π_n^{Lip}(H_n)\neq 0$, $n=1,2,...$, and we prove a new result that $π_{4n-1}^{Lip}(H_{2n})\neq 0$ for $n=1,2,...$ The last result is based on a new generalization of the Hopf invariant. We also prove that Lipschitz mappings are not dense in the Sobolev space $W^{1,p}(M,H_{2n})$ when $dim M\geq 4n$ and $4n-1\leq p<4n$.

math.GT

Lipschitz homotopy and density of Lipschitz mappings in Sobolev spaces

We construct a smooth compact n-dimensional manifold Y with one point singularity such that all its Lipschitz homotopy groups are trivial, but Lipschitz mappings Lip(S^n,Y) are not dense in the Sobolev space W^{1,n}(S^n,Y). On the other hand we show that if a metric space Y is Lipschitz (n-1)-connected, then Lipschitz mappings Lip(X,Y) are dense in N^{1,p}(X,Y) whenever the Nagata dimension of X is bounded by n and the space X supports the p-Poincare inequality.

math.GT

Sobolev spaces, Lebesgue points and maximal functions

In this note we study boundedness of a large class of maximal operators in Sobolev spaces that includes the spherical maximal operator. We also study the size of the set of Lebesgue points with respect to convergence associated with such maximal operators.

math.FA

The Lusin theorem and horizontal graphs in the Heisenberg group

In this paper we prove that every collection of measurable functions $f_α$, $|α|=m$ coincides a.e. with $m$th order derivatives of a function $g\in C^{m-1}$ whose derivatives of order $m-1$ may have any modulus of continuity weaker than that of a Lipschitz function. This is a stronger version of earlier results of Lusin, Moonens-Pfeffer and Francos. As an application we construct surfaces in the Heisenberg group with tangent spaces being horizontal a.e.

math.FA

Sobolev mappings, degree, homotopy classes and rational homology spheres

In the paper we investigate the degree and the homotopy theory of Orlicz-Sobolev mappings $W^{1,P}(M,N)$ between manifolds, where the Young function $P$ satisfies a divergence condition and forms a slightly larger space than $W^{1,n}$, $n=\dim M$. In particular, we prove that if $M$ and $N$ are compact oriented manifolds without boundary and $\dim M=\dim N=n$, then the degree is well defined in $W^{1,P}(M,N)$ if and only if the universal cover of $N$ is not a rational homology sphere, and in the case $n=4$, if and only if $N$ is not homeomorphic to $S^4$.

math.FA

Sobolev mappings: Lipschitz density is not an isometric invariant of the target

If $M$ is a compact smooth manifold and $X$ is a compact metric space, the Sobolev space $W^{1,p}(M,X)$ is defined through an isometric embedding of $X$ into a Banach space. We prove that the answer to the question whether Lipschitz mappings ${\rm Lip}\,(M,X)$ are dense in $W^{1,p}(M,X)$ may depend on the isometric embedding of the target.

math.FA