SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Qing Cui

Publications and source records attributed to Qing Cui.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

OmniTable: A Unified Wide-Table System for Petabyte-Scale LLM Data Curation and Exploration

Data curation is a critical bottleneck in industrial-grade LLM development, where petabyte-scale unstructured corpora are scattered across hundreds of physical tables, feature engineering relies on manual, table-centric pipeline orchestration, and data lineage is largely absent. We present OmniTable as an architecture blueprint for a unified wide-table layer built on Logical Unification, Physical Separation, targeting petabyte-scale LLM data curation and exploration. OmniTable makes four contributions: (1) a unified wide-table abstraction that consolidates multi-source heterogeneous data and thousands of derived features under a single logical schema via logical-physical mapping; (2) declarative feature lifecycle management that automates dependency resolution, execution planning, operator fusion, and lineage tracking, replacing manual pipeline orchestration with a "declare-and-execute" paradigm; (3) an adaptive execution engine with autonomous governance that achieves stable PB-scale feature backfill through heterogeneous compute routing (CPU/GPU), adaptive tuning, UDF-level fault tolerance, and automated storage layout optimization; and (4) hybrid-accelerated data exploration combining a global ID index, transparent OLAP offloading, and background materialized views to deliver second-level point lookups and filtered exports exceeding 20 TB/hour. In production, OmniTable manages over 35 PB of training data across web, code, PDF, and SFT domains, reducing the human-in-the-loop curation cycle from approximately 14 days to approximately 2.5 days (5.6x over the pre-OmniTable production workflow), with consistent feature versioning, auditable lineage, and minimal manual intervention.

cs.DB

Tracking the Moving Frontier: Long-Short Term Advantage Estimator

Group-based RLVR methods estimate advantages by repeatedly sampling multiple trajectories for each prompt, making long-horizon agent training expensive and discarding useful experience accumulated across iterations. We ask whether historical experience can replace these repeated within-iteration comparisons without directly optimizing on stale trajectories. We introduce Long-Short Term Advantage Estimator (LSTAE), a single-stream RL algorithm that uses history for advantage estimation while updating the policy only with the current rollout. LSTAE maintains a persistent tracker for each task anchor. At the trajectory level (long term), a drift-aware historical baseline tracks the anchor's moving success frontier and measures the relative contribution of each new trajectory. At the step level (short term), a recent state-experience buffer exploits recurrent states to estimate localized action advantages. This two-timescale design converts accumulated experience into multi-granular credit signals, requiring only one rollout per anchor. Across agentic and mathematical reasoning benchmarks, LSTAE matches or improves upon strong group-based baselines while substantially reducing rollout cost.

cs.LG

Robust Code RL via Faulty-Code-Driven Test case Synthesis and Dense Reward Shaping

Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is pivotal for enhancing LLM code generation, yet its efficacy is often hindered by insufficient test case coverage, leading to reward hacking and policy degradation. To address this, we propose RobustTests, a framework featuring a faulty-code-driven test case synthesis strategy. By leveraging "near-correct" faulty codes, RobustTests captures latent logical discrepancies and employs validator agents with behavioral feature clustering to filter invalid or redundant test cases. Additionally, a stepwise dense reward function based on pass rates is introduced to mitigate false negatives and enhance training robustness. Using this pipeline, we construct an augmented version of the CodeContests+ dataset with superior diagnostic utility. Experimental results show that RL fine-tuning of Qwen3-32B via RobustTests achieves a 3% absolute gain on LiveCodeBench, demonstrating its effectiveness in advancing LLM code generation proficiency. Codes and data are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/sid6/RobustTests.

cs.AI

On the saturation number of the kite graph

For a fixed graph $H$, a graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if $G$ does not contain a copy of $H$, but adding any edge $e \in E(\overline{G})$ to $G$ creates a copy of $H$. The saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $H$-saturated graph on $n$ vertices. Let $K$ be the kite graph, formed by removing one edge from $ K_4$ and then attaching a pendant edge to a vertex of degree two in the resulting graph.In this paper, we first establish a relationship between connectivity and $K$-saturated graphs, and subsequently determine the saturation number of the kite graph $K$. Moreover, we completely characterize all extremal graphs.Our result provides a partial answer to a problem raised by Hua and Peng [Discrete Math. 349 (2026) 114674].

math.CO

A curvature characterization of the Cartan minimal hypersurface in $\mathbb S^5$

Lawson showed that a non-totally geodesic Einstein minimal hypersurface in $\mathbb S^5$ is congruent to the Clifford hypersurface $\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\times \mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2).$ It is also known, by work of Cartan and \^{O}tsuki, that a non-totally geodesic locally conformally flat minimal hypersurface in $\mathbb S^5$ is of \^{O}tsuki type, including the Clifford hypersurface $\mathbb S^1(1/2)\times \mathbb S^3(\sqrt3/2).$ In this paper we study closed minimal hypersurfaces $M$ in $\mathbb S^5$ satisfying $|W|^2=2|\mathring{\operatorname{Ric}}|^2,$ where $W$ is the Weyl tensor and $\mathring{\operatorname{Ric}}$ is the trace-free Ricci tensor. We call this the Euler-balanced condition. We prove that such a hypersurface is either totally geodesic or congruent to the Cartan minimal hypersurface.

math.DG

Improving Cross-Format Robustness in Language Models with Multi-Format Training

Large language models often remain sensitive to answer format: a question solved correctly in one form may fail in another semantically equivalent form. To study this gap, we define cross-format robustness as the extent to which a model answers the same underlying question consistently across formats. We then compare full-format training with FormatMix, which expands only a subset of training items into multiple equivalent formats using either random or targeted selection. Across GLM4 and Llama-3.1, multi-format supervision consistently improves both task performance and cross-format robustness, whereas Multiple-choice question (MCQ)-only supervision alone brings little benefit and can even reduce robustness. We further find that expanding only about 30% of the training set into multiple formats often recovers most of the gain from full-format training, and this effect appears across the model families and sizes we study. These results suggest that format diversity, rather than additional supervision alone, is the key driver of robustness. That lightweight multi-format augmentation is a practical way to make LLMs less sensitive to answer format without changing the base model.

cs.CL

A strict upper volume bound for minimal graphs in the unit ball

Let $u$ be a solution of the minimal surface equation on a domain containing the closed unit ball $\overline{B^n}\subset\mathbb R^n$. A classical calibration argument gives $|Graph_u\cap B^{n+1}| \leq \frac12 |\mathbb S^n|.$ A basic question is whether this half-sphere bound is sharp for minimal graphs. We show that it is not. More precisely, for every $n\geq2$, there exists an explicit constant $\delta_n>0$, depending only on $n$, such that $ | Graph_u\cap B^{n+1}|\leq \frac12 |\mathbb S^n|-\delta_n$. The proof combines calibration with a canonical spherical filling associated with the subgraph and a quantitative incompatibility between near equality in the calibration estimate and the divergence-free structure of the minimal surface equation. We also give an improved explicit gap and formulate the corresponding sharp extremal problem.

math.DG

What Really Improves Mathematical Reasoning: Structured Reasoning Signals Beyond Pure Code

Code has become a standard component of modern foundation language model (LM) training, yet its role beyond programming remains unclear. We revisit the claim that code improves reasoning through controlled pretraining experiments on a 10T-token corpus with fine-grained domain separation. Our findings are threefold. First, when code is restricted to standalone executable programs and Code-NL data are controlled for, code substantially improves programming ability but does not act as a general reasoning enhancer; instead, it competes with knowledge-intensive tasks, especially complex mathematical reasoning. Second, the reasoning gains often attributed to code are better explained by cross-domain structured reasoning traces, such as code-text and math-text mixtures, rather than by executable code alone. Third, increasing the density of structured math-domain samples within a fixed math budget yields substantial gains on difficult mathematical reasoning while largely preserving programming performance, suggesting that cognitive scaffolds offer a targeted way to mitigate cross-domain trade-offs. Finally, routing analyses show that data-composition effects are reflected in expert-activation patterns, providing mechanism-level evidence for competitive and synergistic interactions across domains. Our results clarify which data characteristics transfer across capability dimensions and point to more precise data-centric optimization strategies.

cs.AI

DiffScore: Text Evaluation Beyond Autoregressive Likelihood

Autoregressive language models are widely used for text evaluation, however, their left-to-right factorization introduces positional bias, i.e., early tokens are scored with only leftward context, conflating architectural asymmetry with true text quality. We propose masked reconstruction as an alternative paradigm, where every token is scored using full bidirectional context. We introduce DiffScore, an evaluation framework built on Masked Large Diffusion Language Models. By measuring text recoverability across continuous masking rates, DiffScore eliminates positional bias and naturally establishes an evaluation hierarchy from local fluency to global coherence. We further provide diagnostic tools unavailable to autoregressive frameworks: multi-timestep quality profiles that decompose scores across masking rates, and bidirectional PMI decomposition that disentangles fluency from faithfulness. Experiments across ten benchmarks show that DiffScore consistently outperforms autoregressive baselines in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. The code is released at: https://github.com/wenlai-lavine/DiffScore.

cs.CL

On Representation Redundancy in Large-Scale Instruction Tuning Data Selection

Data quality is a crucial factor in large language models training. While prior work has shown that models trained on smaller, high-quality datasets can outperform those trained on much larger but noisy or low-quality corpora, systematic methods for industrial-scale data selection in instruction tuning remain underexplored. In this work, we study instruction-tuning data selection through the lens of semantic representation similarity and identify a key limitation of state-of-the-art LLM encoders: they produce highly redundant semantic embeddings. To mitigate this redundancy, we propose Compressed Representation Data Selection (CRDS), a novel framework with two variants. CRDS-R applies Rademacher random projection followed by concatenation of transformer hidden-layer representations, while CRDS-W employs whitening-based dimensionality reduction to improve representational quality. Experimental results demonstrate that both variants substantially enhance data quality and consistently outperform state-of-the-art representation-based selection methods. Notably, CRDS-W achieves strong performance using only 3.5% of the data, surpassing the full-data baseline by an average of 0.71% across four datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/tdano1/CRDS.

cs.LG

GRIP: Geometric Refinement and Adaptive Information Potential for Data Efficiency

The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly governed by data efficiency rather than raw scaling volume. However, existing selection methods often decouple global distribution balancing from local instance selection, compromising the hierarchical integrity of the training set. We introduce \textbf{GRIP} (Geometric Refinement and Adaptive Information Potential), a framework that unifies these dimensions by modeling the corpus as an information-dense geometric space. GRIP employs a \textbf{Rapid Adaptation Probe (RAP)} to quantify the information potential of semantic clusters, dynamically re-allocating the sampling budget to regions with the highest representation deficits. Subsequently, we perform Intra-Cluster Selection using a \textbf{length-rectified geometric prior} to counteract embedding density artifacts and preserve long-tail logical sequences. Extensive evaluations on Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models up to 300B tokens demonstrate that GRIP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, \textbf{surpassing the performance of models trained on $3\times$ larger uncurated datasets}. Our work establishes a robust geometric foundation for adaptive data curation in large-scale pre-training.

cs.CL

UniGeM: Unifying Data Mixing and Selection via Geometric Exploration and Mining

The scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly limited by data quality. Most methods handle data mixing and sample selection separately, which can break the structure in code corpora. We introduce \textbf{UniGeM}, a framework that unifies mixing and selection by treating data curation as a \textit{manifold approximation} problem without training proxy models or relying on external reference datasets. UniGeM operates hierarchically: \textbf{Macro-Exploration} learns mixing weights with stability-based clustering; \textbf{Micro-Mining} filters high-quality instances by their geometric distribution to ensure logical consistency. Validated by training 8B and 16B MoE models on 100B tokens, UniGeM achieves \textbf{2.0$\times$ data efficiency} over a random baseline and further improves overall performance compared to SOTA methods in reasoning-heavy evaluations and multilingual generalization.

cs.LG

Improving Autoformalization Using Direct Dependency Retrieval

The convergence of deep learning and formal mathematics has spurred research in formal verification. Statement autoformalization, a crucial first step in this process, aims to translate informal descriptions into machine-verifiable representations but remains a significant challenge. The core difficulty lies in the fact that existing methods often suffer from a lack of contextual awareness, leading to hallucination of formal definitions and theorems. Furthermore, current retrieval-augmented approaches exhibit poor precision and recall for formal library dependency retrieval, and lack the scalability to effectively leverage ever-growing public datasets. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel retrieval-augmented framework based on DDR (\textit{Direct Dependency Retrieval}) for statement autoformalization. Our DDR method directly generates candidate library dependencies from natural language mathematical descriptions and subsequently verifies their existence within the formal library via an efficient suffix array check. Leveraging this efficient search mechanism, we constructed a dependency retrieval dataset of over 500,000 samples and fine-tuned a high-precision DDR model. Experimental results demonstrate that our DDR model significantly outperforms SOTA methods in both retrieval precision and recall. Consequently, an autoformalizer equipped with DDR shows consistent performance advantages in both single-attempt accuracy and multi-attempt stability compared to models using traditional selection-based RAG methods.

cs.AI

Every Activation Boosted: Scaling General Reasoner to 1 Trillion Open Language Foundation

We introduce Ling 2.0, a series reasoning-oriented language foundation built upon the principle that every activation boosts reasoning capability. Designed to scale from tens of billions to one trillion parameters under a unified Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) paradigm, Ling 2.0 emphasizes high sparsity, cross-scale consistency, and efficiency guided by empirical scaling laws. The series includes three non-thinking (instruct) models - Ling-mini-2.0, Ling-flash-2.0, and Ling-1T - ranging from 16B to 1T total parameters and achieving up to 7-fold active-compute efficiency compared with dense counterparts. Ling 2.0 integrates coordinated innovations across model architecture, pre-training, post-training, and infrastructure: a high-sparsity MoE with MTP for efficient reasoning, reasoning-oriented data and mid-training CoT activation, reinforcement-based fine-tuning (DFT, Evo-CoT), and full-scale FP8 training with fine-grained heterogeneous pipelines. At the trillion scale, Ling-1T establishes a new Pareto frontier of reasoning accuracy versus computational efficiency, demonstrating that sparse activation, when properly aligned with reasoning objectives, enables scalable and efficient intelligence. Collectively, Ling 2.0 provides a coherent, open, and efficient foundation for advancing future reasoning and thinking models, including the Ring series built upon the same base.

cs.CL

Some results on minimum saturated graphs

Let $G$ be a graph and $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of graphs. We say a graph $G$ is $\mathcal{F}$-saturated if $G$ does not contain any member in $\mathcal{F}$ and for any $e\in E(\overline{G})$, $G+e$ creates a copy of some member in $ \mathcal{F}$. The saturation number of $\mathcal{F}$ is the minimum number of edges of an $\mathcal{F}$-saturated graphs with $n$ vertices, denoted by $\sat(n,\mathcal{F})$. If $\mathcal{F}=\{F\}$, then we write it as $\sat(n,F)$ for short. In this paper, we determine the exact value of $\sat(n,\{K_3,P_k\})$, and as its application, we obtain two bounds of $\sat(n,K_3\cup P_k)$ for $k\ge 10$ and sufficiently large $n$. Furthermore, $\sat(n,K_1\lor F)$ is determined, where $F$ is a linear forest without isolated vertices.

math.CO

The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic View

The ongoing debate on whether reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) expands or shrinks the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) remains unresolved. Some studies contend that RLVR mainly improves sampling efficiency but at the expense of diversity and exploratory capacity, resulting in capability boundary shrinkage. In contrast, others demonstrate that prolonged training can lead to the emergence of novel reasoning strategies, suggesting capability boundary expansion. To reconcile these contradictory findings, we theoretically and empirically show that both perspectives are partially valid-each aligning with a separate phase in an inherent two-stage probability mass dynamic: (1) Exploitation stage: initially, the model primarily samples explored high-reward and low-reward tokens, while rarely selecting the potentially optimal token. Positive advantage estimates increase the probability of high-reward tokens and decrease those of low-reward tokens, yet the optimal token's probability remains largely unchanged during this stage. (2) Exploration stage: as training advances, the growth rate of previously acquired high-reward tokens slows as their probabilities approach saturation. When a potentially optimal token-now receiving positive advantage estimates-is occasionally sampled, its probability increases, while those of the originally high-reward tokens decrease. This dynamic suggests that over-exploitation during the exploitation stage may lead to capability boundary shrinkage, whereas prolonged training into the exploration stage can promote an expansion of the reasoning capability boundary. Building upon our insights, we revisit the potential of only using relative negative gradients for prolonging training, providing a theoretical and empirical foundation for the development of more advanced reasoning capabilities.

cs.LG

Ring-lite: Scalable Reasoning via C3PO-Stabilized Reinforcement Learning for LLMs

We present Ring-lite, a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-based large language model optimized via reinforcement learning (RL) to achieve efficient and robust reasoning capabilities. Built upon the publicly available Ling-lite model, a 16.8 billion parameter model with 2.75 billion activated parameters, our approach matches the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) small-scale reasoning models on challenging benchmarks (e.g., AIME, LiveCodeBench, GPQA-Diamond) while activating only one-third of the parameters required by comparable models. To accomplish this, we introduce a joint training pipeline integrating distillation with RL, revealing undocumented challenges in MoE RL training. First, we identify optimization instability during RL training, and we propose Constrained Contextual Computation Policy Optimization(C3PO), a novel approach that enhances training stability and improves computational throughput via algorithm-system co-design methodology. Second, we empirically demonstrate that selecting distillation checkpoints based on entropy loss for RL training, rather than validation metrics, yields superior performance-efficiency trade-offs in subsequent RL training. Finally, we develop a two-stage training paradigm to harmonize multi-domain data integration, addressing domain conflicts that arise in training with mixed dataset. We will release the model, dataset, and code.

cs.CL

SHARP: Synthesizing High-quality Aligned Reasoning Problems for Large Reasoning Models Reinforcement Learning

Training large reasoning models (LRMs) with reinforcement learning in STEM domains is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality, diverse, and verifiable problem sets. Existing synthesis methods, such as Chain-of-Thought prompting, often generate oversimplified or uncheckable data, limiting model advancement on complex tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce SHARP, a unified approach to Synthesizing High-quality Aligned Reasoning Problems for LRMs reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). SHARP encompasses a strategic set of self-alignment principles -- targeting graduate and Olympiad-level difficulty, rigorous logical consistency, and unambiguous, verifiable answers -- and a structured three-phase framework (Alignment, Instantiation, Inference) that ensures thematic diversity and fine-grained control over problem generation. We implement SHARP by leveraging a state-of-the-art LRM to infer and verify challenging STEM questions, then employ a reinforcement learning loop to refine the model's reasoning through verifiable reward signals. Experiments on benchmarks such as GPQA demonstrate that SHARP-augmented training substantially outperforms existing methods, markedly improving complex reasoning accuracy and pushing LRM performance closer to expert-level proficiency. Our contributions include the SHARP strategy, framework design, end-to-end implementation, and experimental evaluation of its effectiveness in elevating LRM reasoning capabilities.

cs.AI