arXiv subjects

Qingxiao Xu

Publications and source records attributed to Qingxiao Xu.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SoK: DARPA's AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC): Competition Design, Architectures, and Lessons Learned

DARPA's AI Cyber Challenge (AIxCC, 2023--2025) is the largest competition to date for building fully autonomous cyber reasoning systems (CRSs) that leverage recent advances in AI -- particularly large language models (LLMs) -- to discover and remediate vulnerabilities in real-world open-source software. This paper presents the first systematic analysis of AIxCC. Drawing on design documents, source code, execution traces, and discussions with organizers and competing teams, we examine the competition's structure and key design decisions, characterize the architectural approaches of finalist CRSs, and analyze competition results beyond the final scoreboard. Our analysis reveals the factors that truly drove CRS performance, identifies genuine technical advances achieved by teams, and exposes limitations that remain open for future research. We conclude with lessons for organizing future competitions and broader insights toward deploying autonomous CRSs in practice.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

FuzzingBrain V2: A Multi-Agent LLM System for Automated Vulnerability Discovery and Reproduction

Software vulnerabilities pose critical security threats, with nearly 50,000 CVEs reported in 2025. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for automated vulnerability detection, three key challenges remain. First, LLM-generated vulnerability reports suffer from high false positive rates and lack reproducible verification. Second, existing LLM-based approaches use suboptimal granularities for vulnerability localization: function-level analysis overlooks bugs when context becomes extensive, while line-level analysis lacks sufficient context. Third, existing approaches have difficulty reasoning about vulnerabilities with complex cross-function dependencies and triggering conditions. We present FuzzingBrain V2, a multi-agent system that addresses these gaps through four key contributions: (1) fully automated vulnerability analysis built on Google's OSS-Fuzz, ensuring all reported vulnerabilities are fuzzer-reproducible; (2) Suspicious Point, a novel control-flow-based abstraction for precise vulnerability localization at the optimal granularity; (3) logic-driven hierarchical function analysis with dual-layer fuzzing enhancing function coverage under resource constraints; (4) MCP-based static and dynamic analysis tools with context engineering enhancing complex vulnerability reasoning. On the AIxCC 2025 Final Competition C/C++ dataset, FuzzingBrain V2 achieved 90% detection rate (36 of 40 vulnerabilities). In real-world deployment, FuzzingBrain V2 discovered 29 zero-day vulnerabilities across 12 open-source projects, all confirmed and fixed by maintainers, with 2 assigned CVE IDs.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Quality-Assured Fuzz Harness Generation via the Four Principles Framework

Fuzz testing is the dominant technique for finding memory-safety vulnerabilities in C/C++ software, yet its effectiveness hinges on the quality of fuzz harnesses -- the programs that bridge fuzzers and library APIs. A growing body of tools now automate harness generation, but none systematically ensures the correctness of produced harnesses: logic errors, API misuse, and lifecycle violations go undetected at the source level. As LLM-driven generation scales harness creation, uncontrolled quality turns scale into a liability. We present QuartetFuzz, an autonomous harness-generation system that systematically improves correctness throughout the generation process. At its core is the Four Principles framework -- Logic Correctness (P1), API Protocol Compliance (P2), Security Boundary Respect (P3), and Entry Point Adequacy (P4) -- the first source-level definition of harness correctness with mathematical specifications and implementable checks. We operationalize these principles in an autonomous LLM agent that produces harnesses satisfying P1-P4 through a generate-check-fix loop before any fuzzing begins. Deployed on 23 open-source projects spanning C/C++, Java, and JavaScript, the system submits 42 bug reports, of which 29 are fixed or confirmed upstream (including 3 CVEs) and only 2 are rejected (4.8% FP rate). During generation, the built-in P1/P2 checks automatically intercepted 58 harness-induced crashes that would otherwise have been false positives. Applied as a quality auditor to 586 existing production harnesses across 70 projects, the system identifies 53 violations (45 confirmed, 35 fixed). We release a dataset of 100 labeled harnesses for reproducible evaluation. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/OwenSanzas/QuartetFuzz

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

A Systematic Study of LLM-Based Architectures for Automated Patching

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automated patching, but their effectiveness depends strongly on how they are integrated into patching systems. While prior work explores prompting strategies and individual agent designs, the field lacks a systematic comparison of patching architectures. In this paper, we present a controlled evaluation of four LLM-based patching paradigms -- fixed workflow, single-agent system, multi-agent system, and general-purpose code agents -- using a unified benchmark and evaluation framework. We analyze patch correctness, failure modes, token usage, and execution time across real-world vulnerability tasks. Our results reveal clear architectural trade-offs: fixed workflows are efficient but brittle, single-agent systems balance flexibility and cost, and multi-agent designs improve generalization at the expense of substantially higher overhead and increased risk of reasoning drift on complex tasks. Surprisingly, general-purpose code agents achieve the strongest overall patching performance, benefiting from general-purpose tool interfaces that support effective adaptation across vulnerability types. Overall, we show that architectural design and iteration depth, rather than model capability alone, dominate the reliability and cost of LLM-based automated patching.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

FORGE-Tree: Diffusion-Forcing Tree Search for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation

Long-horizon robot manipulation tasks remain challenging for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies due to drift and exposure bias, often denoise the entire trajectory with fixed hyperparameters, causing small geometric errors to compound across stages and offering no mechanism to allocate extra test-time compute where clearances are tight. To address these challenges, we introduce FORGE-Tree, a plug-in control layer that couples a stage-aligned Diffusion Forcing (DF) head with test-time Monte Carlo Tree Diffusion (MCTD). With a frozen VLA encoder, DF aligns timesteps to subtask stages; during inference we partially denoise only a target segment while keeping other tokens frozen, turning trajectory refinement into a sequence of local edits. We then apply Monte Carlo Tree Diffusion to select the next segment to refine. A scene graph supplies priors for expansion and geometry relation-aware scoring for rollouts, yielding tree-structured denoising whose performance scales with search budget while preserving the executed prefix. Evaluation on LIBERO, FORGE-Tree improves success rate by 13.4 to 17.2 pp over the native VLA baselines with both OpenVLA and Octo-Base. Gains remain consistent under comparable compute budgets, especially on long-horizon variants. Videos available at: https://taco-group.github.io/FORGE-Tree/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

All You Need Is A Fuzzing Brain: An LLM-Powered System for Automated Vulnerability Detection and Patching

Our team, All You Need Is A Fuzzing Brain, was one of seven finalists in DARPA's Artificial Intelligence Cyber Challenge (AIxCC), placing fourth in the final round. During the competition, we developed a Cyber Reasoning System (CRS) that autonomously discovered 28 security vulnerabilities - including six previously unknown zero-days - in real-world open-source C and Java projects, and successfully patched 14 of them. The complete CRS is open source at https://github.com/o2lab/afc-crs-all-you-need-is-a-fuzzing-brain. This paper provides a detailed technical description of our CRS, with an emphasis on its LLM-powered components and strategies. Building on AIxCC, we further introduce a public leaderboard for benchmarking state-of-the-art LLMs on vulnerability detection and patching tasks, derived from the AIxCC dataset. The leaderboard is available at https://o2lab.github.io/FuzzingBrain-Leaderboard/.

cs.CR↗