arXiv subjects

Quentin Delfosse

Publications and source records attributed to Quentin Delfosse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Learning Explicit Behavioral Models with Adaptive Questions and World-Model Probes

Interactive agents trained only against task return can achieve high scores while failing to represent the mechanisms that make their actions succeed. This makes brittle behavior difficult to diagnose and limits adaptation when environment dynamics change. Existing LLM reflection and policy-code repair can revise behavior from failed trajectories, but questions and world-understanding tests are usually used only after training. We introduce an Explicit Symbolic Behavioral Model (ESBM), a trainable behavioral model that couples task performance with evidence-grounded question answering and executable mechanism prediction. An ESBM represents behavior through typed predicates, weighted rules, bounded options and mechanism memory; the mechanism layer predicts symbolic events, object changes, rewards and terminal consequences under action interventions. After each rollout, adaptive questions and active world-model probes convert score failures, QA errors and transition-prediction errors into constraints for local ESBM edits. Candidate models are selected by a multi-criterion rule that jointly evaluates task score, answerability and active world-model consistency. Under the tested Atari-style protocols, ESBM learns high-scoring policies while producing explicit answers and executable mechanism predictions, indicating that adaptive questions can serve as both training pressure and reusable benchmarks for mechanistic policy learning in this setting.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Kintsugi: Learning Policies by Repairing Executable Knowledge Bases

Modern embodied agents achieve impressive performance, but their task knowledge is often stored in neural weights, latent state, or prompt-bound memory, making individual policy knowledge difficult to inspect, validate, recombine, and reuse. We introduce \textbf{Kintsugi}, a white-box policy-learning framework that treats embodied policy improvement as verifier-gated construction of a typed executable Knowledge Base (KB). Kintsugi represents task-level policy knowledge as composable typed entries -- predicates, operators, policy schemas, monitors, recovery rules, experience records, and goals -- and improves this artifact through localized typed edits induced from rollout evidence, rather than relying on test-time language-model reasoning. Between rollouts, a tool-constrained agentic editing loop diagnoses trajectory failures, localizes them to editable KB layers, and proposes candidate edits. A deterministic verification gate admits an edit only when the candidate type-checks, the resulting KB executes, and focused validation success or trajectory-health metrics improve without violating protected-regression checks. At inference, the accepted KB is executed by a deterministic symbolic executor with zero LLM calls. Across long-horizon text-agent benchmarks and representative object-centric manipulation settings, Kintsugi achieves strong endpoint performance while preserving inspectability, local editability, and verifier-gated deployment. These results suggest that embodied policy improvement can be organized around executable task knowledge.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

GRAIL: Autonomous Concept Grounding for Neuro-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning

Neuro-symbolic Reinforcement Learning (NeSy-RL) combines symbolic reasoning with gradient-based optimization to achieve interpretable and generalizable policies. Relational concepts, such as "left of" or "close by", serve as foundational building blocks that structure how agents perceive and act. However, conventional approaches require human experts to manually define these concepts, limiting adaptability since concept semantics vary across environments. We propose GRAIL (Grounding Relational Agents through Interactive Learning), a framework that autonomously grounds relational concepts through environmental interaction. GRAIL leverages large language models (LLMs) to provide generic concept representations as weak supervision, then refines them to capture environment-specific semantics. This approach addresses both sparse reward signals and concept misalignment prevalent in underdetermined environments. Experiments on the Atari games Kangaroo, Seaquest, and Skiing demonstrate that GRAIL matches or outperforms agents with manually crafted concepts in simplified settings, and reveals informative trade-offs between reward maximization and high-level goal completion in the full environment.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

LLMs Gaming Verifiers: RLVR can Lead to Reward Hacking

As reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become the dominant paradigm for scaling reasoning capabilities in LLMs, a new failure mode emerges: LLMs gaming verifiers. We study this phenomenon on inductive reasoning tasks, where models must induce and output logical rules. We find that RLVR-trained models systematically abandon rule induction. Instead of learning generalizable patterns (e.g., ``trains carrying red cars go east''), they enumerate instance-level labels, producing outputs that pass verifiers without capturing the relational patterns required by the task. We show that this behavior is not a failure of understanding but a form of reward hacking: imperfect verifiers that check only extensional correctness admit false positives. To detect such shortcuts, we introduce Isomorphic Perturbation Testing (IPT), which evaluates a single model output under both extensional and isomorphic verification, where the latter enforces invariance under logically isomorphic tasks. While genuine rule induction remains invariant, shortcut strategies fail. We find that shortcut behavior is specific to RLVR-trained reasoning models (e.g., GPT-5, Olmo3) and absent in non-RLVR models (e.g., GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, Ministral). Moreover, shortcut prevalence increases with task complexity and inference-time compute. In controlled training experiments, extensional verification directly induces shortcut strategies, while isomorphic verification eliminates them. These results show that RLVR can incentivize reward hacking not only through overt manipulation but also by exploiting what the verifier fails to enforce.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Reasoning models do not yet follow their reasoning in autonomous driving: The KITScenes LongTail Dataset

Handling rare events is the central open challenge in autonomous driving. Reasoning models, which generate explicit chains of reasoning before acting, promise to generalize to such events. Here we show that these models frequently do not follow their own reasoning: the actions they state in their reasoning often diverge from the actions they ultimately execute. We introduce KITScenes LongTail, a curated dataset of rare driving scenarios to quantify this divergence through a measure of semantic reasoning-action coherence. We find that incoherence is widespread across current general-purpose and domain-specific models. Strikingly, when reasoned actions and executed actions disagree, the reasoning is usually right: extracting actions from the reasoning trace and executing them through a kinematic model enforces coherence and typically improves motion planning. These results suggest that the reasoning capabilities of current models exceed what their actions reveal, and that coherently acting on stated reasoning is a prerequisite for trustworthy autonomous driving. Our dataset and evaluation space are available at: https://hf.co/datasets/kit-mrt/kitscenes-longtail

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Boosting deep Reinforcement Learning using pretraining with Logical Options

Deep reinforcement learning agents are often misaligned, as they over-exploit early reward signals. Recently, several symbolic approaches have addressed these challenges by encoding sparse objectives along with aligned plans. However, purely symbolic architectures are complex to scale and difficult to apply to continuous settings. Hence, we propose a hybrid approach, inspired by humans' ability to acquire new skills. We use a two-stage framework that injects symbolic structure into neural-based reinforcement learning agents without sacrificing the expressivity of deep policies. Our method, called Hybrid Hierarchical RL (H^2RL), introduces a logical option-based pretraining strategy to steer the learning policy away from short-term reward loops and toward goal-directed behavior while allowing the final policy to be refined via standard environment interaction. Empirically, we show that this approach consistently improves long-horizon decision-making and yields agents that outperform strong neural, symbolic, and neuro-symbolic baselines.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

STORM: Segment, Track, and Object Re-Localization from a Single Image

Accurate 6D pose estimation and tracking are core capabilities for physical AI systems, yet real-world deployment remains brittle and labor-intensive. Many pipelines rely on CAD models, manual masking, or per-object adaptation, and still fail under occlusion or fast motion without a principled way to recognize failure. We propose STORM, a unified framework for reference-conditioned 6D tracking that can operate from a single reference image, with minimal manual input and improved robustness. STORM combines: (i) Hierarchical Spatial Fusion Attention (HSFA), a task-driven reference-query fusion architecture that supports both single-reference and multi-reference conditioning and can optionally use vision-language semantic conditioning to resolve instance ambiguities; and (ii) a BCE-trained tracking verifier whose continuous compatibility logit is used as an energy-like score to detect drift and trigger automatic re-initialization. Experiments on LM-O and YCB-Video show that STORM improves annotation-free pose tracking accuracy over strong baselines and recovers reliably from severe occlusions and rapid viewpoint changes with minimal overhead.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents are not even close to Human Intelligence

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents achieve impressive results in a wide variety of tasks, but they lack zero-shot adaptation capabilities. While most robustness evaluations focus on tasks complexifications, for which human also struggle to maintain performances, no evaluation has been performed on tasks simplifications. To tackle this issue, we introduce HackAtari, a set of task variations of the Arcade Learning Environments. We use it to demonstrate that, contrary to humans, RL agents systematically exhibit huge performance drops on simpler versions of their training tasks, uncovering agents' consistent reliance on shortcuts. Our analysis across multiple algorithms and architectures highlights the persistent gap between RL agents and human behavioral intelligence, underscoring the need for new benchmarks and methodologies that enforce systematic generalization testing beyond static evaluation protocols. Training and testing in the same environment is not enough to obtain agents equipped with human-like intelligence.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Better Decisions through the Right Causal World Model

Reinforcement learning (RL) agents have shown remarkable performances in various environments, where they can discover effective policies directly from sensory inputs. However, these agents often exploit spurious correlations in the training data, resulting in brittle behaviours that fail to generalize to new or slightly modified environments. To address this, we introduce the Causal Object-centric Model Extraction Tool (COMET), a novel algorithm designed to learn the exact interpretable causal world models (CWMs). COMET first extracts object-centric state descriptions from observations and identifies the environment's internal states related to the depicted objects' properties. Using symbolic regression, it models object-centric transitions and derives causal relationships governing object dynamics. COMET further incorporates large language models (LLMs) for semantic inference, annotating causal variables to enhance interpretability. By leveraging these capabilities, COMET constructs CWMs that align with the true causal structure of the environment, enabling agents to focus on task-relevant features. The extracted CWMs mitigate the danger of shortcuts, permitting the development of RL systems capable of better planning and decision-making across dynamic scenarios. Our results, validated in Atari environments such as Pong and Freeway, demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of COMET, highlighting its potential to bridge the gap between object-centric reasoning and causal inference in reinforcement learning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Deep Reinforcement Learning via Object-Centric Attention

Deep reinforcement learning agents, trained on raw pixel inputs, often fail to generalize beyond their training environments, relying on spurious correlations and irrelevant background details. To address this issue, object-centric agents have recently emerged. However, they require different representations tailored to the task specifications. Contrary to deep agents, no single object-centric architecture can be applied to any environment. Inspired by principles of cognitive science and Occam's Razor, we introduce Object-Centric Attention via Masking (OCCAM), which selectively preserves task-relevant entities while filtering out irrelevant visual information. Specifically, OCCAM takes advantage of the object-centric inductive bias. Empirical evaluations on Atari benchmarks demonstrate that OCCAM significantly improves robustness to novel perturbations and reduces sample complexity while showing similar or improved performance compared to conventional pixel-based RL. These results suggest that structured abstraction can enhance generalization without requiring explicit symbolic representations or domain-specific object extraction pipelines.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating Interpretable Reinforcement Learning by Distilling Policies into Programs

There exist applications of reinforcement learning like medicine where policies need to be ''interpretable'' by humans. User studies have shown that some policy classes might be more interpretable than others. However, it is costly to conduct human studies of policy interpretability. Furthermore, there is no clear definition of policy interpretabiliy, i.e., no clear metrics for interpretability and thus claims depend on the chosen definition. We tackle the problem of empirically evaluating policies interpretability without humans. Despite this lack of clear definition, researchers agree on the notions of ''simulatability'': policy interpretability should relate to how humans understand policy actions given states. To advance research in interpretable reinforcement learning, we contribute a new methodology to evaluate policy interpretability. This new methodology relies on proxies for simulatability that we use to conduct a large-scale empirical evaluation of policy interpretability. We use imitation learning to compute baseline policies by distilling expert neural networks into small programs. We then show that using our methodology to evaluate the baselines interpretability leads to similar conclusions as user studies. We show that increasing interpretability does not necessarily reduce performances and can sometimes increase them. We also show that there is no policy class that better trades off interpretability and performance across tasks making it necessary for researcher to have methodologies for comparing policies interpretability.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Interpretable end-to-end Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning agents

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents rely on shortcut learning, preventing them from generalizing to slightly different environments. To address this problem, symbolic method, that use object-centric states, have been developed. However, comparing these methods to deep agents is not fair, as these last operate from raw pixel-based states. In this work, we instantiate the symbolic SCoBots framework. SCoBots decompose RL tasks into intermediate, interpretable representations, culminating in action decisions based on a comprehensible set of object-centric relational concepts. This architecture aids in demystifying agent decisions. By explicitly learning to extract object-centric representations from raw states, object-centric RL, and policy distillation via rule extraction, this work places itself within the neurosymbolic AI paradigm, blending the strengths of neural networks with symbolic AI. We present the first implementation of an end-to-end trained SCoBot, separately evaluate of its components, on different Atari games. The results demonstrate the framework's potential to create interpretable and performing RL systems, and pave the way for future research directions in obtaining end-to-end interpretable RL agents.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

BlendRL: A Framework for Merging Symbolic and Neural Policy Learning

Humans can leverage both symbolic reasoning and intuitive reactions. In contrast, reinforcement learning policies are typically encoded in either opaque systems like neural networks or symbolic systems that rely on predefined symbols and rules. This disjointed approach severely limits the agents' capabilities, as they often lack either the flexible low-level reaction characteristic of neural agents or the interpretable reasoning of symbolic agents. To overcome this challenge, we introduce BlendRL, a neuro-symbolic RL framework that harmoniously integrates both paradigms within RL agents that use mixtures of both logic and neural policies. We empirically demonstrate that BlendRL agents outperform both neural and symbolic baselines in standard Atari environments, and showcase their robustness to environmental changes. Additionally, we analyze the interaction between neural and symbolic policies, illustrating how their hybrid use helps agents overcome each other's limitations.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

OCALM: Object-Centric Assessment with Language Models

Properly defining a reward signal to efficiently train a reinforcement learning (RL) agent is a challenging task. Designing balanced objective functions from which a desired behavior can emerge requires expert knowledge, especially for complex environments. Learning rewards from human feedback or using large language models (LLMs) to directly provide rewards are promising alternatives, allowing non-experts to specify goals for the agent. However, black-box reward models make it difficult to debug the reward. In this work, we propose Object-Centric Assessment with Language Models (OCALM) to derive inherently interpretable reward functions for RL agents from natural language task descriptions. OCALM uses the extensive world-knowledge of LLMs while leveraging the object-centric nature common to many environments to derive reward functions focused on relational concepts, providing RL agents with the ability to derive policies from task descriptions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

EXPIL: Explanatory Predicate Invention for Learning in Games

Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be a powerful tool for training agents that excel in various games. However, the black-box nature of neural network models often hinders our ability to understand the reasoning behind the agent's actions. Recent research has attempted to address this issue by using the guidance of pretrained neural agents to encode logic-based policies, allowing for interpretable decisions. A drawback of such approaches is the requirement of large amounts of predefined background knowledge in the form of predicates, limiting its applicability and scalability. In this work, we propose a novel approach, Explanatory Predicate Invention for Learning in Games (EXPIL), that identifies and extracts predicates from a pretrained neural agent, later used in the logic-based agents, reducing the dependency on predefined background knowledge. Our experimental evaluation on various games demonstrate the effectiveness of EXPIL in achieving explainable behavior in logic agents while requiring less background knowledge.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

HackAtari: Atari Learning Environments for Robust and Continual Reinforcement Learning

Artificial agents' adaptability to novelty and alignment with intended behavior is crucial for their effective deployment. Reinforcement learning (RL) leverages novelty as a means of exploration, yet agents often struggle to handle novel situations, hindering generalization. To address these issues, we propose HackAtari, a framework introducing controlled novelty to the most common RL benchmark, the Atari Learning Environment. HackAtari allows us to create novel game scenarios (including simplification for curriculum learning), to swap the game elements' colors, as well as to introduce different reward signals for the agent. We demonstrate that current agents trained on the original environments include robustness failures, and evaluate HackAtari's efficacy in enhancing RL agents' robustness and aligning behavior through experiments using C51 and PPO. Overall, HackAtari can be used to improve the robustness of current and future RL algorithms, allowing Neuro-Symbolic RL, curriculum RL, causal RL, as well as LLM-driven RL. Our work underscores the significance of developing interpretable in RL agents.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Interpretable and Editable Programmatic Tree Policies for Reinforcement Learning

Deep reinforcement learning agents are prone to goal misalignments. The black-box nature of their policies hinders the detection and correction of such misalignments, and the trust necessary for real-world deployment. So far, solutions learning interpretable policies are inefficient or require many human priors. We propose INTERPRETER, a fast distillation method producing INTerpretable Editable tRee Programs for ReinforcEmenT lEaRning. We empirically demonstrate that INTERPRETER compact tree programs match oracles across a diverse set of sequential decision tasks and evaluate the impact of our design choices on interpretability and performances. We show that our policies can be interpreted and edited to correct misalignments on Atari games and to explain real farming strategies.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Towards a Research Community in Interpretable Reinforcement Learning: the InterpPol Workshop

Embracing the pursuit of intrinsically explainable reinforcement learning raises crucial questions: what distinguishes explainability from interpretability? Should explainable and interpretable agents be developed outside of domains where transparency is imperative? What advantages do interpretable policies offer over neural networks? How can we rigorously define and measure interpretability in policies, without user studies? What reinforcement learning paradigms,are the most suited to develop interpretable agents? Can Markov Decision Processes integrate interpretable state representations? In addition to motivate an Interpretable RL community centered around the aforementioned questions, we propose the first venue dedicated to Interpretable RL: the InterpPol Workshop.

cs.AI↗