arXiv subjects

R. B. Sandeep

Publications and source records attributed to R. B. Sandeep.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2015

A cubic vertex kernel for Diamond-free Edge Deletion and more

A diamond is a graph obtained by removing an edge from a complete graph on four vertices. A graph is diamond-free if it does not contain an induced diamond. The Diamond-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most $k$ edges in the input graph $G$ whose deletion results in a diamond-free graph. For this problem, a polynomial kernel of $O(k^4$) vertices was found by Fellows et. al. (Discrete Optimization, 2011). In this paper, we give an improved kernel of $O(k^3)$ vertices for Diamond-free Edge Deletion. Further, we give an $O(k^2)$ vertex kernel for a related problem {Diamond,K_t}-free Edge Deletion, where $t\geq 4$ is any fixed integer. To complement our results, we prove that these problems are NP-complete even for $K_4$-free graphs and can be solved neither in subexponential time (i.e., $2^{o(|G|)}$) nor in parameterized subexponential time (i.e., $2^{o(k)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$), unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Our reduction implies the hardness and lower bound for a general class of problems, where these problems come as a special case.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Parameterized Lower Bounds and Dichotomy Results for the NP-completeness of $H$-free Edge Modification Problems

For a graph $H$, the $H$-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most $k$ edges whose deletion from the input graph $G$ results in a graph without any induced copy of $H$. $H$-free Edge Completion and $H$-free Edge Editing are defined similarly where only completion (addition) of edges are allowed in the former and both completion and deletion are allowed in the latter. We completely settle the classical complexities of these problems by proving that $H$-free Edge Deletion is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least two edges, $H$-free Edge Completion is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least two non-edges and $H$-free Edge Editing is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least three vertices. Additionally, we prove that, these NP-complete problems cannot be solved in parameterized subexponential time, i.e., in time $2^{o(k)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Furthermore, we obtain implications on the incompressibility of these problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Parameterized lower bound and NP-completeness of some $H$-free Edge Deletion problems

For a graph $H$, the $H$-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most $k$ edges whose deletion from the input graph $G$ results in a graph without any induced copy of $H$. We prove that $H$-free Edge Deletion is NP-complete if $H$ is a graph with at least two edges and $H$ has a component with maximum number of vertices which is a tree or a regular graph. Furthermore, we obtain that these NP-complete problems cannot be solved in parameterized subexponential time, i.e., in time $2^{o(k)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

The chromatic discrepancy of graphs

For a proper vertex coloring $c$ of a graph $G$, let $φ_c(G)$ denote the maximum, over all induced subgraphs $H$ of $G$, the difference between the chromatic number $χ(H)$ and the number of colors used by $c$ to color $H$. We define the chromatic discrepancy of a graph $G$, denoted by $φ(G)$, to be the minimum $φ_c(G)$, over all proper colorings $c$ of $G$. If $H$ is restricted to only connected induced subgraphs, we denote the corresponding parameter by $\hatφ(G)$. These parameters are aimed at studying graph colorings that use as few colors as possible in a graph and all its induced subgraphs. We study the parameters $φ(G)$ and $\hatφ(G)$ and obtain bounds on them. We obtain general bounds, as well as bounds for certain special classes of graphs including random graphs. We provide structural characterizations of graphs with $φ(G) = 0$ and graphs with $\hatφ(G) = 0$. We also show that computing these parameters is NP-hard.

math.CO↗

arXiv2014

On Polynomial Kernelization of $\mathcal{H}$-free Edge Deletion

For a set of graphs $\mathcal{H}$, the \textsc{$\mathcal{H}$-free Edge Deletion} problem asks to find whether there exist at most $k$ edges in the input graph whose deletion results in a graph without any induced copy of $H\in\mathcal{H}$. In \cite{cai1996fixed}, it is shown that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable if $\mathcal{H}$ is of finite cardinality. However, it is proved in \cite{cai2013incompressibility} that if $\mathcal{H}$ is a singleton set containing $H$, for a large class of $H$, there exists no polynomial kernel unless $coNP\subseteq NP/poly$. In this paper, we present a polynomial kernel for this problem for any fixed finite set $\mathcal{H}$ of connected graphs and when the input graphs are of bounded degree. We note that there are \textsc{$\mathcal{H}$-free Edge Deletion} problems which remain NP-complete even for the bounded degree input graphs, for example \textsc{Triangle-free Edge Deletion}\cite{brugmann2009generating} and \textsc{Custer Edge Deletion($P_3$-free Edge Deletion)}\cite{komusiewicz2011alternative}. When $\mathcal{H}$ contains $K_{1,s}$, we obtain a stronger result - a polynomial kernel for $K_t$-free input graphs (for any fixed $t> 2$). We note that for $s>9$, there is an incompressibility result for \textsc{$K_{1,s}$-free Edge Deletion} for general graphs \cite{cai2012polynomial}. Our result provides first polynomial kernels for \textsc{Claw-free Edge Deletion} and \textsc{Line Edge Deletion} for $K_t$-free input graphs which are NP-complete even for $K_4$-free graphs\cite{yannakakis1981edge} and were raised as open problems in \cite{cai2013incompressibility,open2013worker}.

cs.DS↗