SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

R. C. Nunes

Publications and source records attributed to R. C. Nunes.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tracing the Evolution of $Ω_m(z)$ over the Last 10 Billion Years with Non-parametric Methods

We investigate the redshift evolution of the matter density parameter, $Ω_m(z)$, using galaxy cluster gas mass fraction measurements combined with cosmic chronometer $H(z)$ data and type Ia supernova luminosity distances. Our approach employs Gaussian Process Regression to reconstruct $Ω_m(z)$ in a non-parametric way, remaining only weakly dependent on a specific background cosmology. The reconstructed evolution is consistent with the standard $ρ_m \propto (1+z)^3$ scaling predicted by the $Λ$CDM model. We obtain $Ω_{m0}=0.296 \pm 0.044$ from the 44-cluster sample, and $Ω_{m0}=0.271 \pm 0.016$, $0.253 \pm 0.017$, and $0.210 \pm 0.013$ for the 103-cluster compilation, depending on the assumed mass calibration. While $Ω_m(z)$ follows the expected redshift behaviour, the inferred value of $Ω_{m0}$ shows a strong dependence on the cluster mass calibration. Within this framework, mass bias emerges as the dominant source of uncertainty, exceeding statistical errors.

astro-ph.CO

Linear Growth of Matter Perturbations Probed by Redshift-Space Distortions in Interacting $Λ(t)$CDM Cosmologies

In the context of a spatially flat $Λ(t)$CDM cosmology, we investigate interacting dark energy (IDE) scenarios characterized by phenomenological interaction terms proportional to the Hubble expansion rate and the dark energy density. Our analysis is performed at both the background and linear perturbation levels, with particular emphasis on the evolution of dark matter density fluctuations. Cosmological constraints are derived from a joint analysis of CMB distance priors, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from Pantheon+, Redshift-Space Distortions (RSD), and $H(z)$ data from Cosmic Chronometers (CC). Using the linear growth of matter perturbations, we estimate the clustering parameter $S_8$ within IDE extensions of the flat $Λ(t)$CDM framework. At the perturbative level, we consider interaction terms of the form $Q_{\text{I}}=\varepsilon a H\barρ_{Λ(t)}$ (Model I) and $Q_{\text{II}}=\varepsilon H\barρ_{Λ(t)}$ (Model II). From the combined dataset, we obtain the constraints $S_8 = 0.870 \pm 0.026$ for Model I and $S_8 = 0.872 \pm 0.026$ for Model II. Finally, we discuss the implications for the coupling parameter $\varepsilon$, taking into account the semi-analytical approximations and observational data employed in this study.

astro-ph.CO