arXiv subjects

R. Reischke

Publications and source records attributed to R. Reischke.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

KiDS-Legacy: Joint analysis of second- and third-order cosmic shear

Weak lensing by large-scale structure is a powerful cosmological probe. While most analyses rely on second-order correlations, these are primarily sensitive to the parameter combination $S_8 = \sigma_8 (\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$, limiting their ability to constrain $\Omega_m$ and other cosmological parameters independently. Higher-order statistics capture non-Gaussian features of the density field and can therefore break parameter degeneracies and extract more cosmological information from weak lensing surveys. We present a joint analysis of second- and third-order cosmic shear in the final data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-Legacy). We combine COSEBIs (Complete Orthogonal Sets of E-/B-mode Integrals) at scales between 2' and 300' with third-order aperture mass moments at scales between 4' and 32' to perform a joint analysis of second- and third-order statistics. Compared to previous KiDS analyses, we implement several methodological advances: an intrinsic alignment model with redshift and mass dependence, a baryon correction model validated on multiple hydrodynamical simulations, and corrections for reduced shear and source clustering. Combining COSEBIs with third-order aperture mass statistics in KiDS-Legacy yields $\Omega_m = 0.297^{+0.056}_{-0.040}$ and $S_8 = 0.806^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$, significantly tightening the $\Omega_m$ constraints and more than doubling the figure of merit in the $\Omega_m$--$S_8$ plane compared to the two-point analysis alone. The third-order measurements pass stringent internal consistency tests, are fully compatible with the KiDS-Legacy 2-point constraints, other 2+3-point lensing results and with Planck CMB measurements within $1\sigma$, providing no evidence for an $S_8$ tension and demonstrating the maturity of 3-point cosmic shear as a key probe for forthcoming surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2025

Euclid: Photometric redshift calibration with self-organising maps

The Euclid survey aims to trace the evolution of cosmic structures up to redshift $z$ $\sim$ 3 and beyond. Its success depends critically on obtaining highly accurate mean redshifts for ensembles of galaxies $n(z)$ in all tomographic bins, essential for deriving robust cosmological constraints. However, photometric redshifts (photo-$z$s) suffer from systematic biases arising from various sources of uncertainty. To address these challenges, we utilised self-organising maps (SOMs) with mock samples resembling the Euclid Wide Survey (EWS), to validate Euclid's uncertainty requirement of $|\Delta\langle z \rangle| = \langle z_{\text{est}} \rangle - \langle z \rangle \leq 0.002 (1+z)$ per tomographic bin, assuming DR3-level data. We observe that defining the redshift tomography using the mean spectroscopic redshift (spec-$z$) per SOM cell, results in none of the ten tomographic redshift bins satisfying the requirement. In contrast, the redshift tomography on the photo-$z$s of the EWS-like sample yields superior results, with eight out of ten bins [$0 < z\leq 2.5$] meeting the Euclid requirement. To enhance the realism of our study, we morph our calibration sample to mimic the C3R2 survey in incremental steps. In this context, a maximum of six out of ten bins meet the requirement, strongly advocating the adoption of a redshift tomography defined by the photo-$z$s of individual galaxies rather than the commonly used mean spec-$z$ of SOM cells. To examine the impact on the expected biases for $\Omega_{\text{m}}$, $\sigma_{8}$, and $\Delta w_{0}$ measured by Euclid, we perform a Fisher forecast for cosmic shear only, based on our redshift uncertainties. Here, we find that even under an evaluation of the uncertainty where the impact of the redshift bias is substantial, most absolute biases remain below 0.1$\sigma$ in the idealised scenario and below 0.3$\sigma$ in the more realistic case.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

Euclid and KiDS-1000: Quantifying the impact of source-lens clustering on cosmic shear analyses

The transition from current Stage-III surveys such as the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) to the increased area and redshift range of Stage IV surveys such as Euclid will significantly increase the precision of weak lensing analyses. However, with increasing precision, the accuracy of model assumptions needs to be evaluated. In this study, we quantify the impact of the correlated clustering of weak lensing source galaxies with the surrounding large-scale structure, known as source-lens clustering (SLC), which is commonly neglected. For this, we use simulated cosmological datasets with realistically distributed galaxies and measure shear correlation functions for both clustered and uniformly distributed source galaxies. Cosmological analyses are performed for both scenarios to quantify the impact of SLC on parameter inference for a KiDS-like and a Euclid-like setting. We find for Stage III surveys, SLC has a minor impact when accounting for nuisance parameters for intrinsic alignments and shifts of tomographic bins, as these nuisance parameters absorb the effect of SLC, thus changing their original meaning. For KiDS (Euclid), the inferred intrinsic alignment amplitude $A_{IA}$ changes from $0.11_{-0.46}^{+0.44}$ ($-0.009_{-0.080}^{+0.079}$) for data without SLC to $0.28_{-0.44}^{+0.42}$ ($0.022_{-0.082}^{+0.081}$) with SLC. However, fixed nuisance parameters lead to shifts in $S_8$ and $\Omega_{m}$, emphasizing the need for including SLC in the modelling. For Euclid, we find that $\sigma_8$, $\Omega_m$, and $w_0$ are shifted by $0.19$, $0.12$, and $0.12\, \sigma$, respectively, when including free nuisance parameters, and by $0.20$, $0.16$, and $0.32\,\sigma$ when fixing the nuisance parameters. Consequently, SLC on its own has only a small impact on the inferred parameter inference when using uninformative priors for nuisance parameters.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2023

The N5K Challenge: Non-Limber Integration for LSST Cosmology

The rapidly increasing statistical power of cosmological imaging surveys requires us to reassess the regime of validity for various approximations that accelerate the calculation of relevant theoretical predictions. In this paper, we present the results of the 'N5K non-Limber integration challenge', the goal of which was to quantify the performance of different approaches to calculating the angular power spectrum of galaxy number counts and cosmic shear data without invoking the so-called 'Limber approximation', in the context of the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We quantify the performance, in terms of accuracy and speed, of three non-Limber implementations: ${\tt FKEM (CosmoLike)}$, ${\tt Levin}$, and ${\tt matter}$, themselves based on different integration schemes and approximations. We find that in the challenge's fiducial 3x2pt LSST Year 10 scenario, ${\tt FKEM (CosmoLike)}$ produces the fastest run time within the required accuracy by a considerable margin, positioning it favourably for use in Bayesian parameter inference. This method, however, requires further development and testing to extend its use to certain analysis scenarios, particularly those involving a scale-dependent growth rate. For this and other reasons discussed herein, alternative approaches such as ${\tt matter}$ and ${\tt Levin}$ may be necessary for a full exploration of parameter space. We also find that the usual first-order Limber approximation is insufficiently accurate for LSST Year 10 3x2pt analysis on $\ell=200-1000$, whereas invoking the second-order Limber approximation on these scales (with a full non-Limber method at smaller $\ell$) does suffice.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2018

Testing (modified) gravity with 3D and tomographic cosmic shear

Cosmic shear is one of the primary probes to test gravity with current and future surveys. There are two main techniques to analyse a cosmic shear survey; a tomographic method, where correlations between the lensing signal in different redshift bins are used to recover redshift information, and a 3D approach, where the full redshift information is carried through the entire analysis. Here we compare the two methods, by forecasting cosmological constraints for future surveys like Euclid. We extend the 3D formalism for the first time to theories beyond the standard model, belonging to the Horndeski class. This includes the majority of universally coupled extensions to $Λ$CDM with one scalar degree of freedom in addition to the metric, still in agreement with current observations. Given a fixed background, the evolution of linear perturbations in Horndeski gravity is described by a set of four functions of time only. We model their time evolution assuming proportionality to the dark energy density fraction and place Fisher matrix constraints on the proportionality coefficients. We find that a 3D analysis can constrain Horndeski theories better than a tomographic one, in particular with a decrease in the errors of the order of 20$\%$. This paper shows for the first time a quantitative comparison on an equal footing between Fisher matrix forecasts for both a fully 3D and a tomographic analysis of cosmic shear surveys. The increased sensitivity of the 3D formalism comes from its ability to retain information on the source redshifts along the entire analysis.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2018

3D cosmic shear: numerical challenges, 3D lensing random fields generation and Minkowski Functionals for cosmological inference

Cosmic shear - the weak gravitational lensing effect generated by fluctuations of the gravitational tidal fields of the large-scale structure - is one of the most promising tools for current and future cosmological analyses. The spherical-Bessel decomposition of the cosmic shear field ("3D cosmic shear") is one way to maximise the amount of redshift information in a lensing analysis and therefore provides a powerful tool to investigate in particular the growth of cosmic structure that is crucial for dark energy studies. However, the computation of simulated 3D cosmic shear covariance matrices presents numerical difficulties, due to the required integrations over highly oscillatory functions. We present and compare two numerical methods and relative implementations to perform these integrations. We then show how to generate 3D Gaussian random fields on the sky in spherical coordinates, starting from the 3D cosmic shear covariances. To validate our field-generation procedure, we calculate the Minkowski functionals associated with our random fields, compare them with the known expectation values for the Gaussian case and demonstrate parameter inference from Minkowski functionals from a cosmic shear survey. This is a first step towards producing fully 3D Minkowski functionals for a lognormal field in 3D to extract Gaussian and non-Gaussian information from the cosmic shear field, as well as towards the use of Minkowski functionals as a probe of cosmology beyond the commonly used two-point statistics.

astro-ph.CO↗