Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Raeed Mundow

Publications and source records attributed to Raeed Mundow.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reconstructing the Large-Scale Velocity Field from DESI DR1 with Bayesian Inference

Survey boundaries and nonlinear dynamics complicate reconstruction of large-scale matter-density and peculiar-velocity fields from galaxy redshift surveys. We develop and compare two reconstruction methods within a common Bayesian framework, based on linear perturbation theory and the Zel'dovich approximation, and apply them to the DESI Data Release 1 Bright Galaxy Survey. We infer the initial density field using a Gaussian prior and likelihood, with the Zel'dovich model displacing particles from a uniform Lagrangian grid. Both yield maximum a posteriori (MAP) fields; only the linear posterior is sampled. Our main findings are: \textit{(i)} Both reconstructions yield similar large-scale density structures and coherent velocity patterns in the survey interior, beyond roughly \(50\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}\) from the footprint boundaries. \textit{(ii)} Comparison with Cosmicflows-4 groups, predominantly from the SDSS Fundamental Plane sample in the DESI overlap, shows close agreement between mean observed radial velocities and MAP predictions when binned by the latter, despite substantial individual scatter. \textit{(iii)} Both yield similar reflex-dipole profiles, defined as mean shell velocities relative to those at randomly sampled centres, out to \(\sim225\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}\). The profiles depend weakly on the prior normalization \(σ_8\), but lie below the fiducial linear \(Λ\)CDM reference at \(r<50\,h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}\). Sparse sampling limits the largest radii. \textit{(iv)} In an exploratory BAO test, shifting galaxies and randoms to a target redshift \(z=8\) using reconstructed displacements sharpens the acoustic feature in both cases, with a slightly more pronounced peak for Zel'dovich. Survey geometry and galaxy bias remain the principal limitations.

astro-ph.CO↗

Estimating cluster masses: a comparative study between machine learning and maximum likelihood

We compare an autoencoder convolutional neural network (AE-CNN) with a conventional maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) for inferring cluster virial masses, $M_v$, directly from the galaxy distribution around clusters, without identifying members or interlopers. The AE-CNN is trained on mock galaxy catalogues, whereas the MLE assumes that clusters of similar mass share the same phase-space galaxy profile. Conceptually, the MLE returns an unbiased estimate of $\log M_v$ at fixed true mass, whereas the AE-CNN approximates the posterior mean, so the true $\log M_v$ is unbiased at fixed estimate. Using MDPL2 mock clusters with redshift space number density as input, the AE-CNN attains an rms scatter of $0.10\,\textrm{dex}$ between predicted and true $\log M_v$, compared with $0.16\,\textrm{dex}$ for the MLE. With inputs based on mean peculiar velocities, binned in redshift space or observed distance, the AE-CNN achieves scatters of $0.12\,\textrm{dex}$ and $0.16\,\textrm{dex}$, respectively, despite strong inhomogeneous Malmquist bias.

astro-ph.CO↗