arXiv subjects

Rafael Pinot

Publications and source records attributed to Rafael Pinot.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2023

On the Privacy-Robustness-Utility Trilemma in Distributed Learning

The ubiquity of distributed machine learning (ML) in sensitive public domain applications calls for algorithms that protect data privacy, while being robust to faults and adversarial behaviors. Although privacy and robustness have been extensively studied independently in distributed ML, their synthesis remains poorly understood. We present the first tight analysis of the error incurred by any algorithm ensuring robustness against a fraction of adversarial machines, as well as differential privacy (DP) for honest machines' data against any other curious entity. Our analysis exhibits a fundamental trade-off between privacy, robustness, and utility. To prove our lower bound, we consider the case of mean estimation, subject to distributed DP and robustness constraints, and devise reductions to centralized estimation of one-way marginals. We prove our matching upper bound by presenting a new distributed ML algorithm using a high-dimensional robust aggregation rule. The latter amortizes the dependence on the dimension in the error (caused by adversarial workers and DP), while being agnostic to the statistical properties of the data.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

On the Impossible Safety of Large AI Models

Large AI Models (LAIMs), of which large language models are the most prominent recent example, showcase some impressive performance. However they have been empirically found to pose serious security issues. This paper systematizes our knowledge about the fundamental impossibility of building arbitrarily accurate and secure machine learning models. More precisely, we identify key challenging features of many of today's machine learning settings. Namely, high accuracy seems to require memorizing large training datasets, which are often user-generated and highly heterogeneous, with both sensitive information and fake users. We then survey statistical lower bounds that, we argue, constitute a compelling case against the possibility of designing high-accuracy LAIMs with strong security guarantees.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Fixing by Mixing: A Recipe for Optimal Byzantine ML under Heterogeneity

Byzantine machine learning (ML) aims to ensure the resilience of distributed learning algorithms to misbehaving (or Byzantine) machines. Although this problem received significant attention, prior works often assume the data held by the machines to be homogeneous, which is seldom true in practical settings. Data heterogeneity makes Byzantine ML considerably more challenging, since a Byzantine machine can hardly be distinguished from a non-Byzantine outlier. A few solutions have been proposed to tackle this issue, but these provide suboptimal probabilistic guarantees and fare poorly in practice. This paper closes the theoretical gap, achieving optimality and inducing good empirical results. In fact, we show how to automatically adapt existing solutions for (homogeneous) Byzantine ML to the heterogeneous setting through a powerful mechanism, we call nearest neighbor mixing (NNM), which boosts any standard robust distributed gradient descent variant to yield optimal Byzantine resilience under heterogeneity. We obtain similar guarantees (in expectation) by plugging NNM in the distributed stochastic heavy ball method, a practical substitute to distributed gradient descent. We obtain empirical results that significantly outperform state-of-the-art Byzantine ML solutions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Towards Evading the Limits of Randomized Smoothing: A Theoretical Analysis

Randomized smoothing is the dominant standard for provable defenses against adversarial examples. Nevertheless, this method has recently been proven to suffer from important information theoretic limitations. In this paper, we argue that these limitations are not intrinsic, but merely a byproduct of current certification methods. We first show that these certificates use too little information about the classifier, and are in particular blind to the local curvature of the decision boundary. This leads to severely sub-optimal robustness guarantees as the dimension of the problem increases. We then show that it is theoretically possible to bypass this issue by collecting more information about the classifier. More precisely, we show that it is possible to approximate the optimal certificate with arbitrary precision, by probing the decision boundary with several noise distributions. Since this process is executed at certification time rather than at test time, it entails no loss in natural accuracy while enhancing the quality of the certificates. This result fosters further research on classifier-specific certification and demonstrates that randomized smoothing is still worth investigating. Although classifier-specific certification may induce more computational cost, we also provide some theoretical insight on how to mitigate it.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Byzantine Machine Learning Made Easy by Resilient Averaging of Momentums

Byzantine resilience emerged as a prominent topic within the distributed machine learning community. Essentially, the goal is to enhance distributed optimization algorithms, such as distributed SGD, in a way that guarantees convergence despite the presence of some misbehaving (a.k.a., {\em Byzantine}) workers. Although a myriad of techniques addressing the problem have been proposed, the field arguably rests on fragile foundations. These techniques are hard to prove correct and rely on assumptions that are (a) quite unrealistic, i.e., often violated in practice, and (b) heterogeneous, i.e., making it difficult to compare approaches. We present \emph{RESAM (RESilient Averaging of Momentums)}, a unified framework that makes it simple to establish optimal Byzantine resilience, relying only on standard machine learning assumptions. Our framework is mainly composed of two operators: \emph{resilient averaging} at the server and \emph{distributed momentum} at the workers. We prove a general theorem stating the convergence of distributed SGD under RESAM. Interestingly, demonstrating and comparing the convergence of many existing techniques become direct corollaries of our theorem, without resorting to stringent assumptions. We also present an empirical evaluation of the practical relevance of RESAM.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Towards Consistency in Adversarial Classification

In this paper, we study the problem of consistency in the context of adversarial examples. Specifically, we tackle the following question: can surrogate losses still be used as a proxy for minimizing the $0/1$ loss in the presence of an adversary that alters the inputs at test-time? Different from the standard classification task, this question cannot be reduced to a point-wise minimization problem, and calibration needs not to be sufficient to ensure consistency. In this paper, we expose some pathological behaviors specific to the adversarial problem, and show that no convex surrogate loss can be consistent or calibrated in this context. It is therefore necessary to design another class of surrogate functions that can be used to solve the adversarial consistency issue. As a first step towards designing such a class, we identify sufficient and necessary conditions for a surrogate loss to be calibrated in both the adversarial and standard settings. Finally, we give some directions for building a class of losses that could be consistent in the adversarial framework.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

SPEED: Secure, PrivatE, and Efficient Deep learning

We introduce a deep learning framework able to deal with strong privacy constraints. Based on collaborative learning, differential privacy and homomorphic encryption, the proposed approach advances state-of-the-art of private deep learning against a wider range of threats, in particular the honest-but-curious server assumption. We address threats from both the aggregation server, the global model and potentially colluding data holders. Building upon distributed differential privacy and a homomorphic argmax operator, our method is specifically designed to maintain low communication loads and efficiency. The proposed method is supported by carefully crafted theoretical results. We provide differential privacy guarantees from the point of view of any entity having access to the final model, including colluding data holders, as a function of the ratio of data holders who kept their noise secret. This makes our method practical to real-life scenarios where data holders do not trust any third party to process their datasets nor the other data holders. Crucially the computational burden of the approach is maintained reasonable, and, to the best of our knowledge, our framework is the first one to be efficient enough to investigate deep learning applications while addressing such a large scope of threats. To assess the practical usability of our framework, experiments have been carried out on image datasets in a classification context. We present numerical results that show that the learning procedure is both accurate and private.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2021

On the robustness of randomized classifiers to adversarial examples

This paper investigates the theory of robustness against adversarial attacks. We focus on randomized classifiers (\emph{i.e.} classifiers that output random variables) and provide a thorough analysis of their behavior through the lens of statistical learning theory and information theory. To this aim, we introduce a new notion of robustness for randomized classifiers, enforcing local Lipschitzness using probability metrics. Equipped with this definition, we make two new contributions. The first one consists in devising a new upper bound on the adversarial generalization gap of randomized classifiers. More precisely, we devise bounds on the generalization gap and the adversarial gap (\emph{i.e.} the gap between the risk and the worst-case risk under attack) of randomized classifiers. The second contribution presents a yet simple but efficient noise injection method to design robust randomized classifiers. We show that our results are applicable to a wide range of machine learning models under mild hypotheses. We further corroborate our findings with experimental results using deep neural networks on standard image datasets, namely CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. All robust models we trained models can simultaneously achieve state-of-the-art accuracy (over $0.82$ clean accuracy on CIFAR-10) and enjoy \emph{guaranteed} robust accuracy bounds ($0.45$ against $\ell_2$ adversaries with magnitude $0.5$ on CIFAR-10).

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Mixed Nash Equilibria in the Adversarial Examples Game

This paper tackles the problem of adversarial examples from a game theoretic point of view. We study the open question of the existence of mixed Nash equilibria in the zero-sum game formed by the attacker and the classifier. While previous works usually allow only one player to use randomized strategies, we show the necessity of considering randomization for both the classifier and the attacker. We demonstrate that this game has no duality gap, meaning that it always admits approximate Nash equilibria. We also provide the first optimization algorithms to learn a mixture of classifiers that approximately realizes the value of this game, \emph{i.e.} procedures to build an optimally robust randomized classifier.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Randomization matters. How to defend against strong adversarial attacks

Is there a classifier that ensures optimal robustness against all adversarial attacks? This paper answers this question by adopting a game-theoretic point of view. We show that adversarial attacks and defenses form an infinite zero-sum game where classical results (e.g. Sion theorem) do not apply. We demonstrate the non-existence of a Nash equilibrium in our game when the classifier and the Adversary are both deterministic, hence giving a negative answer to the above question in the deterministic regime. Nonetheless, the question remains open in the randomized regime. We tackle this problem by showing that, undermild conditions on the dataset distribution, any deterministic classifier can be outperformed by a randomized one. This gives arguments for using randomization, and leads us to a new algorithm for building randomized classifiers that are robust to strong adversarial attacks. Empirical results validate our theoretical analysis, and show that our defense method considerably outperforms Adversarial Training against state-of-the-art attacks.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Advocating for Multiple Defense Strategies against Adversarial Examples

It has been empirically observed that defense mechanisms designed to protect neural networks against $\ell_\infty$ adversarial examples offer poor performance against $\ell_2$ adversarial examples and vice versa. In this paper we conduct a geometrical analysis that validates this observation. Then, we provide a number of empirical insights to illustrate the effect of this phenomenon in practice. Then, we review some of the existing defense mechanism that attempts to defend against multiple attacks by mixing defense strategies. Thanks to our numerical experiments, we discuss the relevance of this method and state open questions for the adversarial examples community.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Robust Neural Networks using Randomized Adversarial Training

This paper tackles the problem of defending a neural network against adversarial attacks crafted with different norms (in particular $\ell_\infty$ and $\ell_2$ bounded adversarial examples). It has been observed that defense mechanisms designed to protect against one type of attacks often offer poor performance against the other. We show that $\ell_\infty$ defense mechanisms cannot offer good protection against $\ell_2$ attacks and vice-versa, and we provide both theoretical and empirical insights on this phenomenon. Then, we discuss various ways of combining existing defense mechanisms in order to train neural networks robust against both types of attacks. Our experiments show that these new defense mechanisms offer better protection when attacked with both norms.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

A unified view on differential privacy and robustness to adversarial examples

This short note highlights some links between two lines of research within the emerging topic of trustworthy machine learning: differential privacy and robustness to adversarial examples. By abstracting the definitions of both notions, we show that they build upon the same theoretical ground and hence results obtained so far in one domain can be transferred to the other. More precisely, our analysis is based on two key elements: probabilistic mappings (also called randomized algorithms in the differential privacy community), and the Renyi divergence which subsumes a large family of divergences. We first generalize the definition of robustness against adversarial examples to encompass probabilistic mappings. Then we observe that Renyi-differential privacy (a generalization of differential privacy recently proposed in~\cite{Mironov2017RenyiDP}) and our definition of robustness share several similarities. We finally discuss how can both communities benefit from this connection to transfer technical tools from one research field to the other.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

Theoretical evidence for adversarial robustness through randomization

This paper investigates the theory of robustness against adversarial attacks. It focuses on the family of randomization techniques that consist in injecting noise in the network at inference time. These techniques have proven effective in many contexts, but lack theoretical arguments. We close this gap by presenting a theoretical analysis of these approaches, hence explaining why they perform well in practice. More precisely, we make two new contributions. The first one relates the randomization rate to robustness to adversarial attacks. This result applies for the general family of exponential distributions, and thus extends and unifies the previous approaches. The second contribution consists in devising a new upper bound on the adversarial generalization gap of randomized neural networks. We support our theoretical claims with a set of experiments.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Graph-based Clustering under Differential Privacy

In this paper, we present the first differentially private clustering method for arbitrary-shaped node clusters in a graph. This algorithm takes as input only an approximate Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) $\mathcal{T}$ released under weight differential privacy constraints from the graph. Then, the underlying nonconvex clustering partition is successfully recovered from cutting optimal cuts on $\mathcal{T}$. As opposed to existing methods, our algorithm is theoretically well-motivated. Experiments support our theoretical findings.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Minimum spanning tree release under differential privacy constraints

We investigate the problem of nodes clustering under privacy constraints when representing a dataset as a graph. Our contribution is threefold. First we formally define the concept of differential privacy for structured databases such as graphs, and give an alternative definition based on a new neighborhood notion between graphs. This definition is adapted to particular frameworks that can be met in various application fields such as genomics, world wide web, population survey, etc. Second, we introduce a new algorithm to tackle the issue of privately releasing an approximated minimum spanning tree topology for a simple-undirected-weighted graph. It provides a simple way of producing the topology of a private almost minimum spanning tree which outperforms, in most cases, the state of the art "Laplace mechanism" in terms of weight-approximation error. Finally, we propose a theoretically motivated method combining a sanitizing mechanism (such as Laplace or our new algorithm) with a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)-based clustering algorithm. It provides an accurate method for nodes clustering in a graph while keeping the sensitive information contained in the edges weights of the private graph. We provide some theoretical results on the robustness of an almost minimum spanning tree construction for Laplace sanitizing mechanisms. These results exhibit which conditions the graph weights should respect in order to consider that the nodes form well separated clusters both for Laplace and our algorithm as sanitizing mechanism. The method has been experimentally evaluated on simulated data, and preliminary results show the good behavior of the algorithm while identifying well separated clusters.

cs.CR↗