SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Raj K. Velicheti

Publications and source records attributed to Raj K. Velicheti.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Design of Experiments with Imputable Feature Data: An Entropy-Based Approach

Tactical selection of experiments to estimate an underlying model is an innate task across various fields. Since each experiment has costs associated with it, selecting statistically significant experiments becomes necessary. Classic linear experimental design deals with experiment selection so as to minimize (functions of) variance in estimation of regression parameter. Typically, standard algorithms for solving this problem assume that data associated with each experiment is fully known. This isn't often true since missing data is a common problem. For instance, remote sensors often miss data due to poor connection. Hence experiment selection under such scenarios is a widespread but challenging task. Though decoupling the tasks and using standard data imputation methods like matrix completion followed by experiment selection might seem a way forward, they perform sub-optimally since the tasks are naturally interdependent. Standard design of experiments is an NP hard problem, and the additional objective of imputing for missing data amplifies the computational complexity. In this paper, we propose a maximum-entropy-principle based framework that simultaneously addresses the problem of design of experiments as well as the imputation of missing data. Our algorithm exploits homotopy from a suitably chosen convex function to the non-convex cost function; hence avoiding poor local minima. Further, our proposed framework is flexible to incorporate additional application specific constraints. Simulations on various datasets show improvement in the cost value by over 60% in comparison to benchmark algorithms applied sequentially to the imputation and experiment selection problems.

math.OC

On Determining and Qualifying the Number of Superstates in Aggregation of Markov Chains

Many studies involving large Markov chains require determining a smaller representative (aggregated) chains. Each {\em superstate} in the representative chain represents a {\em group of related} states in the original Markov chain. Typically, the choice of number of superstates in the aggregated chain is ambiguous, and based on the limited prior know-how. In this paper we present a structured methodology of determining the best candidate for the number of superstates. We achieve this by comparing aggregated chains of different sizes. To facilitate this comparison we develop and quantify a notion of {\em marginal return}. Our notion captures the decrease in the {\em heterogeneity} within the group of the {\em related} states (i.e., states represented by the same superstate) upon a unit increase in the number of superstates in the aggregated chain. We use Maximum Entropy Principle to justify the notion of marginal return, as well as our quantification of heterogeneity. Through simulations on synthetic Markov chains, where the number of superstates are known apriori, we show that the aggregated chain with the largest marginal return identifies this number. In case of Markov chains that model real-life scenarios we show that the aggregated model with the largest marginal return identifies an inherent structure unique to the scenario being modelled; thus, substantiating on the efficacy of our proposed methodology.

eess.SY