SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Rajiv Sangle

Publications and source records attributed to Rajiv Sangle.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Model selection in hybrid quantum neural networks with applications to quantum transformer architectures

Quantum machine learning models generally lack principled design guidelines, often requiring full resource-intensive training across numerous choices of encodings, quantum circuit designs and initialization strategies to find effective configuration. To address this challenge, we develope the Quantum Bias-Expressivity Toolbox ($\texttt{QBET}$), a framework for evaluating quantum, classical, and hybrid transformer architectures. In this toolbox, we introduce lean metrics for Simplicity Bias ($\texttt{SB}$) and Expressivity ($\texttt{EXP}$), for comparing across various models, and extend the analysis of $\texttt{SB}$ to generative and multiclass-classification tasks. We show that $\texttt{QBET}$ enables efficient pre-screening of promising model variants obviating the need to execute complete training pipelines. In evaluations on transformer-based classification and generative tasks we employ a total of $18$ qubits for embeddings ($6$ qubits each for query, key, and value). We identify scenarios in which quantum self-attention variants surpass their classical counterparts by ranking the respective models according to the $\texttt{SB}$ metric and comparing their relative performance.

quant-ph

Quantum Generative Adversarial Autoencoders: Learning latent representations for quantum data generation

In this work, we introduce the Quantum Generative Adversarial Autoencoder (QGAA), a quantum model for generation of quantum data. The QGAA consists of two components: (a) Quantum Autoencoder (QAE) to compress quantum states, and (b) Quantum Generative Adversarial Network (QGAN) to learn the latent space of the trained QAE. This approach imparts the QAE with generative capabilities. The utility of QGAA is demonstrated in two representative scenarios: (a) generation of pure entangled states, and (b) generation of parameterized molecular ground states for H$_2$ and LiH. The average errors in the energies estimated by the trained QGAA are 0.02 Ha for H$_2$ and 0.06 Ha for LiH in simulations upto 6 qubits. These results illustrate the potential of QGAA for quantum state generation, quantum chemistry, and near-term quantum machine learning applications.

quant-ph

Parallelizing Quantum-Classical Workloads: Profiling the Impact of Splitting Techniques

Quantum computers are the next evolution of computing hardware. Quantum devices are being exposed through the same familiar cloud platforms used for classical computers, and enabling seamless execution of hybrid applications that combine quantum and classical components. Quantum devices vary in features, e.g., number of qubits, quantum volume, CLOPS, noise profile, queuing delays and resource cost. So, it may be useful to split hybrid workloads with either large quantum circuits or large number of quantum circuits, into smaller units. In this paper, we profile two workload splitting techniques on IBM's Quantum Cloud: (1) Circuit parallelization, to split one large circuit into multiple smaller ones, and (2) Data parallelization to split a large number of circuits run on one hardware to smaller batches of circuits run on different hardware. These can improve the utilization of heterogenous quantum hardware, but involve trade-offs. We evaluate these techniques on two key algorithmic classes: Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM), and measure the impact on circuit execution times, pre- and post-processing overhead, and quality of the result relative to a baseline without parallelization. Results are obtained on real hardware and complemented by simulations. We see that (1) VQE with circuit cutting is ~39\% better in ground state estimation than the uncut version, and (2) QSVM that combines data parallelization with reduced feature set yields upto 3x improvement in quantum workload execution time and reduces quantum resource use by 3x, while providing comparable accuracy. Error mitigation can improve the accuracy by ~7\% and resource foot-print by ~4\% compared to the best case among the considered scenarios.

quant-ph