arXiv subjects

Ravit Helled

Publications and source records attributed to Ravit Helled.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Forming Iron-rich Planets with Giant Impacts

We investigate mantle stripping giant impacts (GI) between super-Earths with masses between 1 M$_{\oplus}$ and 20 M$_{\oplus}$. We infer new scaling laws for the mass of the largest fragment and its iron mass fraction, as well as updated fitting coefficients for the critical specific impact energy for catastrophic disruption, $Q_{RD}^{*}$. With these scaling laws, we derive equations that relate the impact conditions, i.e., target mass, impact velocity and impactor-to-target mass ratio, to the mass and iron mass fraction of the largest fragment. This allows one to predict collision outcomes without performing a large suite of simulations. Using these equations we present the maximum and minimum planetary iron mass fraction as a result of collisional stripping of its mantle for a given range of impact conditions. We also infer the radius for a given mass and composition using interior structure models and compare our results to observations of metal-rich exoplanets. We find good agreement between the data and the simulated planets suggesting that GI could have played a key role in their formation. Furthermore, using our scaling laws we can further constrain the impact conditions that favour their masses and compositions. Finally, we present a flexible and easy-to-use tool that allows one to predict mass and composition of a planet after a GI for an arbitrary range of impact conditions which in turn allows to assess the role of GI in observed planetary systems.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Constraining the origin of giant exoplanets via elemental abundance measurements

The origin of close-in giant planets is a key open question in planet formation theory. The two leading models are (i) formation at the outer disk followed by migration and (ii) in situ formation. In this work we determine the atmospheric composition of warm Jupiters for both formation scenarios. We perform N-body simulations of planetesimal accretion interior and exterior to the water ice-line for various planetary formation locations, planetary masses, and planetesimal sizes to estimate the accreted heavy-element mass and final planetary composition. We find that the two models differ significantly: migrating giant planets have 2-14 times higher metallicities than planets that form in situ. The ratio between refractories and volatiles is found to be above one for migrating planets but below 0.4 for planets that form in situ. We also identify very different trends between heavy-element enrichment and planetary mass for these two formation mechanisms. While the metallicity of migrating planets is found to increase with decreasing planetary mass, it is about constant for in situ formation. Our study highlights the importance of measuring the atmospheric composition of warm Jupiters and its connection to their formation and evolutionary paths.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Jupiter's Temperature Structure: A Reassessment of the Voyager Radio Occultation Measurements

The thermal structure of planetary atmospheres is an essential input for predicting and retrieving the distribution of gases and aerosols, as well as the bulk chemical abundances. In the case of Jupiter, the temperature at a reference level - generally taken at 1 bar - serves as the anchor in models used to derive the planet's interior structure and composition. Most models assume the temperature measured by the Galileo probe (Seiff et al. 1998). However, those data correspond to a single location, an unusually clear, dry region, affected by local atmospheric dynamics. On the other hand, the Voyager radio occultation observations cover a wider range of latitudes, longitudes, and times (Lindal et al. 1981). The Voyager retrievals were based on atmospheric composition and radio refractivity data that require updating and were never properly tabulated: the few existing tabulations are incomplete and ambiguous. Here, we present a systematic electronic digitization of all available temperature profiles from Voyager, followed by their reanalysis, employing currently accepted values of the abundances and radio refractivities of atmospheric species. We find the corrected temperature at the 1 bar level to be up to 4 K greater than previously published values, i.e., 170.3{\pm}3.8 K at 12°S (Voyager 1 ingress) and 167.3{\pm}3.8 K at 0°N (Voyager 1 egress). This is to be compared with the Galileo probe value of 166.1{\pm}0.8 K at the edge of an unusual feature at 6.57°N. Altogether, this suggests that Jupiter's tropospheric temperatures may vary spatially by up to 7 K between 7°N and 12°S.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Potential long-term habitable conditions on planets with primordial H-He atmospheres

Cold super-Earths which retain their primordial, H-He dominated atmosphere could have surfaces that are warm enough to host liquid water. This would be due to the collision induced absorption (CIA) of infra-red light by hydrogen, which increases with pressure. However, the long-term potential for habitability of such planet has not been explored yet. Here we investigate the duration of this potential exotic habitability by simulating planets of different core masses, envelope masses and semi-major axes. We find that terrestrial and super-Earth planets with masses of $\sim$1 - 10$M_{\oplus}$ can maintain temperate surface conditions up to 5 - 8 Gyr at radial distances larger than $\sim $2 AU. The required envelope masses are $\sim 10^{-4} \, M_{\oplus}$ (which is 2 orders of magnitude more massive than Earth's), but can be an order of magnitude smaller (when close-in) or larger (when far out). This result suggests that the concept of planetary habitability should be revisited and made more inclusive with respect to the classical definition.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Giant Planets from the Inside-Out

Giant planets acquire gas, ices and rocks during the early formation stages of planetary systems and thus inform us on the formation process itself. Proceeding from inside out, examining the connections between the deep interiors and the observable atmospheres, linking detailed measurements on giant planets in the solar system to the wealth of data on brown dwarfs and giant exoplanets, we aim to provide global constraints on interiors structure and composition for models of the formation of these planets. New developments after the Juno and Cassini missions point to both Jupiter and Saturn having strong compositional gradients and stable regions from the atmosphere to the deep interior. This is also the case of Uranus and Neptune, based on available, limited data on these planets. Giant exoplanets and brown dwarfs provide us with new opportunities to link atmospheric abundances to bulk, interior abundances \rev{and to link these abundances and isotopic ratios to formation scenarios. Analysing the wealth of data becoming available} will require new models accounting for the complexity of the planetary interiors and atmospheres

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

The rotation of planet-hosting stars

Understanding the distribution of angular momentum during the formation of planetary systems is a key topic in astrophysics. Data from the $\textit{Kepler}$ and $\textit{Gaia}$ missions allow to investigate whether stellar rotation is correlated with the presence of planets around Sun-like stars. Here, we perform a statistical analysis of the rotation period of 493 planet-hosting stars. These are matched to a control sample, without detected planets, with similar effective temperatures, masses, radii, metallicities, and ages. We find that planet-hosting stars rotate on average $1.63 \pm 0.40$ days slower. The difference in rotation is statistically significant both in samples including and not including planets confirmed by radial velocity follow-up observations. We also analyse the dependence of rotation distribution on various stellar and planetary properties. Our results could potentially be explained by planet detection biases depending on the rotation period of their host stars in both RV and transit methods. Alternatively, they could point to a physical link between the existence of planets and stellar rotation, emphasising the need to understand the role of angular momentum in the formation and evolution planetary systems.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Possible in situ formation of Uranus and Neptune via Pebble Accretion

The origin of Uranus and Neptune is still unknown. In particular, it has been challenging for planet formation models to form the planets in their current radial distances within the expected lifetime of the solar nebula. In this paper, we simulate the in-situ formation of Uranus and Neptune via pebble accretion and show that both planets can form within ~ 3 Myr at their current locations, and have final compositions that are consistent with the heavy-element to H-He ratios predicted by structure models. We find that Uranus and Neptune could have been formed at their current locations. In several cases a few earth masses of heavy elements are missing, suggesting that Uranus and/or Neptune may have accreted $\sim$1 -- 3 M Earth's mass of heavy elements after their formation via planetesimal accretion and/or giant impacts.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Empirical Structure Models of Uranus and Neptune

Uranus and Neptune are still poorly understood. Their gravitational fields, rotation periods, atmosphere dynamics, and internal structures are not well determined. In this paper we present empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune where the density profiles are represented by polytropes. By using these models, that are set to fit the planetary gravity field, we predict the higher order gravitational coefficients $J_6$ and $J_8$ for various assumed rotation periods, wind depths, and uncertainty of the low-order harmonics. We show that faster rotation and/or deep winds favour centrally concentrated density distributions. We demonstrate that an accurate determination of $J_6$ or $J_8$ with a relative uncertainty no larger than $10\%$ could constrain wind depths of Uranus and Neptune. We also confirm that the Voyager rotation periods are inconsistent with the measured shapes of Uranus and Neptune. We next demonstrate that more accurate determination of the gravity field can significantly reduce the possible range of internal structures. Finally, we suggest that an accurate measurement of the moment of inertia of Uranus and Neptune with a relative uncertainty of $\sim1\%$ and $\sim0.1\%$, could constrain their rotation periods and depths of the winds, respectively.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

A low accretion efficiency of planetesimals formed at planetary gap edges

Observations and models of giant planets indicate that such objects are enriched in heavy elements compared to solar abundances. The prevailing view is that giant planets accreted multiple Earth masses of heavy elements after the end of core formation. Such late solid enrichment is commonly explained by the accretion of planetesimals. Planetesimals are expected to form at the edges of planetary gaps, and here we address the question of whether these planetesimals can be accreted in large enough amounts to explain the inferred high heavy element contents of giant planets. We perform a series of N-body simulations of the dynamics of planetesimals and planets during the planetary growth phase, taking into account gas drag as well as the enhanced collision cross-section caused by the extended envelopes. We consider the growth of Jupiter and Saturn via gas accretion after reaching the pebble isolation mass and we include their migration in an evolving disk. We find that the accretion efficiency of planetesimals formed at planetary gap edges is very low: less than 10% of the formed planetesimals are accreted even in the most favorable cases, which in our model corresponds to a few Earth-masses. When planetesimals are assumed to form beyond the feeding zone of the planets, extending to a few Hill radii from a planet, accretion becomes negligible. Furthermore, we find that the accretion efficiency increases when the planetary migration distance is increased and that the efficiency does not increase when the planetesimal radii are decreased. Based on these results we conclude that it is difficult to explain the large heavy element content of giant planets with planetesimal accretion during the gas accretion phase. Alternative processes most likely are required, e.g. accretion of vapor deposited by drifting pebbles.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

The nature of gas giant planets

Revealing the true nature of the gas giant planets in our Solar System is challenging. The masses of Jupiter and Saturn are about 318 and 95 Earth masses, respectively. While they mostly consist of hydrogen and helium, the total mass and distribution of the heavier elements, which reveal information on their origin, are still unknown. Recent accurate measurements of the gravitational fields of Jupiter and Saturn together with knowledge of the behavior of planetary materials at high pressures allow us to better constrain their interiors. Updated structure models of Jupiter and Saturn suggest that both planets have complex interiors that include composition inhomogeneities, non-convective regions, and fuzzy cores. In addition, it is clear that there are significant differences between Jupiter and Saturn and that each giant planet is unique. This has direct implications for giant exoplanet characterization and for our understanding of gaseous planets as a class of astronomical objects. In this review we summarize the methods used to model giant planet interiors and recent developments in giant planet structure models.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Revelations on Jupiter's Formation, Evolution and Interior: Challenges from Juno Results

The Juno mission has revolutionized and challenged our understanding of Jupiter. As Juno transitioned to its extended mission, we review the major findings of Jupiter's internal structure relevant to understanding Jupiter's formation and evolution. Results from Juno's investigation of Jupiter's interior structure imply that the planet has compositional gradients and is accordingly non-adiabatic, with a complex internal structure. These new results imply that current models of Jupiter's formation and evolution require a revision. In this paper, we discuss potential formation and evolution paths that can lead to an internal structure model consistent with Juno data, and the constraints they provide. We note that standard core accretion formation models, including the heavy-element enrichment during planetary growth is consistent with an interior that is inhomogeneous with composition gradients in its deep interior. However, such formation models typically predict that this region, which could be interpreted as a primordial dilute core, is confined to about 10% of Jupiter's total mass. In contrast, structure models that fit Juno data imply that this region contains 30% of the mass or more. One way to explain the origin of this extended region is by invoking a relatively long (about 2 Myrs) formation phase where the growing planet accretes gas and planetesimals delaying the runaway gas accretion. Alternatively, Jupiter's fuzzy core could be a result of a giant impact or convection post-formation. These novel scenarios require somewhat special and specific conditions. Clarity on the plausibility of such conditions could come from future high-resolution observations of planet-forming regions around other stars, from the observed and modeled architectures of extrasolar systems with giant planets, and future Juno data obtained during its extended mission.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2022

Enrichment of Jupiter's atmosphere by late planetesimal bombardment

Jupiter's atmosphere is enriched with heavy elements by a factor of about 3 compared to proto-solar. The origin of this enrichment and whether it represent the bulk composition of the planetary envelope remain unknown. Internal structure models of Jupiter suggest that its envelope is separated from the deep interior and that the planet is not fully mixed. This implies that Jupiter's atmosphere was enriched with heavy elements just before the end of its formation. Such enrichment can be a result of late planetesimal accretion. However, in-situ Jupiter formation models suggest the decreasing accretion rate with increasing planetary mass, which cannot explain Jupiter's atmospheric enrichment. In this study, we model Jupiter's formation and show that an migration of proto-Jupiter from $\sim$ 20 AU to its current location can lead to a late planetesimal accretion and atmospheric enrichment. Late planetesimal accretion does not occur if proto-Jupiter migrates only a few AU. We suggest that if Jupiter's outermost layer is fully-mixed and is relatively thin (up to $\sim$ 20\% of its mass), such late accretion can explain its measured atmospheric composition. It is therefore possible that Jupiter underwent significant orbital migration followed by late planetesimal accretion.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2021

The origin of the high metallicity of close-in giant exoplanets II The nature of the sweet spot for accretion

The composition of giant planets reflects their formation history. Planetesimal accretion during the phase of planetary migration could lead to the delivery of heavy elements into giant planets. In our previous paper (Shibata et al. 2020) we showed that planetesimal accretion during planetary migration occurs in a rather narrow region of the protoplanetary disk, which we refer as "the sweet spot for accretion". The goal of this paper is to reveal the nature of the sweet spot and investigate the role of the sweet spot in determining the composition of gas giant planets. We analytically derive the required conditions for the sweet spot. Then, we compare the derived equations with the numerical simulations. We find that the conditions required for the sweet spot can be expressed by the ratio of the gas damping timescale of the planetesimal orbits and the planetary migration timescale. If the planetary migration timescale depends on the surface density of disk gas inversely, the location of the sweet spot does not change with the disk evolution. The mass of planetesimals accreted by the planet depends on the amount of planetesimals that are shepherded by mean motion resonances. Our analysis suggests that tens Earth-mass of planetesimals can be shepherded into the sweet spot without planetesimal collisions. However, as more planetesimals are trapped into mean motion resonances, collisional cascade can lead to fragmentation of planetesimals. This could affect the location of the sweet spot and the population of small objects in planetary systems. We conclude that the composition of gas giant planets depends on whether the planets crossed the sweet spot during their formation. Constraining the metallicity of cold giant planets, that are expected to be outer than the sweet spot, would reveal key information for understanding the origin of heavy elements in giant planets.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2021

Did Uranus' regular moons form via a rocky giant impactor?

The formation of Uranus' regular moons has been suggested to be linked to the origin of its enormous spin axial tilt (~98^o). A giant impact between proto-Uranus and a 2-3 M_Earth impactor could lead to a large tilt and to the formation of an impact generated disc, where prograde and circular satellites are accreted. The most intriguing features of the current regular Uranian satellite system is that it possesses a positive trend in the mass-distance distribution and likely also in the bulk density, implying that viscous spreading of the disc after the giant impact plays a crucial role in shaping the architecture of the final system. In this paper, we investigate the formation of Uranus' satellites by combining results of SPH simulations for the giant impact, a 1D semi-analytic disc model for viscous spreading of the post-impact disc, and N-body simulations for the assembly of satellites from a disc of moonlets. Assuming the condensed rock (i.e., silicate) remains small and available to stick onto the relatively rapid growing condensed water-ice, we find that the best case in reproducing the observed mass and bulk composition of Uranus' satellite system is a pure-rocky impactor with 3 M_Earth colliding with the young Uranus with an impact parameter b = 0.75. Such an oblique collision could also naturally explain Uranus' large tilt and possibly, its low internal heat flux. The giant impact scenario can naturally explain the key features of Uranus and its regular moons. We therefore suggest that the Uranian satellite system formed as a result of an impact rather than from a circumplanetary disc.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2021

Interior Structure Models Of Venus

Venus' mass and radius are similar to those of Earth. However, dissimilarities in atmospheric properties, geophysical activity and magnetic field generation could hint towards significant differences in the chemical composition and interior evolution of the two planets. Although various explanations for the differences between Venus and Earth have been proposed, the currently available data are insufficient to discriminate among the different solutions. Here we investigate the possible range of Venus structure models. We assume that core segregation happened as a single-stage event. The mantle composition is inferred from the core composition using a prescription for metal-silicate partitioning. We consider three different cases for the composition of Venus defined via the bulk Si and Mg content, and the core's S content. Permissible ranges for the core size, mantle and core composition as well as the normalized moment of inertia (MoI) are presented for these compositions. A solid inner core could exist for all compositions. We estimate that Venus' MoI is 0.317-0.351 and its core size 2930-4350 km for all assumed compositions. Higher MoI values correspond to more oxidizing conditions during core segregation. A determination of the abundance of FeO in Venus' mantle by future missions could further constrain its composition and internal structure. This can reveal important information on Venus' formation and evolution, and possibly, the reasons for the differences between Venus and our home planet.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2021

A wide-orbit giant planet in the high-mass b Centauri binary system

Planet formation occurs around a wide range of stellar masses and stellar system architectures. An improved understanding of the formation process can be achieved by studying it across the full parameter space, particularly toward the extremes. Earlier studies of planets in close-in orbits around high-mass stars have revealed an increase in giant planet frequency with increasing stellar mass until a turnover point at 1.9 solar masses, above which the frequency rapidly decreases. This could potentially imply that planet formation is impeded around more massive stars, and that giant planets around stars exceeding 3 solar masses may be rare or non-existent. However, the methods used to detect planets in small orbits are insensitive to planets in wide orbits. Here we demonstrate the existence of a planet at 560 times the Sun-Earth distance from the 6-10 solar mass binary b Centauri through direct imaging. The planet-to-star mass ratio of 0.10-0.17% is similar to the Jupiter-Sun ratio, but the separation of the detected planet is ~100 times wider than that of Jupiter. Our results show that planets can reside in much more massive stellar systems than what would be expected from extrapolation of previous results. The planet is unlikely to have formed in-situ through the conventional core accretion mechanism, but might have formed elsewhere and arrived to its present location through dynamical interactions, or might have formed via gravitational instability.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2021

Super stellar abundances of alkali metals suggest significant migration for Hot Jupiters

We investigate the origin of the measured over-abundance of alkali metals in the atmospheres of hot gas giants, relative to both their host stars and their atmospheric water abundances. We show that formation exterior to the water snow line followed by inward disc-driven migration results in excess accretion of oxygen-poor, refractory-rich material from within the snow-line. This naturally leads to enrichment of alkali metals in the planetary atmosphere relative to the bulk composition of its host star but relative abundances of water that are similar to the stellar host. These relative abundances cannot be explained by in situ formation which places the refractory elements in the planetary deep interior rather than the atmosphere. We therefore suggest that the measured compositions of the atmospheres of hot Jupiters are consistent with significant migration for at least a subset of hot gas giants. Our model makes robust predictions about atmospheric composition that can be confirmed with future data from JWST and Ariel.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2021

Planet Formation

Our galaxy is full with planets. We now know that planets and planetary systems are diverse and come with different sizes, masses and compositions, as well as various orbital architectures. Although there has been great progress in understanding planet formation in the last couple of decades, both observationally and theoretically, several fundamental questions remain unsolved. This might not be surprising given the complexity of the process that includes various physical and chemical processes, and spans huge ranges of length-scales, masses, and timescales. In addition, planet formation cannot be directly observed but has to be inferred by gluing together different pieces of information into one consistent picture. "How do planets form?" remains a fundamental question in modern astrophysics. In this review we list some of the key open questions in planet formation theory as well as the challenges and upcoming opportunities.

astro-ph.EP↗