arXiv subjects

Raziuddin Siddiqui

Publications and source records attributed to Raziuddin Siddiqui.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2012

Tangent to Bloch-Suslin and Grassmannian Complexes over the dual numbers

In this article, we extend Siegel's cross-ratio identity for $2\times2$ determinants over the truncated polynomial ring $F[\varepsilon]_ν:=F[\varepsilon]/\varepsilon^ν$. We compute cross-ratios and Goncharov's triple-ratios in $F[\varepsilon]_2$ and $F[\varepsilon]_3$ and use them extensively in our computations for the tangential complexes. We also verify a "projected five-term" relation in the group $T\mathcal{B}_2(F)$ which is crucial to prove one of our central statements that describe the morphisms between tangent complex and Grassmannian complex

math.NT↗

arXiv2012

Configuration complexes and a variant of Cathelineau's complex in weight 3

In this paper we consider the Grassmannian complex of projective configurations in weight 2 and 3, and Cathelineau's infinitesimal polylogarithmic complexes. Our main result is a morphism of complexes between the Grassmannian complex and the associated infinitesimal polylogarithmic complex. In order to establish this connection we introduce an $F$-vector space $β^D_2(F)$, which is an intermediate structure between a $\varmathbb{Z}$-module $\mathcal{B}_2(F)$ (scissors congruence group for $F$) and Cathelineau's $F$-vector space $β_2(F)$ which is an infinitesimal version of it. The structure of $β^D_2(F)$ is also infinitesimal but it has the advantage of satisfying similar functional equations as the group $\mathcal{B}_2(F)$. We put this in a complex to form a variant of Cathelineau's infinitesimal complex for weight 2.

math.NT↗

arXiv2012

Morphisms Between Classical and Infinitesimal Polylogarithmic and Grassmannian Complexes

In this paper we want to introduce two commutative diagrams for weight $n$=2 and $n$=3 with six faces on each. These diagrams describe the relations between Grassmannian complex in geometric configurations, Bloch-Suslin's complex for weight $n$=2 and Goncharov's complex for weight $n$=3 and the variants of Cathelineau's complexes for weight $n$=2,3. Here we are putting all complexes together to see a bigger picture.

math.NT↗