Razvan Stanescu | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Error-Generator-Level Compression for Fast Quantum Gates

Fast quantum gates in multilevel systems require suppressing many coherent-error channels using pulses that remain simple to implement. We introduce error-generator-level compression, a Magnus-based control principle that minimizes the complete projected error generator at a chosen perturbative order while restricting the implemented waveform to a few independently adjustable coefficients. This construction preserves all modeled computational and leakage errors rather than truncating the pulse by error channel, while its generator-level objective directly penalizes residual eigenphases that can signal departure from the perturbative regime. For fast transmon gates, a three-parameter pulse suppresses errors by orders of magnitude, outperforms grid-optimized leading- order DRAG over the gate-time range studied, and approaches a fully parameterized 17-parameter Magnus correction. The compressed pulse is also substantially less sensitive to the illustrative finite-bandwidth filtering model considered here.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Effective Hamiltonians for Predictive Quantum Control

High-fidelity quantum control relies on accurate models of driven dynamics. We examine this re- quirement for single-qubit gates in superconducting transmons by comparing control pulses derived from the standard Duffing approximation and from a Hamiltonian constructed by diagonalizing the transmon eigenbasis. Using the same correction-pulse construction for both models, we show that correction fields derived from the Duffing approximation can substantially reduce the gate error pre- dicted by that model while remaining less effective when combined with an independently calibrated baseline pulse in the diagonalized-transmon model. In the fast-gate regime, such transferred correc- tions can even fail to improve over the uncorrected diagonalized-transmon baseline. We show that small model-dependent differences in both the energy spectrum and the representation of the drive operator can compound during driven evolution, resulting in different predicted error generators and correction pulses. A mismatch in the accumulated AC Stark phase provides one illustrative di- agnostic of this dynamical model dependence. We further demonstrate that the model Hamiltonian informs the choice of control framework: Omitting relevant leakage pathways or higher-order error channels can lead to an overly restricted correction strategy. Including these channels motivates an extended correction framework that improves the gate performance using the same physical control resources.

quant-ph↗