arXiv subjects

Rebecca Owens

Publications and source records attributed to Rebecca Owens.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Credible, Not Always Correct: How Reddit Users Verify AI-Generated Legal Advice

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by laypeople to resolve real legal problems, against a backdrop of persistent access-to-justice deficits. This article presents evidence that the practical force of AI-generated legal advice depends not on its accuracy but on the social production of its credibility. While existing research has assessed the accuracy of legal AI, less is known about how machine-generated guidance is verified and made credible enough for lay users to act on. Drawing on a dual-method analysis of 153 Reddit narratives and 5,341 community reactions, this article maps a spectrum of verification practices. At one end, a minority of users verify AI-generated legal advice by triangulating across models, and some submit AI-generated guidance to platform communities for evaluation before acting, a configuration we term distributed counsel. Far more commonly, however, narratives are silent on verification. AI-generated legal advice is acted on the strength of its lawyer-like form and emotional reassurance alone. These findings show that AI-assisted legal self-help operates within an emerging informal infrastructure which redistributes the work of verification to those least equipped to bear it.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Online Safety Regulation Increases Attention to VPNs: Privacy Implications of the UK Online Safety Act

Governments worldwide are increasingly regulating digital platforms to reduce online harms, but access restrictions can alter user behaviour and create new privacy risks. The UK Online Safety Act, passed in 2023, rolled out in phases - illegal-content enforcement in March 2025 and mandatory age verification in July 2025. We analyse Reddit discourse across VPN and UK Politics communities and conduct a privacy-policy risk analysis of 69 VPN services. We find that the behavioural response is concentrated at the July 2025 deadline, when platforms hosting pornographic content were required to deploy age checks. UK VPN search interest on Google increased by 147% at this deadline. UK-resident users' VPN-subreddit activity increased by 145%. Their regulatory- or privacy-related VPN posts and comments rose by 1,265% at this deadline. UK Politics communities show the same concentration at a larger magnitude, with OSA-related political discourse rising by 1481%. These effects were far smaller or statistically indistinguishable from pre-existing trends at Royal Assent and the illegal-harms enforcement deadline, indicating that the deployed age checks drove the response. Users primarily frame this response around privacy, surveillance, and distrust of age-verification intermediaries rather than access-seeking, with near-zero genuine pro-OSA sentiment across two independent classifiers. Several users noted that those least able to pay for reputable VPNs are most likely to turn to free services that monetise their data. Search attention increases across all disclosed privacy-risk categories, with no evidence of a shift toward higher-risk VPN providers. Crucially, after a full year, this attention is still elevated, arguing against a temporary news-cycle reaction. Thus, online safety regulation may create secondary privacy costs without disproportionately directing attention toward higher-risk VPNs.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

ChatGPT vs Teachers vs Students: Large-Scale Analysis of Generative AI Discourse in Education Communities on Reddit

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has prompted significant discussion in education, yet large-scale empirical evidence on how students and teachers perceive and navigate this shift remains limited. We analyse 270k AI-related Reddit posts and comments from 26 education-related subreddits spanning higher education, K-12 teaching, and professional training between November 2022 and April 2026. Topic modelling reveals seventeen themes covering academic integrity, teaching & pedagogy, career anxiety, policy, and niche professional contexts. Discourse evolves from an early detection-and-evasion arms race into a sustained enforcement regime that constructive integration only begins to challenge in mid-2024. Stakeholder communities differ sharply: K-12 teachers foreground cognitive dependency, academics focus on AI detection and deliberation, and professional-programme students concentrate on career anxiety. Sentiment correlates strongly negatively with engagement, showing adversarial enforcement themes mobilise communities far more than constructive integration discourse. Examining where faculty and students meet, we find 17% of threads are cross-role, and one third of such contact occurs in the adversarial themes AI Detection and Misconduct Enforcement. Students initiate 68% of mixed threads, but faculty produce most cross-role replies. Mixed threads contain 2-3 times more records and last 2-4 times longer than same-role threads, making adversarial integrity disputes the center of sustained faculty-student contact. We discuss implications for governance, pedagogical design, and cross-role contact design. The code and data is available at https://github.com/tugrulz/genai-edu

cs.CY↗