arXiv subjects

Rebeka Toth

Publications and source records attributed to Rebeka Toth.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

The Phish, The Spam, and The Valid: Generating Feature-Rich Emails for Benchmarking LLMs

In this paper, we introduce a metadata-enriched generation framework (PhishFuzzer) that seeds real emails into Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce 23,100 diverse, structurally consistent email variants across controlled entity and length dimensions. Unlike prior corpora, our dataset features strict three-class labels (Phishing, Spam, Valid), provides full URL and attachment metadata, and annotates each email with attacker intent. Using this dataset, we benchmark two state-of-the-art LLMs (Qwen-2.5-72B and Gemini-3.1-Pro) under both Basic (body, subject) and Full (+URL, sender, attachment) settings. By applying formal confidence metrics (Task Success Rate and Confidence Index), we analyze model reliability, robustness against linguistic fuzzing, and the impact of structural metadata on detection accuracy. Our fully open-source framework and dataset provide a rigorous foundation for evaluating next-generation email security systems. To support open science, we make the PhishFuzzer Dataset, the generation scripts and prompts available on GitHub: https://github.com/DataPhish/PhishFuzzer

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Sustaining Cyber Awareness: The Long-Term Impact of Continuous Phishing Training and Emotional Triggers

Phishing constitutes more than 90\% of successful cyberattacks globally, remaining one of the most persistent threats to organizational security. Despite organizations tripling their cybersecurity budgets between 2015 and 2025, the human factor continues to pose a critical vulnerability. This study presents a 12-month longitudinal investigation examining how continuous cybersecurity training and emotional cues affect employee susceptibility to phishing. The experiment involved 20 organizations and over 1,300 employees who collectively received more than 13,000 simulated phishing emails engineered with diverse emotional, contextual, and structural characteristics. Behavioral responses were analyzed using non-parametric correlation and regression models to assess the influence of psychological manipulation, message personalization, and perceived email source. Results demonstrate that sustained phishing simulations and targeted training programs lead to a significant reduction in employee susceptibility, halving successful compromise rates within six months. Additionally, employee turnover introduces measurable fluctuations in awareness levels, underscoring the necessity of maintaining continuous training initiatives. These findings provide one of the few long-term perspectives on phishing awareness efficacy, highlighting the strategic importance of ongoing behavioral interventions in strengthening organizational cyber resilience. In order to support open science, we published our email templates, source code, and other materials at https://github.com/CorporatePhishingStudy

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

Dynamic Intelligence Assessment: Benchmarking LLMs on the Road to AGI with a Focus on Model Confidence

As machine intelligence evolves, the need to test and compare the problem-solving abilities of different AI models grows. However, current benchmarks are often simplistic, allowing models to perform uniformly well and making it difficult to distinguish their capabilities. Additionally, benchmarks typically rely on static question-answer pairs that the models might memorize or guess. To address these limitations, we introduce Dynamic Intelligence Assessment (DIA), a novel methodology for testing AI models using dynamic question templates and improved metrics across multiple disciplines such as mathematics, cryptography, cybersecurity, and computer science. The accompanying dataset, DIA-Bench, contains a diverse collection of challenge templates with mutable parameters presented in various formats, including text, PDFs, compiled binaries, visual puzzles, and CTF-style cybersecurity challenges. Our framework introduces four new metrics to assess a model's reliability and confidence across multiple attempts. These metrics revealed that even simple questions are frequently answered incorrectly when posed in varying forms, highlighting significant gaps in models' reliability. Notably, API models like GPT-4o often overestimated their mathematical capabilities, while ChatGPT-4o demonstrated better performance due to effective tool usage. In self-assessment, OpenAI's o1-mini proved to have the best judgement on what tasks it should attempt to solve. We evaluated 25 state-of-the-art LLMs using DIA-Bench, showing that current models struggle with complex tasks and often display unexpectedly low confidence, even with simpler questions. The DIA framework sets a new standard for assessing not only problem-solving but also a model's adaptive intelligence and ability to assess its limitations. The dataset is publicly available on the project's page: https://github.com/DIA-Bench.

cs.AI↗