Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Reinier Diaz Millan

Publications and source records attributed to Reinier Diaz Millan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Projection-Free Algorithm for Variational Inequalities in Hilbert Spaces with Strong Convergence

We study variational inequalities governed by a point-to-set maximal monotone operator in a real Hilbert space and constrained by a convex inequality \(C=\{x\in\Hi:c(x)\le0\}\), where the defining function \(c\) is continuous and not necessarily differentiable. The proposed method uses only projections onto intersections of half-spaces and avoids the metric projection onto \(C\). Feasibility is handled by subgradient cuts and, when a trial operator point is infeasible, by a Slater correction based on a fixed strictly feasible point. The variational inequality is represented by Minty-type separating half-spaces generated at feasible graph points of the operator, and a Haugazeau half-space is added to obtain best-approximation convergence. Under a Slater-corrected feasible-separation condition, together with explicit exact, approximate and finite-candidate oracle realisations, the whole sequence converges strongly to \(P_{S^*}(x^0)\), the projection of the initial point onto the solution set. We also derive best-iterate \(O(N^{-1/2})\) residual estimates for the step residual, feasibility violation and Minty gap. The analysis is stated directly for point-to-set maximal monotone operators, while the concrete oracle realisations include finite-dimensional single-valued models. We record the consequences of strong monotonicity in the point-to-set setting and provide numerical comparisons on nonsmooth and large-scale constraints, including maxima of convex quadratics, a discretised optimal-control problem, mixed-norm sparse recovery, a Cournot--Nash capacity equilibrium, and a genuine point-to-set \(\ell_1\)-subdifferential example.

math.OC↗

A comparison of rational and neural network based approximations

Rational and neural network based approximations are efficient tools in modern approximation. These approaches are able to produce accurate approximations to nonsmooth and non-Lipschitz functions, including multivariate domain functions. In this paper we compare the efficiency of function approximation using rational approximation, neural network and their combinations. It was found that rational approximation is superior to neural network based approaches with the same number of decision variables. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the efficiency of rational approximation, even when the number of approximation parameters (that is, the dimension of the corresponding optimisation problems) is small. Another important contribution of this paper lies in the improvement of rational approximation algorithms. Namely, the optimisation based algorithms for rational approximation can be adjusted to in such a way that the conditioning number of the constraint matrices are controlled. This simple adjustment enables us to work with high dimension optimisation problems and improve the design of the neural network. The main strength of neural networks is in their ability to handle models with a large number of variables: complex models are decomposed in several simple optimisation problems. Therefore the the large number of decision variables is in the nature of neural networks.

math.OC↗