arXiv subjects

Renato D. C. Monteiro

Publications and source records attributed to Renato D. C. Monteiro.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2021

FISTA and Extensions -- Review and New Insights

The purpose of this technical report is to review the main properties of an accelerated composite gradient (ACG) method commonly referred to as the Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm (FISTA). In addition, we state a version of FISTA for solving both convex and strongly convex composite minimization problems and derive its iteration complexities to generate iterates satisfying various stopping criteria, including one which arises in the course of solving other composite optimization problems via inexact proximal point schemes. This report also discusses different reformulations of the convex version of FISTA and how they relate to other formulations in the literature.

math.OC↗

arXiv2021

An accelerated inexact proximal point method for solving nonconvex-concave min-max problems

This paper presents smoothing schemes for obtaining approximate stationary points of unconstrained or linearly-constrained composite nonconvex-concave min-max (and hence nonsmooth) problems by applying well-known algorithms to composite smooth approximations of the original problems. More specifically, in the unconstrained (resp. constrained) case, approximate stationary points of the original problem are obtained by applying, to its composite smooth approximation, an accelerated inexact proximal point (resp. quadratic penalty) method presented in a previous paper by the authors. Iteration complexity bounds for both smoothing schemes are also established. Finally, numerical results are given to demonstrate the efficiency of the unconstrained smoothing scheme.

math.OC↗

arXiv2021

A proximal bundle variant with optimal iteration-complexity for a large range of prox stepsizes

This paper presents a proximal bundle variant, namely, the relaxed proximal bundle (RPB) method, for solving convex nonsmooth composite optimization problems. Like other proximal bundle variants, RPB solves a sequence of prox bundle subproblems whose objective functions are regularized composite cutting-plane models. Moreover, RPB uses a novel condition to decide whether to perform a serious or null iteration which does not necessarily yield a function value decrease. Optimal iteration-complexity bounds for RPB are established for a large range of prox stepsizes, both in the convex and strongly convex settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a proximal bundle variant is shown to be optimal for a large range of prox stepsizes. Finally, iteration-complexity results for RPB to obtain iterates satisfying practical termination criteria, rather than near optimal solutions, are also derived.

math.OC↗

arXiv2021

A FISTA-type accelerated gradient algorithm for solving smooth nonconvex composite optimization problems

In this paper, we describe and establish iteration-complexity of two accelerated composite gradient (ACG) variants to solve a smooth nonconvex composite optimization problem whose objective function is the sum of a nonconvex differentiable function $ f $ with a Lipschitz continuous gradient and a simple nonsmooth closed convex function $ h $. When $f$ is convex, the first ACG variant reduces to the well-known FISTA for a specific choice of the input, and hence the first one can be viewed as a natural extension of the latter one to the nonconvex setting. The first variant requires an input pair $(M,m)$ such that $f$ is $m$-weakly convex, $\nabla f$ is $M$-Lipschitz continuous, and $m \le M$ (possibly $m<M$), which is usually hard to obtain or poorly estimated. The second variant on the other hand can start from an arbitrary input pair $(M,m)$ of positive scalars and its complexity is shown to be not worse, and better in some cases, than that of the first variant for a large range of the input pairs. Finally, numerical results are provided to illustrate the efficiency of the two ACG variants.

math.OC↗

arXiv2020

An Average Curvature Accelerated Composite Gradient Method for Nonconvex Smooth Composite Optimization Problems

This paper presents an accelerated composite gradient (ACG) variant, referred to as the AC-ACG method, for solving nonconvex smooth composite minimization problems. As opposed to well-known ACG variants that are either based on a known Lipschitz gradient constant or a sequence of maximum observed curvatures, the current one is based on the average of all past observed curvatures. More specifically, AC-ACG uses a positive multiple of the average of all observed curvatures until the previous iteration as a way to estimate the "function curvature" at the current point and then two resolvent evaluations to compute the next iterate. In contrast to other variable Lipschitz estimation variants, e.g., the ones based on the maximum curvature, AC-ACG always accepts the aforementioned iterate regardless how poor the Lipschitz estimation turns out to be. Finally, computational results are presented to illustrate the efficiency of AC-ACG on both randomly generated and real-world problem instances.

math.OC↗

arXiv2020

Iteration-complexity of an inexact proximal accelerated augmented Lagrangian method for solving linearly constrained smooth nonconvex composite optimization problems

This paper proposes and establishes the iteration-complexity of an inexact proximal accelerated augmented Lagrangian (IPAAL) method for solving linearly constrained smooth nonconvex composite optimization problems. Each IPAAL iteration consists of inexactly solving a proximal augmented Lagrangian subproblem by an accelerated composite gradient (ACG) method followed by a suitable Lagrange multiplier update. It is shown that IPAAL generates an approximate stationary solution in at most ${\cal O}(\log(1/ρ)/ρ^{3})$ ACG iterations, where $ρ>0$ is the given tolerance. It is also shown that the previous complexity bound can be sharpened to ${\cal O}(\log(1/ρ)/ρ^{2.5})$ under additional mildly stronger assumptions. The above bounds are derived assuming that the initial point is neither feasible nor the domain of the composite term of the objective function is bounded. Some preliminary numerical results are presented to illustrate the performance of the IPAAL method.

math.OC↗

arXiv2019

An efficient adaptive accelerated inexact proximal point method for solving linearly constrained nonconvex composite problems

This paper proposes an efficient adaptive variant of a quadratic penalty accelerated inexact proximal point (QP-AIPP) method proposed earlier by the authors. Both the QP-AIPP method and its variant solve linearly set constrained nonconvex composite optimization problems using a quadratic penalty approach where the generated penalized subproblems are solved by a variant of the underlying AIPP method. The variant, in turn, solves a given penalized subproblem by generating a sequence of proximal subproblems which are then solved by an accelerated composite gradient algorithm. The main difference between AIPP and its variant is that the proximal subproblems in the former are always convex while the ones in the latter are not necessarily convex due to the fact that their prox parameters are chosen as aggressively as possible so as to improve efficiency. The possibly nonconvex proximal subproblems generated by the AIPP variant are also tentatively solved by a novel adaptive accelerated composite gradient algorithm based on the validity of some key convergence inequalities. As a result, the variant generates a sequence of proximal subproblems where the stepsizes are adaptively changed according to the responses obtained from the calls to the accelerated composite gradient algorithm. Finally, numerical results are given to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed AIPP and QP-AIPP variants.

math.OC↗

arXiv2019

Complexity of a quadratic penalty accelerated inexact proximal point method for solving linearly constrained nonconvex composite programs

This paper analyzes the iteration-complexity of a quadratic penalty accelerated inexact proximal point method for solving linearly constrained nonconvex composite programs. More specifically, the objective function is of the form $f + h$ where $f$ is a differentiable function whose gradient is Lipschitz continuous and $h$ is a closed convex function with bounded domain. The method, basically, consists of applying an accelerated inexact proximal point method for solving approximately a sequence of quadratic penalized subproblems associated to the linearly constrained problem. Each subproblem of the proximal point method is in turn approximately solved by an accelerated composite gradient (ACG) method. It is shown that the proposed scheme generates a $ρ$-approximate stationary point in at most ${\cal{O}}(ρ^{-3})$ ACG iterations. Finally, numerical results showing the efficiency of the proposed method are also given.

math.OC↗

arXiv2018

A Doubly Accelerated Inexact Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Composite Optimization Problems

This paper describes and establishes the iteration-complexity of a doubly accelerated inexact proximal point (D-AIPP) method for solving the nonconvex composite minimization problem whose objective function is of the form $f+h$ where $f$ is a (possibly nonconvex) differentiable function whose gradient is Lipschitz continuous and $h$ is a closed convex function with bounded domain. D-AIPP performs two types of iterations, namely, inner and outer ones. Its outer iterations correspond to the ones of the accelerated inexact proximal point scheme. Its inner iterations are the ones performed by an accelerated composite gradient method for inexactly solving the convex proximal subproblems generated during the outer iterations. Thus, D-AIPP employs both inner and outer accelerations.

math.OC↗

arXiv2017

Complexity of the relaxed Peaceman-Rachford splitting method for the sum of two maximal strongly monotone operators

This paper considers the relaxed Peaceman-Rachford (PR) splitting method for finding an approximate solution of a monotone inclusion whose underlying operator consists of the sum of two maximal strongly monotone operators. Using general results obtained in the setting of a non-Euclidean hybrid proximal extragradient framework, we extend a previous convergence result on the iterates generated by the relaxed PR splitting method, as well as establish new pointwise and ergodic convergence rate results for the method whenever an associated relaxation parameter is within a certain interval. An example is also discussed to demonstrate that the iterates may not converge when the relaxation parameter is outside this interval.

math.OC↗

arXiv2017

Convergence rate bounds for a proximal ADMM with over-relaxation stepsize parameter for solving nonconvex linearly constrained problems

This paper establishes convergence rate bounds for a variant of the proximal alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for solving nonconvex linearly constrained optimization problems. The variant of the proximal ADMM allows the inclusion of an over-relaxation stepsize parameter belonging to the interval $(0,2)$. To the best of our knowledge, all related papers in the literature only consider the case where the over-relaxation parameter lies in the interval $(0,(1+\sqrt{5})/2)$.

math.OC↗

arXiv2017

Iteration-complexity of a Jacobi-type non-Euclidean ADMM for multi-block linearly constrained nonconvex programs

This paper establishes the iteration-complexity of a Jacobi-type non-Euclidean proximal alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for solving multi-block linearly constrained nonconvex programs. The subproblems of this ADMM variant can be solved in parallel and hence the method has great potential to solve large scale multi-block linearly constrained nonconvex programs. Moreover, our analysis allows the Lagrange multiplier to be updated with a relaxation parameter in the interval (0, 2).

math.OC↗

arXiv2017

Improved pointwise iteration-complexity of a regularized ADMM and of a regularized non-Euclidean HPE framework

This paper describes a regularized variant of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for solving linearly constrained convex programs. It is shown that the pointwise iteration-complexity of the new method is better than the corresponding one for the standard ADMM method and that, up to a logarithmic term, is identical to the ergodic iteration-complexity of the latter method. Our analysis is based on first presenting and establishing the pointwise iteration-complexity of a regularized non-Euclidean hybrid proximal extragradient framework whose error condition at each iteration includes both a relative error and a summable error. It is then shown that the new method is a special instance of the latter framework where the sequence of summable errors is identically zero when the ADMM stepsize is less than one or a nontrivial sequence when the stepsize is in the interval [1, (1 +\sqrt{5})/2).

math.OC↗

arXiv2016

Extending the ergodic convergence rate of the proximal ADMM

Pointwise and ergodic iteration-complexity results for the proximal alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for any stepsize in(0,(1+\sqrt{5})/2) have been recently established in the literature. In addition to giving alternative proofs of these results, this paper also extends the ergodic iteration-complexity result to include the case in which the stepsize is equal to (1+\sqrt{5})/$. As far as we know, this is the first ergodic iteration-complexity for the stepsize (1+\sqrt{5})/2 obtained in the ADMM literature. These results are obtained by showing that the proximal ADMM is an instance of a non-Euclidean hybrid proximal extragradient framework whose pointwise and ergodic convergence rate are also studied.

math.OC↗

arXiv2015

Regularized HPE-type methods for solving monotone inclusions with improved pointwise iteration-complexity bounds

This paper studies the iteration-complexity of new regularized hybrid proximal extragradient (HPE)-type methods for solving monotone inclusion problems (MIPs). The new (regularized HPE-type) methods essentially consist of instances of the standard HPE method applied to regularizations of the original MIP. It is shown that its pointwise iteration-complexity considerably improves the one of the HPE method while approaches (up to a logarithmic factor) the ergodic iteration-complexity of the latter method.

math.OC↗

arXiv2009

Convex Optimization Methods for Dimension Reduction and Coefficient Estimation in Multivariate Linear Regression

In this paper, we study convex optimization methods for computing the trace norm regularized least squares estimate in multivariate linear regression. The so-called factor estimation and selection (FES) method, recently proposed by Yuan et al. [22], conducts parameter estimation and factor selection simultaneously and have been shown to enjoy nice properties in both large and finite samples. To compute the estimates, however, can be very challenging in practice because of the high dimensionality and the trace norm constraint. In this paper, we explore a variant of Nesterov's smooth method [20] and interior point methods for computing the penalized least squares estimate. The performance of these methods is then compared using a set of randomly generated instances. We show that the variant of Nesterov's smooth method [20] generally outperforms the interior point method implemented in SDPT3 version 4.0 (beta) [19] substantially . Moreover, the former method is much more memory efficient.

stat.ME↗