arXiv subjects

Rhiannon K Owen

Publications and source records attributed to Rhiannon K Owen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes with non-proportional hazards: a Bayesian time-varying hazard ratio approach

Background: Often when undertaking meta-analyses of time-to-event (TTE) outcomes, especially in a Health Technology Assessment context, a hazard ratio (HR) scale is used. However, issues arise when there is evidence of non-proportional hazards in some of the studies included. A number of methods have been advocated, but their use has been limited by either their complexity and/or the ease with which their results can be used in HTA. An alternative approach is to assume a treatment-log(time) interaction within a Cox proportional hazards model for each study, and to then undertake a bivariate meta-analysis of the resulting treatment and interaction coefficients, so that an overall time-varying HR (TVHR) can be obtained. Methods: A TVHR approach was applied to a meta-analysis of chemotherapy compared to Standard of Care for advanced recurrent gastric cancer, and in which Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was an outcome. The approach was also applied to a network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluating overall survival (OS) in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. Results: Five trials in the advanced gastric cancer meta-analysis displayed evidence of non-proportional hazards for PFS. Using a TVHR model produced HRs ranging from 0.83 (CrI:0.75-0.91) at 0.5 years to 0.99 (CrI:0.79-1.23) at 3.5 years. Three studies showed evidence of non-proportional hazards in the advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma NMA for OS. Using a TVHR model, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated consistent superiority from month 7 onwards, with a HR improving from 0.37 (CrI:0.26-0.51) at one year to 0.24 (CrI:0.12-0.45) at five years. Conclusions: A TVHR approach to the meta-analysis or NMA of TTE outcomes when the proportional hazards assumption appears not to hold, produces an intuitive solution which can be readily used in HTA.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Bayesian Profile Regression using Variational Inference to Identify Clusters of Multiple Long-Term Conditions Conditioning on Mortality in Population-Scale Data

Multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) are increasingly observed in clinical practice globally. Clustering methods to group diseases into commonly co-occurring clusters have been of interest for further understanding of how MLTC group together and their associated impact on patient outcomes. However, such approaches require large, often population-scale datasets. Bayesian Profile Regression (BPR) is a statistical model that combines a Dirichlet Process Mixture model with a hierarchical regression model, in order to form clusters of items conditional on covariates and an outcome of interest. We developed a BPR model using full-rank Stochastic Variational Inference (SVI) for application in large-scale data. We assessed it's performance using simulation studies comparing fits using the No-U-turn (NUTS) sampler and full-rank SVI. We then fit a BPR model to find clusters of MLTC in a population-scale data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank. We found results from full-rank SVI compared well with results from NUTS in a simulation study, and the improved fitting performance allowed for fitting models in population-scale datasets. There were 1,296,463 individuals in our electronic health record (EHR) cohort. The clustering model was conditioned on age at cohort entry, socioeconomic deprivation and sex with mortality as the outcome. We used the Elixhauser comorbidity index disease definitions, and found there were 33 disease clusters. We found that clusters featuring metastatic cancer and cardiovascular diseases, such as congestive heart failure, were most strongly associated with the probability of mortality. Our findings show that SVI can be a useful and accurate method for fitting Bayesian models, especially when the dataset size would make Monte Carlo methods prohibitively time consuming or impossible.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2025

Evaluating amyloid-beta as a surrogate endpoint in trials of anti-amyloid drugs in Alzheimer's disease: a Bayesian meta-analysis

The use of amyloid-beta (A$β$) clearance to support regulatory approvals of drugs in Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains controversial. We evaluate A$β$ as a potential trial-level surrogate endpoint for clinical function in AD using a meta-analysis. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the effectiveness of anti- A$β$ monoclonal antibodies (MABs) on A$β$ and clinical outcomes were identified through a literature review. A Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis was used to evaluate surrogate relationships between the treatment effects on A$β$ and clinical function, with the intercept, slope and variance quantifying the trial level association. The analysis was performed using RCT data both collectively across all MABs and separately for each MAB through subgroup analysis. The latter analysis was extended by applying Bayesian hierarchical models to borrow information across treatments. We identified 23 RCTs with 39 treatment contrasts for seven MABs. The association between treatment effects on A$β$ and Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) across all MABs was strong: with intercept of -0.03 (95% credible intervals: -0.16, 0.11), slope of 1.41 (0.60, 2.21) and variance of 0.02 (0.00, 0.05). For individual treatments, the surrogate relationships were suboptimal, displaying large uncertainty. The use of hierarchical models considerably reduced the uncertainty around key parameters, narrowing the intervals for the slopes by an average of 71% (range: 51%-95%) and for the variances by 28% (7%-65%). Our results suggest that A$β$ is a potential surrogate endpoint for CDR-SOB when assuming a common surrogate relationship across all MABs. When allowing for information-sharing, the surrogate relationships improved, but only for lecanemab and aducanumab was the improvement sufficient to support a surrogate relationship.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2023

Individual participant data from digital sources informed and improved precision in the evaluation of predictive biomarkers in Bayesian network meta-analysis

Objective: We aimed to develop a meta-analytic model for evaluation of predictive biomarkers and targeted therapies, utilising data from digital sources when individual participant data (IPD) from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are unavailable. Methods: A Bayesian network meta-regression model, combining aggregate data (AD) from RCTs and IPD, was developed for modelling time-to-event data to evaluate predictive biomarkers. IPD were sourced from electronic health records, using target trial emulation approach, or digitised Kaplan-Meier curves. The model is illustrated using two examples; breast cancer with a hormone receptor biomarker, and metastatic colorectal cancer with the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) biomarker. Results: The model developed allowed for estimation of treatment effects in two subgroups of patients defined by their biomarker status. Effectiveness of taxane did not differ in hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer patients. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy in KRAS wild type colorectal cancer patients but not in patients with KRAS mutant status. Use of IPD reduced uncertainty of the sub-group specific treatment effect estimates by up to 49%. Conclusion: Utilisation of IPD allowed for more detailed evaluation of predictive biomarkers and cancer therapies and improved precision of the estimates compared to use of AD alone.

stat.ME↗