arXiv subjects

Rhiziel P. Manalese

Publications and source records attributed to Rhiziel P. Manalese.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Bibliometric Mapping of AI-Supported Social Presence in Online Learning Environments: Trends, Collaboration, and Thematic Directions

This study examines the development, influence, and collaboration patterns in AI-supported social presence research within online learning environments. Utilizing 59 open-access empirical studies from Scopus, the study applies citation analysis, co-authorship mapping, institutional analysis, and keyword clustering using Python-based bibliometric tools. Findings reveal an upward trend in publications since 2020, with research focusing on engagement, AI tools, instructional design, and ethical issues. While countries such as the United States and Brazil are leading contributors, international collaboration remains limited. Ethical concerns related to trust and fairness are emerging but underexplored. The study highlights the importance of ethical integration, interdisciplinary collaboration, and learner-centered AI applications in education.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Filipino Students' Willingness to Use AI for Mental Health Support: A Path Analysis of Behavioral, Emotional, and Contextual Factors

This study examined how behavioral, emotional, and contextual factors influence Filipino students' willingness to use artificial intelligence (AI) for mental health support. Results showed that habit had the strongest effect on willingness, followed by comfort, emotional benefit, facilitating conditions, and perceived usefulness. Students who used AI tools regularly felt more confident and open to relying on them for emotional support. Empathy, privacy, and accessibility also increased comfort and trust in AI systems. The findings highlight that emotional safety and routine use are essential in promoting willingness. The study recommends AI literacy programs, empathic design, and ethical policies that support responsible and culturally sensitive use of AI for student mental health care.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

AI in Work-Based Learning: Understanding the Purposes and Effects of Intelligent Tools Among Student Interns

This study examined how student interns in Philippine higher education use intelligent tools during their OJT. Data were collected from 384 respondents using a structured questionnaire that asked about AI tool usage, task-specific applications, and perceptions of confidence, ethics, and support. Analysis of task-based usage identified four main purposes: productivity and report writing, communication and content drafting, technical assistance and code support, and independent task completion. ChatGPT was the most commonly used AI tool, followed by Quillbot, Canva AI, and Grammarly. Students reported moderate confidence in using AI and applied these tools selectively and ethically during OJT tasks. This indicate that AI tools assist student interns in various OJT activities related to work-readiness. The study suggests that higher education programs include AI literacy and onboarding. Clear policies and fair access to AI tools are important to support responsible use and prepare students for future careers.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Plagiarism or Productivity? Students Moral Disengagement and Behavioral Intentions to Use ChatGPT in Academic Writing

This study examined how moral disengagement influences Filipino college students' intention to use ChatGPT in academic writing. The model tested five mechanisms: moral justification, euphemistic labeling, displacement of responsibility, minimizing consequences, and attribution of blame. These mechanisms were analyzed as predictors of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, which then predicted behavioral intention. A total of 418 students with ChatGPT experience participated. The results showed that several moral disengagement mechanisms influenced students' attitudes and sense of control. Among the predictors, attribution of blame had the strongest influence, while attitudes had the highest impact on behavioral intention. The model explained more than half of the variation in intention. These results suggest that students often rely on institutional gaps and peer behavior to justify AI use. Many believe it is acceptable to use ChatGPT for learning or when rules are unclear. This shows a need for clear academic integrity policies, ethical guidance, and classroom support. The study also recognizes that intention-based models may not fully explain student behavior. Emotional factors, peer influence, and convenience can also affect decisions. The results provide useful insights for schools that aim to support responsible and informed AI use in higher education.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Dependency on Meta AI Chatbot in Messenger Among STEM and Non-STEM Students in Higher Education

To understand the potential dependency of tertiary students regarding Meta AI in the academic context. This descriptive cross-sectional study surveyed 872 tertiary students from public and private institutions in Luzon, Philippines. Demographic information and perceptions on Meta AI dependency based on existing literature were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and differences between STEM and non-STEM students were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The results indicate a nuanced perspective on Meta AI chatbot use among students. While there is general disagreement with heavy reliance on the chatbot for academic tasks, psychological support, and social factors, there is moderate agreement on its technological benefits and academic utility. Students value the Meta AI convenience, availability, and problem-solving assistance, but prefer traditional resources and human interaction for academic and social support. Concerns about dependency risks and impacts on critical thinking are acknowledged, particularly among STEM students, who rely more on chatbots for academic purposes. This suggests that while Meta AI is a valuable resource, its role is complementary rather than transformative in educational contexts, with institutional encouragement and individual preferences influencing usage patterns. Students generally hesitate to rely heavily on meta-AI chatbots. This reflects a preference for traditional resources and independent problem-solving. While students acknowledge AI chatbots academic benefits and technological convenience, concerns about overreliance and its impact on critical thinking persist, particularly among STEM students, who appear more inclined to integrate these tools into their studies.

cs.CY↗