arXiv subjects

Richard A. Fabes

Publications and source records attributed to Richard A. Fabes.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Me and My Bot: What Users Talk About in AI Companion Communities on Reddit

AI companion communities on platforms such as Reddit are widely characterized as spaces where users discuss their relationships with AI bots. This study examines whether and how that characterization holds, guided by the Synthetic Resonance framework's claim that human-AI relationships can carry genuine relational meaning for the user. Multiple LLMs were employed to code 5,504 Reddit posts from eight AI companion communities for relationship focus, primary topic, and users' emotional valence. Although search terms were weighted toward relational and attachment language, only 45% of posts concerned the user's own relationship with their bot. Posts about users' own bots differed markedly from posts about bots in general in both topic and emotional expression, with 85% of general-bot posts containing no user emotion language compared to 33% of own-bot posts. Among the 970 posts that were relationally focused, companionship and romance each accounted for roughly 46% of discussion, sexual content for 8%, and emotional valence varied across these subtopics. The findings suggest that users engage with these relationships with AI bots as meaningful, and that the discourse about them is broad and emotionally complex.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

The User-In-Context Framework: Understanding Variation in How Users Respond to AI Chatbots

People respond to artificial intelligence chatbots (AICs) in highly variable ways. In this paper, we adapt Bronfenbrenner's theory into a heuristic framework for understanding this variation. The framework places the human user at the center while also placing the AI there and reconceptualizing the proximal processes as the repeated, reciprocal, and coadaptive interactions between the user and a personalized AIC. The surrounding systems identify the contextual factors that shape how the user experiences, interprets, responds to, and is changed by these interactions. Because stateful AICs learn from accumulated exchanges with their users and have memory, users are responding not only to an AIC but also to a version of the AIC that their own prior interactions have helped create. This extension preserves Bronfenbrenner's emphasis on proximal processes while accounting for the unique dynamics of personalized AICs. The resulting framework provides a structured map of where and how variation in human and AIC relationships arises, as well as having implications for researchers, practitioners, and AIC designers.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Synthetic Resonance: A Framework for Growth-Oriented Human-AI Relationships

As human relationships with artificial intelligence systems become increasingly frequent and sustained, existing language and theory fail to accurately capture the nature of these affiliations. Common descriptors such as mutual understanding, connection, or friendship risk anthropomorphizing systems that lack subjective experience, while dominant frameworks tend to reduce AI to either a tool or a threat. In this paper, I introduce the concept of synthetic resonance as an integrative framework for understanding human-AI relationships. Synthetic resonance describes how relationships humans define as meaningful can emerge between a human and an AI system without the need to attribute shared feelings or mutual awareness. I argue that synthetic resonance is best understood as a structured, dynamic pattern of interaction that can produce a sense of relationship without the presence of a second experiencing subject. By clarifying this distinction, the concept of synthetic resonance offers a more precise way of conceptualizing human-AI relationships and highlights their potential value and ethical implications. I also call for more research that tests the processes and outcomes of synthetic resonance.

cs.HC↗