SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Richard C. Gerkin

Publications and source records attributed to Richard C. Gerkin.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Foundation Models for Discovery and Exploration in Chemical Space

Accurate prediction of atomistic, thermodynamic, and kinetic properties from molecular structures underpins materials innovation. Existing computational and experimental approaches lack the scalability required to navigate chemical space efficiently. Scientific foundation models trained on large unlabelled datasets offer a path towards navigating chemical space across application domains. Here, we develop MIST, a family of molecular foundation models with up to an order of magnitude more parameters and data than prior works. Trained using a novel tokenizer, Smirk, which comprehensively captures nuclear, electronic, and geometric information, MIST learns a diverse range of molecules. MIST models have been fine-tuned to predict more than 400 structure-property relationships and have been shown to match or exceed state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks, from physiology to electrochemistry. We demonstrate the ability of these models to solve real-world problems across chemical space from multiobjective electrolyte solvent screening to stereochemical reasoning for organometallics and mixture property prediction. The clearest demonstration of a foundation model is its ability to solve problems that were neither explicit targets of training nor central to the intentions of its developers. We identify olfactory perception mapping as such a problem, and show that MIST accurately predicted scent profiles and learned a hierarchical representation of olfactory space consistent with hyperbolic geometry. We formulated hyperparameter aware Bayesian neural scaling laws which eliminate the need for hyperparameter sweeps at every scale, making training large compute-optimal models feasible on a limited compute budget. The methods and findings presented here represent a significant step towards accelerating materials discovery, design, and optimization using foundation models.

physics.chem-ph

On the role of theory and modeling in neuroscience

In recent years, the field of neuroscience has gone through rapid experimental advances and a significant increase in the use of quantitative and computational methods. This growth has created a need for clearer analyses of the theory and modeling approaches used in the field. This issue is particularly complex in neuroscience because the field studies phenomena across a wide range of scales and often requires consideration of these phenomena at varying degrees of abstraction, from precise biophysical interactions to the computations they implement. We argue that a pragmatic perspective of science, in which descriptive, mechanistic, and normative approaches each play a distinct role in defining and bridging levels of abstraction will facilitate neuroscientific practice. This analysis leads to methodological suggestions, including selecting a level of abstraction that is appropriate for a given problem, identifying transfer functions to connect models and data, and the use of models themselves as a form of experiment.

q-bio.NC

Machine Learning for Scent: Learning Generalizable Perceptual Representations of Small Molecules

Predicting the relationship between a molecule's structure and its odor remains a difficult, decades-old task. This problem, termed quantitative structure-odor relationship (QSOR) modeling, is an important challenge in chemistry, impacting human nutrition, manufacture of synthetic fragrance, the environment, and sensory neuroscience. We propose the use of graph neural networks for QSOR, and show they significantly out-perform prior methods on a novel data set labeled by olfactory experts. Additional analysis shows that the learned embeddings from graph neural networks capture a meaningful odor space representation of the underlying relationship between structure and odor, as demonstrated by strong performance on two challenging transfer learning tasks. Machine learning has already had a large impact on the senses of sight and sound. Based on these early results with graph neural networks for molecular properties, we hope machine learning can eventually do for olfaction what it has already done for vision and hearing.

stat.ML

Unit Testing, Model Validation, and Biological Simulation

The growth of the software industry has gone hand in hand with the development of tools and cultural practices for ensuring the reliability of complex pieces of software. These tools and practices are now acknowledged to be essential to the management of modern software. As computational models and methods have become increasingly common in the biological sciences, it is important to examine how these practices can accelerate biological software development and improve research quality. In this article, we give a focused case study of our experience with the practices of unit testing and test-driven development in OpenWorm, an open-science project aimed at modeling Caenorhabditis elegans. We identify and discuss the challenges of incorporating test-driven development into a heterogeneous, data-driven project, as well as the role of model validation tests, a category of tests unique to software which expresses scientific models.

q-bio.QM

Requirements for storing electrophysiology data

The purpose of this document is to specify the basic data types required for storing electrophysiology and optical imaging data to facilitate computer-based neuroscience studies and data sharing. These requirements are being developed within a working group of the Electrophysiology Task Force in the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF) Program on Standards for Data Sharing. While this document describes the requirements of the standard independent of the actual storage technology, the Task Force has recommended basing a standard on HDF5. This is in line with a number of groups who are already using HDF5 to store electrophysiology data, although currently without being based on a standard.

cs.OH

Humans can discriminate trillions of olfactory stimuli, or more, or fewer

A recent Science paper (Bushdid et al, 2014)[1] proposed that humans can discriminate between at least a trillion olfactory stimuli. Here we show that this claim is the result of a fragile estimation framework capable of producing nearly any result from the reported data, including values tens of orders of magnitude larger or smaller than the one originally reported in [1]. We conclude that there is no evidence for the original claim.

q-bio.NC