SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Richard Hooper

Publications and source records attributed to Richard Hooper.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimal designs for incomplete stepped wedge trials

Background: Stepped wedge trials are longitudinal randomised evaluations, usually cluster-randomised, in which the experimental intervention is introduced in a staggered fashion. Incomplete stepped wedge designs focus the effort of data collection on particular periods in particular sequences. Methods: We suppose there is a cost for every period in every cluster where we collect data, and that there are a fixed number of individuals, m, with data available in each period in each cluster. If we are willing to pay the cost of data collection in that cluster-period then we collect the data on all m individuals, and if we are not willing to pay the cost then we collect no data in that cluster-period. We consider the problem of designing a trial to minimise the total number of cluster-periods of data collection needed to achieve given precision for the treatment effect estimator, or equivalently, to maximise precision for a given number of cluster-periods of data collection. Results: We present the solution for two-period trials, which has two distinct forms, depending on the correlation between two cluster-period means from the same cluster in different periods. We also present a conjecture on the form of the solution for multi-period trials, informed by results from a greedy search of the design space. Conclusions: A real-life stepped wedge design problem will involve trading off the costs of various design elements subject also to constraints on the scale of data collection. Nevertheless, the solutions to the problem considered here add significantly to our understanding of the optimal design of incomplete stepped wedge trials.

stat.AP

Efficient and flexible simulation-based sample size determination for clinical trials with multiple design parameters

Simulation offers a simple and flexible way to estimate the power of a clinical trial when analytic formulae are not available. The computational burden of using simulation has, however, restricted its application to only the simplest of sample size determination problems, minimising a single parameter (the overall sample size) subject to power being above a target level. We describe a general framework for solving simulation-based sample size determination problems with several design parameters over which to optimise and several conflicting criteria to be minimised. The method is based on an established global optimisation algorithm widely used in the design and analysis of computer experiments, using a non-parametric regression model as an approximation of the true underlying power function. The method is flexible, can be used for almost any problem for which power can be estimated using simulation, and can be implemented using existing statistical software packages. We illustrate its application to three increasingly complicated sample size determination problems involving complex clustering structures, co-primary endpoints, and small sample considerations.

stat.ME