SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Riddhi Mishra

Publications and source records attributed to Riddhi Mishra.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Sobolev extensions, interpolation inequalities and consequences

We prove Sobolev interpolation inequalities on extension domains that have a form reminiscent of the corresponding whole-space inequalities. This form is crucial in certain applications, which we discuss as well. The technical key ingredient is the notion of a Lebesgue $W^{1,p}$-extension domain, which we introduce here, and our proof that, for $1<p<\infty$, any $W^{1,p}$-extension domain is a Lebesgue $W^{1,p}$-extension domain.

math.FA

How to recognise extension domains

Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be a bounded domain and $1 < p < \infty$. We prove that there is a bounded extension operator $\dot{W}^{1,p}(\Omega)\to \dot{W}^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ if and only if $\Omega$ satisfies the measure density condition and a Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu type inequality (or limiting formula). As a key ingredient, we establish a fractional Poincar\'e-type inequality under the assumption of Ahlfors regularity alone, improving a result of Ponce (2004). We also prove that, under a mild Hausdorff measure condition on the boundary $\partial \Omega$, fractional extension (from $\dot{W}^{1,p}(\Omega)$ to $\dot{W}^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)$) at a single exponent $s > 1/p$ self-improves to full first-order Sobolev extension (from $\dot{W}^{1,p}(\Omega)$ to $\dot{W}^{1,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)$). These results clarify the role of nonlocal estimates in the geometry of Sobolev extension domains.

math.FA

On Removable Sets for Weighted Sobolev Functions

We give sufficient geometric conditions, not involving capacities, for a compact null set to be removable for the Sobolev functions on weighted $\mathbb R^n$, defined as the closure of smooth functions in the weighted Sobolev norm. Our porosity conditions are in terms of suitable coverings by cubes. The weights are assumed to be doubling and satisfy a Poincaré inequality, which includes, but is not equal to, the famous class of Muckenhoupt weights. Our proofs use ideas and techniques from the theory of analysis on metric spaces.

math.FA

Sobolev Versus Homogeneous Sobolev II

We study the relationship between Sobolev extension domains and homogeneous Sobolev extension domains. Precisely, for a certain range of exponents $p$ and $q$, we construct a $(W^{1, p}, W^{1, q})$-extension domain which is not an $(L^{1, p}, L^{1, q})$-extension domain.

math.FA

Sobolev Versus Homogeneous Sobolev Extension

In this paper, we study the relationship between Sobolev extension domains and homogeneous Sobolev extension domains. Precisely, we obtain the following results. 1- Let $1\leq q\leq p\leq \infty$. Then a bounded $(L^{1, p}, L^{1, q})$-extension domain is also a $(W^{1, p}, W^{1, q})$-extension domain. 2- Let $1\leq q\leq p<q^\star\leq \infty$ or $n< q \leq p\leq \infty$. Then a bounded domain is a $(W^{1, p}, W^{1, q})$-extension domain if and only if it is an $(L^{1, p}, L^{1, q})$-extension domain. 3- For $1\leq q<n$ and $q^\star<p\leq \infty$, there exists a bounded domain $Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ which is a $(W^{1, p}, W^{1, q})$-extension domain but not an $(L^{1, p}, L^{1, q})$-extension domain for $1 \leq q <p\leq n$.

math.FA

On the singular problem involving $g$-Laplacian

In this paper, we show that the existence of a positive weak solution to the equation $(-Δ_g)^s u=f u^{-q(x)}\;\mbox{in}\; Ω,$ where $Ω$ is a smooth bounded domain in $R^N$, $q\in C^1(\overlineΩ)$, and $(-Δ_g)^s$ is the fractional $g$-Laplacian with $g$ is the antiderivative of a Young function and $f$ in suitable Orlicz space subjected to zero Dirichlet condition. This includes the mixed fractional $(p,q)-$Laplacian as a special case. The solution so obtained is also shown to be locally Hölder continuous.

math.AP