Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Rishabh Singh Chauhan

Publications and source records attributed to Rishabh Singh Chauhan.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Estimating Heterogeneity in Travel Mode Choice Shifts with Causal Forests

Objectives: While causal analysis of travel behavior is an emerging field, estimating heterogeneity in mode choice through causal modeling remains unexplored. This study demonstrates the application of a novel causal method, causal forest, to quantify the heterogeneity in travel mode choice shifts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We applied causal forests, a non-parametric causal machine learning method, to 802,935 trip records from the 2017 and 2022 waves of the National Household Travel Survey. The 2017 wave serves as the pre-pandemic control group, while the 2022 wave represents the treatment condition. Within the potential outcomes framework, we estimate average treatment effects (ATE), heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE), and conditional average treatment effects (CATE) across diverse socio-demographic groups and trip characteristics. Findings: Our results reveal an estimated ATE of a 1.86 percentage point (pp) increase in car-mode share, contrasted with decreases of 0.38 pp and 1.57 pp in public transit and walking, respectively. The largest increases in car use appeared for short-distance trips (one mile or less), households with annual incomes exceeding USD 200,000, and female travelers. Novelty: This is one of the first applications of causal forests to travel mode choice, and the first to use causal machine learning to estimate the pandemic's causal effect on mode choice analysis. Practical Applications: This study discusses methodological advantages, inherent assumptions, and limitations of causal forests within the context of transportation planning. This methodology is applied to COVID-19 travel data to illustrate how causal heterogeneity analysis can offer a deeper understanding of changes in mode choice. These insights are valuable for planners and policymakers in making policies related to mode shifts under an intervention.

stat.AP↗

Causation versus Prediction: Comparing Causal Discovery and Inference with Artificial Neural Networks in Travel Mode Choice Modeling

This study compares the performance of a causal and a predictive model in modeling travel mode choice in three neighborhoods in Chicago. A causal discovery algorithm and a causal inference technique were used to extract the causal relationships in the mode choice decision making process and to estimate the quantitative causal effects between the variables both directly from observational data. The model results reveal that trip distance and vehicle ownership are the direct causes of mode choice in the three neighborhoods. Artificial neural network models were estimated to predict mode choice. Their accuracy was over 70%, and the SHAP values obtained measure the importance of each variable. We find that both the causal and predictive modeling approaches are useful for the purpose they serve. We also note that the study of mode choice behavior through causal modeling is mostly unexplored, yet it could transform our understanding of the mode choice behavior. Further research is needed to realize the full potential of these techniques in modeling mode choice.

stat.ME↗

Determining Causality in Travel Mode Choice

This article presents one of the pioneering studies on causal modeling in travel mode choice decision-making using causal discovery algorithms. These models are a major advancement from conventional correlation-based techniques. We propose a novel methodology that combines causal discovery with structural equation modeling (SEM). This modeling approach overcomes some of the limitations of SEM by combining the strengths of both causal discovery and SEM. Causal discovery algorithms determine causal graphs from observational data and domain knowledge, and SEMs estimate direct causal effects and test the performance of causal discovery algorithms. In this study, we test four causal discovery algorithms: Peter-Clark (PC), Fast Causal Inference (FCI), Fast Greedy Equivalence Search (FGES), and Direct Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Models (DirectLiNGAM). The results show that DirectLiNGAM based SEM model best captures causality in mode choice behavior. It passes several goodness-of-fit tests, including Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI), and it achieves the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) value. The analyses are conducted on data collected from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey in the New York Metropolitan area.

stat.AP↗

The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future of Telecommuting in the United States

This study focuses on an important transport-related long-term effect of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: an increase in telecommuting. Analyzing a nationally representative panel survey of adults, we find that 40-50% of workers expect to telecommute at least a few times per month post-pandemic, up from 24% pre-COVID. If given the option, 90-95% of those who first telecommuted during the pandemic plan to continue the practice regularly. We also find that new telecommuters are demographically similar to pre-COVID telecommuters. Both pre- and post-COVID, higher educational attainment and income, together with certain job categories, largely determine whether workers have the option to telecommute. Despite growth in telecommuting, approximately half of workers expect to remain unable to telecommute and between 2/3 and 3/4 of workers expect their post-pandemic telecommuting patterns to be unchanged from their pre-COVID patterns. This limits the contribution telecommuting can make to reducing peak hour transport demand.

physics.soc-ph↗

COVID Future Panel Survey: A Unique Public Dataset Documenting How U.S. Residents' Travel Related Choices Changed During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented global crisis that has impacted virtually everyone. We conducted a nationwide online longitudinal survey in the United States to collect information about the shifts in travel-related behavior and attitudes before, during, and after the pandemic. The survey asked questions about commuting, long distance travel, working from home, online learning, online shopping, pandemic experiences, attitudes, and demographic information. The survey has been deployed to the same respondents thrice to observe how the responses to the pandemic have evolved over time. The first wave of the survey was conducted from April 2020 to June 2021, the second wave from November 2020 to August 2021, and the third wave from October 2021 to November 2021. In total, 9,265 responses were collected in the first wave; of these, 2,877 respondents returned for the second wave and 2,728 for the third wave. Survey data are publicly available. This unique dataset can aid policy makers in making decisions in areas including transport, workforce development, and more. This article demonstrates the framework for conducting this online longitudinal survey. It details the step-by-step procedure involved in conducting the survey and in curating the data to make it representative of the national trends.

cs.CY↗

A database of travel-related behaviors and attitudes before, during, and after COVID-19 in the United States

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted billions of people around the world. To capture some of these impacts in the United States, we are conducting a nationwide longitudinal survey collecting information about activity and travel-related behaviors and attitudes before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey questions cover a wide range of topics including commuting, daily travel, air travel, working from home, online learning, shopping, and risk perception, along with attitudinal, socioeconomic, and demographic information. The survey is deployed over multiple waves to the same respondents to monitor how behaviors and attitudes evolve over time. Version 1.0 of the survey contains 8,723 Wave 1 responses that are publicly available. This article details the methodology adopted for the collection, cleaning, and processing of the data. In addition, the data are weighted to be representative of national and regional demographics. This survey dataset can aid researchers, policymakers, businesses, and government agencies in understanding both the extent of behavioral shifts and the likelihood that changes in behaviors will persist after COVID-19.

stat.AP↗

The Enduring Effects of COVID-19 on Travel Behavior in the United States: A Panel Study on Observed and Expected Changes in Telecommuting, Mode Choice, Online Shopping and Air Travel

The explosive nature of Covid-19 transmission drastically altered the rhythm of daily life by forcing billions of people to stay at their homes. A critical challenge facing transportation planners is to identify the type and the extent of changes in people's activity-travel behavior in the post-pandemic world. In this study, we investigated the travel behavior evolution by analyzing a longitudinal two-wave panel survey data conducted in the United States from April 2020 to October 2020 (wave 1) and from November 2020 to May 2021(wave 2). Encompassing nearly 3,000 respondents across different states, we explored pandemic-induced changes and underlying reasons in four major categories of telecommute/telemedicine, commute mode choice, online shopping, and air travel. Upon concrete evidence, our findings substantiate significantly observed and expected changes in habits and preferences. According to results, nearly half of employees anticipate having the alternative to telecommute and among which 71% expect to work from home at least twice a week after the pandemic. In the post-pandemic period, auto and transit commuters are expected to be 9% and 31% less than pre-pandemic, respectively. A considerable rise in hybrid work and grocery/non-grocery online shopping is expected. Moreover, 41% of pre-covid business travelers expect to have fewer flights (after the pandemic) while only 8% anticipate more, compared to the pre-pandemic. Upon our analyses, we discuss a spectrum of policy implications in all mentioned areas.

econ.GN↗

The potential stickiness of pandemic-induced behavior changes in the United States

Human behavior is notoriously difficult to change, but a disruption of the magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to bring about long-term behavioral changes. During the pandemic, people have been forced to experience new ways of interacting, working, learning, shopping, traveling, and eating meals. A critical question going forward is how these experiences have actually changed preferences and habits in ways that might persist after the pandemic ends. Many observers have suggested theories about what the future will bring, but concrete evidence has been lacking. We present evidence on how much U.S. adults expect their own post-pandemic choices to differ from their pre-pandemic lifestyles in the areas of telecommuting, restaurant patronage, air travel, online shopping, transit use, car commuting, uptake of walking and biking, and home location. The analysis is based on a nationally-representative survey dataset collected between July and October 2020. Key findings include that the new normal will feature a doubling of telecommuting, reduced air travel, and improved quality of life for some.

stat.OT↗

Applying Deep Learning to Detect Traffic Accidents in Real Time Using Spatiotemporal Sequential Data

Accident detection is a vital part of traffic safety. Many road users suffer from traffic accidents, as well as their consequences such as delay, congestion, air pollution, and so on. In this study, we utilize two advanced deep learning techniques, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), to detect traffic accidents in Chicago. These two techniques are selected because they are known to perform well with sequential data (i.e., time series). The full dataset consists of 241 accident and 6,038 non-accident cases selected from Chicago expressway, and it includes traffic spatiotemporal data, weather condition data, and congestion status data. Moreover, because the dataset is imbalanced (i.e., the dataset contains many more non-accident cases than accident cases), Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) is employed. Overall, the two models perform significantly well, both with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.85. Nonetheless, the GRU model is observed to perform slightly better than LSTM model with respect to detection rate. The performance of both models is similar in terms of false alarm rate.

stat.ML↗