SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Rizhou Liang

Publications and source records attributed to Rizhou Liang.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Emergence of cooperation in a population with bimodal response behaviors

We human beings show remarkable adaptability in response to complex surroundings, we adopt different behavioral modes at different occasions, such response multimodality is critical to our survival. Yet, how this behavioral multimodality affects the evolution of cooperation remains largely unknown. Here we build a toy model to address this issue by considering a population with bimodal response behaviors, or specifically, with the Fermi and Tit-for-tat updating rules. While the former rule tends to imitate the strategies of those neighbors who are doing well, the latter repeats what their neighbors did to them. In a structural mixing implementation, where the updating rule is fixed for each individual, we find that a moderate mode mixture unexpectedly boosts the overall cooperation level of the population. The boost is even more pronounced in the probabilistic mixing, where each individual randomly chooses one of the two modes at each step, and full cooperation is seen in a wide range. These findings are robust to the underlying topology of the population. Our mean-field treatment reveals that the cooperation prevalence within the players with the Fermi rule linearly increases with the fraction of TFT players and explains the non-monotonic dependence in the structural mixing. Our study shows that the diversity in response behaviors may help to explain the emergence of cooperation in realistic contexts.

physics.soc-ph

Probabilistic fair behaviors spark its boost in the Ultimatum Game: the strength of good Samaritans

Behavioral experiments on the Ultimatum Game have shown that we human beings have remarkable preference in fair play, contradicting the predictions by the game theory. Most of the existing models seeking for explanations, however, strictly follow the assumption of \emph{Homo economicus} in orthodox Economics that people are self-interested and fully rational to maximize their earnings. Here we relax this assumption by allowing that people probabilistically choose to be "good Samaritans", acting as fair players from time to time. For well-mixed and homogeneously structured populations, we numerically show that as this probability increases the level of fairness undergoes from the low scenario abruptly to the full fairness state, where occasional fair behaviors ($\sim5\%$) are sufficient to drive the whole population to behave in the half-half split manner. We also develop a mean-field theory, which correctly reproduces the first-order phase transition and points out that the bistability is an intrinsic property of this game and small fair acts lead to dramatical change due to its bifurcation structure. Heterogeneously structured populations, however, display continuous fairness transition; surprisingly, very few hub nodes acting as fair players are able to entrain the whole population to the full fairness state. Our results thus reveal the unexpected strength of "good Samaritans", which may constitute a new explanation for the emergence of fairness in our society.

q-bio.PE

Emergent route towards cooperation in interacting games: the dynamical reciprocity

The success of modern civilization is built upon widespread cooperation in human society, deciphering the mechanisms behind has being a major goal for centuries. A crucial fact is, however, largely missing in most prior studies that games in the real world are typically played simultaneously and interactively rather than separately as assumed. Here we introduce the idea of interacting games that different games coevolve and influence each other's decision-making. We show that as the game-game interaction becomes important, the cooperation phase transition dramatically improves, a fairly high level of cooperation is reached for all involved games when interaction goes to be strong. A mean-field theory indicates that a new mechanism -- \emph{the dynamical reciprocity}, as a counterpart to the well-known network reciprocity, is at work to foster cooperation, which is confirmed by the detailed analysis. This revealed reciprocity is robust against variations in the game type, the population structure, and the updating rules etc, and more games generally yield a higher level of cooperation. Our findings point out the great potential towards high cooperation for many issues are interwoven with each other in the real world, and also the possibility of sustaining decent cooperation even in extremely adverse circumstances.

physics.soc-ph

Dynamical reciprocity in interacting games: numerical results and mechanism analysis

We study the evolution of two mutually interacting games with both pairwise games as well as the public goods game on different topologies. On 2d square lattices, we reveal that the game-game interaction can promote the cooperation prevalence in all cases, and the cooperation-defection phase transitions even become absent and fairly high cooperation is expected when the interaction goes to be very strong. A mean-field theory is developed that points out new dynamical routes arising therein. Detailed analysis shows indeed that there are rich categories of interactions in either individual or bulk scenario: invasion, neutral, and catalyzed types; their combination puts cooperators at a persistent advantage position, which boosts the cooperation. The robustness of the revealed reciprocity is strengthened by the studies of model variants, including asymmetrical or time-varying interactions, games of different types, games with time-scale separation, different updating rules etc. The structural complexities of the underlying population, such as Newman--Watts small world networks, Erdős--Rényi random networks, and Barabási--Albert networks, also do not alter the working of the dynamical reciprocity. In particular, as the number of games engaged increases, the cooperation level continuously improves in general. Our work thus uncovers a new class of cooperation mechanism and indicates the great potential for human cooperation where concurrent issues are so often seen in the real world.

physics.soc-ph

Social hierarchy promotes the cooperation prevalence

Social hierarchy is important that can not be ignored in human socioeconomic activities and in the animal world. Here we incorporate this factor into the evolutionary game to see what impact it could have on the cooperation outcome. The probabilistic strategy adoption between two players is then not only determined by their payoffs, but also by their hierarchy difference -- players in the high rank are more likely to reproduce their strategies than the peers in the low rank. Through simulating the evolution of Prisoners' dilemma game with three hierarchical distributions, we find that the levels of cooperation are enhanced in all cases, and the enhancement is optimal in the uniform case. The enhancement is due to the fact that the presence of hierarchy facilitates the formation of cooperation clusters with high-rank players acting as the nucleation cores. This mechanism remains valid on Barabási-Albert scale-free networks, in particular the cooperation enhancement is maximal when the hubs are of higher social ranks. We also study a two-hierarchy model, where similar cooperation promotion is revealed and some theoretical analyses are provided. Our finding may partially explain why the social hierarchy is so ubiquitous on this planet.

physics.soc-ph