arXiv subjects

Robert Brunstein

Publications and source records attributed to Robert Brunstein.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Evaluating Skill and Stability of ArchesWeather and ArchesWeatherGen under Multi-Decadal Climate Simulations

We evaluate the climate simulation capabilities of ArchesWeather and ArchesWeatherGen, two machine learning models originally trained for weather forecasting and evaluated up to a 10-day lead time. ArchesWeather is a deterministic model, while ArchesWeatherGen is a probabilistic flow-matching model leveraging ArchesWeather's forecasts, enabling ensemble-based uncertainty quantification. In this work, we adapt these models to act as forced atmospheric models by using additional conditioning on the monthly mean sea surface temperature (SST) and sea ice cover (SIC) as boundary conditions. In particular, we follow the AI Model Intercomparison Project (AIMIP) Phase 1 protocol, which, analogous to the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP), proposes a standardized experimental setup to evaluate the climate skill of ML-based forced atmospheric models. We present a comprehensive evaluation of both models under these conditions, including comparison against numerical climate models, ablation studies that examine key design choices in the extension, and an analysis of forced versus unforced configurations. Despite being originally developed for weather forecasting, we demonstrate that forced configurations of ArchesWeather and ArchesWeatherGen produce stable long-term climate simulations, have a stable annual cycle, and capture the drift of many climate variables. The models faithfully reproduce ERA5's climatology, large-scale circulations and interannual variability, and they capture the tails of the distributions.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

AIMIP Phase 1: systematic evaluations of AI weather and climate models

We present the AI weather and climate model intercomparison project (AIMIP), phase 1. Drawing from the rich tradition of intercomparisons in climate model development, we specify a common experiment, output data format, and training constraints (namely, training against historical reanalysis data) for AIMIP Phase 1 models. We aim to identify differences in modeling frameworks and AI architectural choices that influence model behavior, and build trust in AI weather and climate models through open data and evaluation. AIMIP Phase 1 models must simulate the atmosphere given specified historical sea surface temperatures over 1979-2024. We evaluate the models' performance using five major evaluation criteria: biases, trends, response to El Ni\~{n}o-related sea surface temperature anomalies, temporal variability, and out-of-sample generalization tests. We find that the AI models are able to simulate the historical climate and response to forcing as well as a conventional physically-based model, but some AI models underestimate historical warming trends, and their predictions diverge in the out-of-sample generalization tests. We describe the AIMIP Phase 1 dataset that is publicly available for additional evaluations.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

How Can Machine Learning Emulators Best Support Climate Science?

For decades, physics-based climate models have been used to provide insights for climate decision-making. Their application is, however, constrained by significant computational and technical demands. Machine learning (ML) emulators offer a way to reduce these high computational costs; yet, it remains challenging to use ML emulators effectively in climate research. In practice, climate scientists often bypass emulators altogether, and machine learning researchers frequently develop them as methodological showcases without proving their practical utility. The reasons are diverse, ranging from limited accessibility and a lack of specialized knowledge to broader concerns about the physical grounding of ML methods. Here, we discuss limitations and introduce a framework for guiding emulator development, considering both climate science and machine learning perspectives. We argue that designing easy-to-adopt emulators that address clearly defined tasks and demonstrate their reliability is essential. This offers a promising path towards making machine-learning approaches more relevant and usable for applied climate research.

cs.LG↗