Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Robert J. Kunsch

Publications and source records attributed to Robert J. Kunsch.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Sharp bounds for non-adaptive randomized approximation of high-dimensional noisy vectors

We study the complexity of approximating the finite-dimensional vector space embedding $\ell_p^m \hookrightarrow \ell_q^m$ for $2 \leq p < q \leq \infty$ based on non-adaptive randomized algorithms that use up to $n$ arbitrary linear functionals as information on a problem instance $x \in \mathbb{R}^m$, where $n \ll m$. We prove lower bounds on the non-adaptive randomized approximation error with a joint dependence on $(n,m)$ matching previously known upper bounds.

math.NA↗

Adaptive and non-adaptive randomized approximation of high-dimensional vectors

We study approximation of the embedding $\ell_p^m \hookrightarrow \ell_q^m$, $1 \leq p < q \leq \infty$, based on randomized algorithms that use up to $n$ arbitrary linear functionals as information on a problem instance where $n \ll m$. By analysing adaptive methods we show upper bounds for which the information-based complexity $n$ exhibits only a $(\log\log m)$-dependence. In the case $q < \infty$ we use a multi-sensitivity approach in order to reach optimal polynomial order in $n$ for the Monte Carlo error. We also improve on non-adaptive methods for $q < \infty$ by denoising known algorithms for uniform approximation.

math.NA↗

Uniform approximation of vectors using adaptive randomized information

We study approximation of the embedding $\ell_p^m \rightarrow \ell_{\infty}^m$, $1 \leq p \leq 2$, based on randomized adaptive algorithms that use arbitrary linear functionals as information on a problem instance. We show upper bounds for which the complexity $n$ exhibits only a $(\log\log m)$-dependence. Our results for $p=1$ lead to an example of a gap of order $n$ (up to logarithmic factors) for the error between best adaptive and non-adaptive Monte Carlo methods. This is the largest possible gap for linear problems.

math.NA↗

Linear Monte Carlo quadrature with optimal confidence intervals

We study the numerical integration of functions from isotropic Sobolev spaces $W_p^s([0,1]^d)$ using finitely many function evaluations within randomized algorithms, aiming for the smallest possible probabilistic error guarantee $\varepsilon > 0$ at confidence level $1-δ\in (0,1)$. For spaces consisting of continuous functions, non-linear Monte Carlo methods with optimal confidence properties have already been known, in few cases even linear methods that succeed in that respect. In this paper we promote a new method called stratified control variates (SCV) and by it show that already linear methods achieve optimal probabilistic error rates in the high smoothness regime without the need to adjust algorithmic parameters to the uncertainty $δ$. We also analyse a version of SCV in the low smoothness regime where $W_p^s([0,1]^d)$ may contain functions with singularities. Here, we observe a polynomial dependence of the error on $δ^{-1}$ which cannot be avoided for linear methods. This is worse than what is known to be possible using non-linear algorithms where only a logarithmic dependence on $δ^{-1}$ occurs if we tune in for a specific value of $δ$.

math.NA↗

Expected dispersion of uniformly distributed points

The dispersion of a point set in $[0,1]^d$ is the volume of the largest axis parallel box inside the unit cube that does not intersect with the point set. We study the expected dispersion with respect to a random set of $n$ points determined by an i.i.d. sequence of uniformly distributed random variables. Depending on the number of points $n$ and the dimension $d$ we provide an upper and lower bound of the expected dispersion. In particular, we show that the minimal number of points required to achieve an expected dispersion less than $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$ depends linearly on the dimension $d$.

math.PR↗

Solvable Integration Problems and Optimal Sample Size Selection

We compute the integral of a function or the expectation of a random variable with minimal cost and use, for our new algorithm and for upper bounds of the complexity, i.i.d. samples. Under certain assumptions it is possible to select a sample size based on a variance estimation, or -- more generally -- based on an estimation of a (central absolute) $p$-moment. That way one can guarantee a small absolute error with high probability, the problem is thus called solvable. The expected cost of the method depends on the $p$-moment of the random variable, which can be arbitrarily large. In order to prove the optimality of our algorithm we also provide lower bounds. These bounds apply not only to methods based on i.i.d. samples but also to general randomized algorithms. They show that -- up to constants -- the cost of the algorithm is optimal in terms of accuracy, confidence level, and norm of the particular input random variable. Since the considered classes of random variables or integrands are very large, the worst case cost would be infinite. Nevertheless one can define adaptive stopping rules such that for each input the expected cost is finite. We contrast these positive results with examples of integration problems that are not solvable.

math.NA↗

Optimal confidence for Monte Carlo integration of smooth functions

We study the complexity of approximating integrals of smooth functions at absolute precision $\varepsilon > 0$ with confidence level $1 - δ\in (0,1)$. The optimal error rate for multivariate functions from classical isotropic Sobolev spaces $W_p^r(G)$ with sufficient smoothness on bounded Lipschitz domains $G \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ is determined. It turns out that the integrability index $p$ has an effect on the influence of the uncertainty $δ$ in the complexity. In the limiting case $p = 1$ we see that deterministic methods cannot be improved by randomization. In general, higher smoothness reduces the additional effort for diminishing the uncertainty. Finally, we add a discussion about this problem for function spaces with mixed smoothness.

math.NA↗

The Difficulty of Monte Carlo Approximation of Multivariate Monotone Functions

We study the $L_1$-approximation of $d$-variate monotone functions based on information from $n$ function evaluations. It is known that this problem suffers from the curse of dimensionality in the deterministic setting, that is, the number $n(\varepsilon,d)$ of function evaluations needed in order to approximate an unknown monotone function within a given error threshold $\varepsilon$ grows at least exponentially in $d$. This is not the case in the randomized setting (Monte Carlo setting) where the complexity $n(\varepsilon,d)$ grows exponentially in $\sqrt{d}$ (modulo logarithmic terms) only. An algorithm exhibiting this complexity is presented. Still, the problem remains difficult as best known methods are deterministic if $\varepsilon$ is comparably small, namely $\varepsilon \preceq 1/\sqrt{d}$. This inherent difficulty is confirmed by lower complexity bounds which reveal a joint $(\varepsilon,d)$-dependency and from which we deduce that the problem is not weakly tractable.

math.NA↗

Breaking the Curse for Uniform Approximation in Hilbert Spaces via Monte Carlo Methods

We study the $L_{\infty}$-approximation of $d$-variate functions from Hilbert spaces via linear functionals as information. It is a common phenomenon in tractability studies that unweighted problems (with each dimension being equally important) suffer from the curse of dimensionality in the deterministic setting, that is, the number $n(\varepsilon,d)$ of information needed in order to solve a problem to within a given accuracy $\varepsilon > 0$ grows exponentially in $d$. We show that for certain approximation problems in periodic tensor product spaces, in particular Korobov spaces with smoothness $r > 1/2$, switching to the randomized setting can break the curse of dimensionality, now having polynomial tractability, namely $n(\varepsilon,d) \preceq \varepsilon^{-2} \, d \, (1 + \log d)$. Similar benefits of Monte Carlo methods in terms of tractability have only been known for integration problems so far.

math.NA↗

Monte Carlo Methods for Uniform Approximation on Periodic Sobolev Spaces with Mixed Smoothness

We consider the order of convergence for linear and nonlinear Monte Carlo approximation of compact embeddings from Sobolev spaces of dominating mixed smoothness defined on the torus $\mathbb{T}^d$ into the space $L_{\infty}(\mathbb{T}^d)$ via methods that use arbitrary linear information. These cases are interesting because we can gain a speedup of up to $1/2$ in the main rate compared to the worst case approximation. In doing so we determine the rate for some cases that have been left open by Fang and Duan.

math.NA↗

High-Dimensional Function Approximation: Breaking the Curse with Monte Carlo Methods

In this dissertation we study the tractability of the information-based complexity $n(\varepsilon,d)$ for $d$-variate function approximation problems. In the deterministic setting for many unweighted problems the curse of dimensionality holds, that means, for some fixed error tolerance $\varepsilon>0$ the complexity $n(\varepsilon,d)$ grows exponentially in $d$. For integration problems one can usually break the curse with the standard Monte Carlo method. For function approximation problems, however, similar effects of randomization have been unknown so far. The thesis contains results on three more or less stand-alone topics. For an extended five page abstract, see the section "Introduction and Results". Chapter 2 is concerned with lower bounds for the Monte Carlo error for general linear problems via Bernstein numbers. This technique is applied to the $L_{\infty}$-approximation of certain classes of $C^{\infty}$-functions, where it turns out that randomization does not affect the tractability classification of the problem. Chapter 3 studies the $L_{\infty}$-approximation of functions from Hilbert spaces with methods that may use arbitrary linear functionals as information. For certain classes of periodic functions from unweighted periodic tensor product spaces, in particular Korobov spaces, we observe the curse of dimensionality in the deterministic setting, while with randomized methods we achieve polynomial tractability. Chapter 4 deals with the $L_1$-approximation of monotone functions via function values. It is known that this problem suffers from the curse in the deterministic setting. An improved lower bound shows that the problem is still intractable in the randomized setting. However, Monte Carlo breaks the curse, in detail, for any fixed error tolerance $\varepsilon>0$ the complexity $n(\varepsilon,d)$ grows exponentially in $\sqrt{d}$ only.

math.NA↗