SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Robin Guillard

Publications and source records attributed to Robin Guillard.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning transferable human physiology from two million hours of sleep with SleepFM-2

Sleep provides a nightly window into health by capturing coordinated activity across the brain, heart, muscles and respiratory system. We introduce SleepFM-2, a sleep foundation model developed and evaluated on 282,511 polysomnography recordings from 26 cohorts, including 235,865 used for pretraining. These data span more than two million hours of multimodal physiology. Compared with SleepFM, SleepFM-2 improves disease prediction and sleep scoring, supports arousal, limb movement and respiratory event detection, and transfers to wearable sensing and subjective sleep phenotypes. A model combining its PSG representation with age, sex and BMI met a prespecified discrimination and significance criterion for 215 subsequently recorded EHR phenotypes in two held-out cohorts, including one health system unseen during pretraining. For 155 phenotypes, the PSG representation added reproducible information beyond demographics. SleepFM-2 also outperformed a 480-feature baseline derived from the same recordings. Its disease scores revealed a reproducible principal component associated with reduced sigma-band spatial coupling and increased hypnodensity entropy. The frozen encoder performed within the observed range of expert scorers for sleep events and transferred to wakeful EEG, headband and in-ear EEG, wrist PPG and wrist accelerometry. It improved sleep staging across six accelerometry cohorts and achieved disease-prediction performance in UK Biobank similar to models pretrained directly on accelerometry. Finally, SleepFM-2 captured aspects of subjective sleep not recovered by conventional PSG summaries, particularly reports of the recorded night. These results show that multimodal sleep physiology can provide a transferable representation of human health across diseases, clinical tasks, sensors and subjective experience.

cs.AI

Agentic AI-enabled discovery across large-scale sleep physiology

Sleep occupies roughly one-third of human life, yet many aspects of its physiology remain poorly understood. Large polysomnography (PSG) datasets offer new opportunities to study sleep and its links to disease, but extracting insight from these recordings requires substantial expert effort and remains difficult for general-purpose AI systems. We developed AI Sleep Co-Scientist, an expert-guided environment in which human scientists direct specialist agents for hypothesis development, signal preprocessing, and statistical analysis, reviewing intermediate outputs. Each reported result is linked to the executable code that produced it. Across four cohorts of approximately 124,000 PSG recordings and more than 50 TB of raw signals, we conducted five case studies spanning how sleep physiology relates to future disease, how it distinguishes clinical phenotypes, and how sleep is organized and regulated. Diminished network-level physiological coupling during sleep was associated with incident Parkinson's disease (HR 1.48) and Alzheimer's disease (HR 1.38). A physiologically structured late-fusion sleep-age model outperformed an unconstrained early-fusion approach, and its age residual was associated with incident disease across multiple organ systems. Arousal dynamics characterized comorbid insomnia and sleep apnoea as an intermediate phenotype skewed towards obstructive sleep apnoea, distinguished by prolonged post-arousal wakefulness. Rapid eye movement (REM) bout duration tracked preceding non-REM sleep more closely than intervening wakefulness. Transient-oscillation analysis identified a fast-sigma deficit and excess centrofrontal theta activity in narcolepsy type 1. Together, these findings connect sleep to disease risk, clinical classification, and its own regulation, and show how agentic AI can support large-scale, multimodal discovery.

cs.MA

Tinnitus, lucid dreaming and awakening. An online survey and theoretical implications

(1) Background: Tinnitus is the perception of phantom sound in the absence of a corresponding external source. Previous studies reported that the presence of tinnitus is notably absent during dreams. This study aimed at replicating previous findings regarding tinnitus-free dreams, while also gaining a deeper understanding of tinnitus manifestations during dreams and after awakening. (2) Methods: For this observational study, 195 tinnitus patients answered an online survey on the mutual-help community Siopi. (3) Results: 160 patients could recall their dreams. Among them, 92.5% state they do not hear their tinnitus while dreaming. The rest (7.5%) report higher tinnitus burden, higher stress and more often exhibit objective tinnitus and/or tinnitus related to peripheral auditory pathology and/or drug intake. 13% of the participants frequently experience lucid dreams. Among them, 36% could perceive their tinnitus during lucid dreams, and this was strongly associated with the concomitant perception of external sounds during lucid dreaming. While the majority of patients report perceiving their tinnitus instantly upon awakening, during nocturnal awakenings, 18% declared they could be awakened by their tinnitus and 9.8% mentioned that their tinnitus can temporarily cease. (4) Conclusions: Our findings confirm the previous findings: tinnitus is rarely perceived during dreams. Remarkably, our study is the first to document the case of tinnitus during lucid dreaming. 64% of these patients gain higher-order consciousness attributes while still experiencing a tinnitus-free state. Our observations suggest that the presence or absence of gating of external auditory information during dreams acts as a tinnitus on-off switch, refining the previously proposed integrative model of auditory phantom perception.

q-bio.NC

Why does tinnitus vary with naps? A polysomnographic prospective study exploring the somatosensory hypothesis

Background: Tinnitus, defined as the conscious awareness of a noise without any identifiable corresponding external acoustic source, can be modulated by various factors. Among these factors, tinnitus patients commonly report drastic increases of tinnitus loudness following nap sleep. Previous studies have suggested that this clinical pattern could be attributed to a somatosensory modulation of tinnitus. To our knowledge, no polysomnographic study has been carried out to assess this hypothesis. Methods: For this observational prospective study, 37 participants reporting frequent increases of tinnitus following naps were recruited. They participated to six full-polysomnography nap attempts over two days. Audiological and kinesiologic tests were conducted before and after each nap attempt. Results: 197 naps were collected. Each nap at each time of day elicited an overall significant increase in tinnitus minimum masking level (MML). Each inter nap period elicited an overall significant decrease. Tinnitus modulations were found significantly correlated with nap sleep duration (Visual numeric scale on tinnitus loudness, VNS-L, p < 0.05), with snoring duration (MML, p < 0.001), with snoring average sound level (VNS on tinnitus intrusiveness, VNS-I, p < 0.05) and with sleep apnea count (VNS-I, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms objectively that tinnitus may increase following naps. No association was found between these modulations and somatosensory modulations involving the temporomandibular joint and cervical areas. However, it may be possible that nap-induced tinnitus modulations are a hidden form of somatosensory modulation as snoring and sleep apnea events are often related to tensor veli palatini muscle dysfunction.

q-bio.NC

Nap-induced modulations of tinnitus -a cross-sectional database analysis

The influence of naps on tinnitus was systematically assessed by exploring the frequency, clinical and demographic characteristics of this phenomenon. 9,724 data from two different tinnitus databases (Tinnitus Hub: $n = 6115$; Tinnitus Research Initiative (TRI): $n = 3627$) were included. After separate analysis of the databases, these results were then compared with each other. In the Tinnitus Hub survey database, a total of 31.1% reported an influence on tinnitus by taking a nap (26.9% in the TRI database), with much more frequent worsening after a nap than improvement (23.0% a little or a lot worse; TRI: 17.7% worse; 8.1% a little or a lot better; TRI: 9.2% better). The influence of napping on tinnitus was associated in both databases with other clinical features, such as the dependence of tinnitus on night quality, stress and somatosensory maneuvers. The present study confirms the clinical observation that more tinnitus sufferers report worsening after a nap than tinnitus sufferers reporting an improvement. It was consistently shown that tinnitus sufferers reporting nap-induced modulation of tinnitus also report more frequently an influence of night sleep on their tinnitus. Further clinical and polysomnographic research is warranted to better understand the interaction between sleep and tinnitus.

q-bio.NC