arXiv subjects

Roland Backhouse

Publications and source records attributed to Roland Backhouse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

The Index and Core of a Relation. With Applications to the Axiomatics of Relation Algebra

We introduce the general notions of an index and a core of a relation. We postulate a limited form of the axiom of choice -- specifically that all partial equivalence relations have an index -- and explore the consequences of adding the axiom to standard axiom systems for point-free reasoning. Examples of the theorems we prove are that a core/index of a difunction is a bijection, and that the so-called ``all or nothing'' axiom used to facilitate pointwise reasoning is derivable from our axiom of choice.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

An example of goal-directed, calculational proof

An equivalence relation can be constructed from a given (homogeneous, binary) relation in two steps: first, construct the smallest reflexive and transitive relation containing the given relation (the "star" of the relation) and, second, construct the largest symmetric relation that is included in the result of the first step. The fact that the final result is also reflexive and transitive (as well as symmetric), and thus an equivalence relation, is not immediately obvious, although straightforward to prove. Rather than prove that the defining properties of reflexivity and transitivity are satisfied, we establish reflexivity and transitivity constructively by exhibiting a particular starth root -- in a way that emphasises the creative process in its construction. The constructed starth root is fundamental to algorithms that determine the strongly connected components of a graph as well as the decomposition of a graph into its strongly connected components together with an acyclic graph connecting such components.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

The Thins Ordering on Relations

Earlier papers \cite{VB2022,VB2023a,VB2023b} introduced the notions of a core and an index of a relation (an index being a special case of a core). A limited form of the axiom of choice was postulated -- specifically that all partial equivalence relations (pers) have an index -- and the consequences of adding the axiom to axiom systems for point-free reasoning were explored. In this paper, we define a partial ordering on relations, which we call the \textsf{thins} ordering. We show that our axiom of choice is equivalent to the property that core relations are the minimal elements of the \textsf{thins} ordering. We also characterise the relations that are maximal with respect to the \textsf{thins} ordering. Apart from our axiom of choice, the axiom system we employ is paired to a bare minimum and admits many models other than concrete relations -- we do not assume, for example, the existence of complements; in the case of concrete relations, the theorem is that the maximal elements of the \textsf{thins} ordering are the empty relation and the equivalence relations. This and other properties of \textsf{thins} provide further evidence that our axiom of choice is a desirable means of strengthening point-free reasoning on relations.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Diagonals and Block-Ordered Relations

More than 70 years ago, Jaques Riguet suggested the existence of an ``analogie frappante'' (striking analogy) between so-called ``relations de Ferrers'' and a class of difunctional relations, members of which we call ``diagonals''. Inspired by his suggestion, we formulate an ``analogie frappante'' linking the notion of a block-ordered relation and the notion of the diagonal of a relation. We formulate several novel properties of the core/index of a diagonal, and use these properties to rephrase our ``analogie frappante''. Loosely speaking, we show that a block-ordered relation is a provisional ordering up to isomorphism and reduction to its core. (Our theorems make this informal statement precise.) Unlike Riguet (and others who follow his example), we avoid almost entirely the use of nested complements to express and reason about properties of these notions: we use factors (aka residuals) instead. The only (and inevitable) exception to this is to show that our definition of a ``staircase'' relation is equivalent to Riguet's definition of a ``relation de Ferrers''. Our ``analogie frappante'' also makes it obvious that a ``staircase'' relation is not necessarily block-ordered, in spite of the mental picture of such a relation presented by Riguet.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2015

On Euclid's Algorithm and Elementary Number Theory

Algorithms can be used to prove and to discover new theorems. This paper shows how algorithmic skills in general, and the notion of invariance in particular, can be used to derive many results from Euclid's algorithm. We illustrate how to use the algorithm as a verification interface (i.e., how to verify theorems) and as a construction interface (i.e., how to investigate and derive new theorems). The theorems that we verify are well-known and most of them are included in standard number theory books. The new results concern distributivity properties of the greatest common divisor and a new algorithm for efficiently enumerating the positive rationals in two different ways. One way is known and is due to Moshe Newman. The second is new and corresponds to a deforestation of the Stern-Brocot tree of rationals. We show that both enumerations stem from the same simple algorithm. In this way, we construct a Stern-Brocot enumeration algorithm with the same time and space complexity as Newman's algorithm. A short review of the original papers by Stern and Brocot is also included.

cs.DS↗