arXiv subjects

Roman Yakymiv

Publications and source records attributed to Roman Yakymiv.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Some central limit theorems for critical beta-splitting tree

We further explore a connection initially unveiled in Iksanov (2025) between critical beta-splitting trees and infinite `balls-in-boxes' schemes. Using the connection, we derive a new joint central limit theorem for components of the height of a leaf chosen uniformly at random in the discrete version of a critical beta-splitting tree. Also, we obtain a joint central limit theorem for the heights in the discrete and continuous versions of a critical beta-splitting tree.

math.PR↗

arXiv2021

On $q$-tensor products of Cuntz algebras

We consider the $C^*$-algebra $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$, which is a $q$-twist of two Cuntz-Toeplitz algebras. For the case $|q|<1$, we give an explicit formula which untwists the $q$-deformation showing that the isomorphism class of $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$ does not depend on $q$. For the case $|q|=1$, we give an explicit description of all ideals in $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$. In particular, we show that $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$ contains a unique largest ideal $\mathcal{M}_q$. We identify $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q / \mathcal{M}_q$ with the Rieffel deformation of $\mathcal{O}_n \otimes \mathcal{O}_m$ and use a K-theoretical argument to show that the isomorphism class does not depend on $q$. The latter result holds true in a more general setting of multiparameter deformations.

math.OA↗

arXiv2019

On $q$-tensor product of Cuntz algebras

We consider $C^*$-algebra $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$, which is a $q$-twist of two Cuntz-Toeplitz algebras. For the case $|q|<1$ we give an explicit formula, which untwists the $q$-deformation, thus showing that the isomorphism class of $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$ does not depend of $q$. For the case $|q|=1$ we give an explicit description of all ideals in $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$. In particular $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q$ contains unique largest ideal $\mathcal{M}_q$. Then we identify $\mathcal{E}_{n,m}^q / \mathcal{M}_q$ with the Rieffel deformation of $\mathcal{O}_n \otimes \mathcal{O}_m$ and use a K-theoretical argument to show that the isomorphism class does not depend on $q$.

math.OA↗