arXiv subjects

Ronald de Wolf

Publications and source records attributed to Ronald de Wolf.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Near-Optimal and Explicit Bell Inequality Violations

Entangled quantum systems can exhibit correlations that cannot be simulated classically. For historical reasons such correlations are called "Bell inequality violations." We give two new two-player games with Bell inequality violations that are stronger, fully explicit, and arguably simpler than earlier work. The first game is based on the Hidden Matching problem of quantum communication complexity, introduced by Bar-Yossef, Jayram, and Kerenidis. This game can be won with probability 1 by a strategy using a maximally entangled state with local dimension $n$ (e.g., $\log n$ EPR-pairs), while we show that the winning probability of any classical strategy differs from ${1}/{2}$ by at most $O((\log n)/\sqrt{n})$. The second game is based on the integrality gap for Unique Games by Khot and Vishnoi and the quantum rounding procedure of Kempe, Regev, and Toner. Here $n$-dimensional entanglement allows the game to be won with probability $1/(\log n)^2$, while the best winning probability without entanglement is $1/n$. This near-linear ratio is almost optimal, both in terms of the local dimension of the entangled state, and in terms of the number of possible outputs of the two players.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Exact quantum query complexity of computing Hamming weight modulo powers of two and three

We study the problem of computing the Hamming weight of an $n$-bit string modulo $m$, for any positive integer $m \leq n$ whose only prime factors are 2 and 3. We show that the exact quantum query complexity of this problem is $\left\lceil n(1 - 1/m) \right\rceil$. The upper bound is via an iterative query algorithm whose core components are the well-known 1-query quantum algorithm (essentially due to Deutsch) to compute the Hamming weight a 2-bit string mod 2 (i.e., the parity of the input bits), and a new 2-query quantum algorithm to compute the Hamming weight of a 3-bit string mod 3. We show a matching lower bound (in fact for arbitrary moduli $m$) via a variant of the polynomial method [de Wolf, SIAM J. Comput., 32(3), 2003]. This bound is for the weaker task of deciding whether or not a given $n$-bit input has Hamming weight 0 modulo $m$, and it holds even in the stronger non-deterministic quantum query model where an algorithm must have positive acceptance probability iff its input evaluates to 1. For $m>2$ our lower bound exceeds $n/2$, beating the best lower bound provable using the general polynomial method [Theorem 4.3, Beals et al., J. ACM 48(4), 2001].

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Two new results about quantum exact learning

We present two new results about exact learning by quantum computers. First, we show how to exactly learn a $k$-Fourier-sparse $n$-bit Boolean function from $O(k^{1.5}(\log k)^2)$ uniform quantum examples for that function. This improves over the bound of $\widetildeΘ(kn)$ uniformly random \emph{classical} examples (Haviv and Regev, CCC'15). Additionally, we provide a possible direction to improve our $\widetilde{O}(k^{1.5})$ upper bound by proving an improvement of Chang's lemma for $k$-Fourier-sparse Boolean functions. Second, we show that if a concept class $\mathcal{C}$ can be exactly learned using $Q$ quantum membership queries, then it can also be learned using $O\left(\frac{Q^2}{\log Q}\log|\mathcal{C}|\right)$ \emph{classical} membership queries. This improves the previous-best simulation result (Servedio and Gortler, SICOMP'04) by a $\log Q$-factor.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Improved bounds on Fourier entropy and Min-entropy

Given a Boolean function $f:\{-1,1\}^n\to \{-1,1\}$, the Fourier distribution assigns probability $\widehat{f}(S)^2$ to $S\subseteq [n]$. The Fourier Entropy-Influence (FEI) conjecture of Friedgut and Kalai asks if there exist a universal constant C>0 such that $H(\hat{f}^2)\leq C Inf(f)$, where $H(\hat{f}^2)$ is the Shannon entropy of the Fourier distribution of $f$ and $Inf(f)$ is the total influence of $f$. 1) We consider the weaker Fourier Min-entropy-Influence (FMEI) conjecture. This asks if $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)\leq C Inf(f)$, where $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)$ is the min-entropy of the Fourier distribution. We show $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)\leq 2C_{\min}^\oplus(f)$, where $C_{\min}^\oplus(f)$ is the minimum parity certificate complexity of $f$. We also show that for every $ε\geq 0$, we have $H_{\infty}(\hat{f}^2)\leq 2\log (\|\hat{f}\|_{1,ε}/(1-ε))$, where $\|\hat{f}\|_{1,ε}$ is the approximate spectral norm of $f$. As a corollary, we verify the FMEI conjecture for the class of read-$k$ $DNF$s (for constant $k$). 2) We show that $H(\hat{f}^2)\leq 2 aUC^\oplus(f)$, where $aUC^\oplus(f)$ is the average unambiguous parity certificate complexity of $f$. This improves upon Chakraborty et al. An important consequence of the FEI conjecture is the long-standing Mansour's conjecture. We show that a weaker version of FEI already implies Mansour's conjecture: is $H(\hat{f}^2)\leq C \min\{C^0(f),C^1(f)\}$?, where $C^0(f), C^1(f)$ are the 0- and 1-certificate complexities of $f$, respectively. 3) We study what FEI implies about the structure of polynomials that 1/3-approximate a Boolean function. We pose a conjecture (which is implied by FEI): no "flat" degree-$d$ polynomial of sparsity $2^{ω(d)}$ can 1/3-approximate a Boolean function. We prove this conjecture unconditionally for a particular class of polynomials.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

A Guide for New Program Committee Members at Theoretical Computer Science Conferences

In theoretical computer science, conferences play an important role in the scientific process. The decisions whether to accept or reject articles is taken by the program committee (PC) members. Serving on a PC for the first time can be a daunting experience. This guide will help new program-committee members to understand how the system works, and provide useful tips and guidelines. It discusses every phase of the paper-selection process, and the tasks associated to it.

cs.GL↗

arXiv2021

Lightweight Detection of a Small Number of Large Errors in a Quantum Circuit

Suppose we want to implement a unitary $U$, for instance a circuit for some quantum algorithm. Suppose our actual implementation is a unitary $\tilde{U}$, which we can only apply as a black-box. In general it is an exponentially-hard task to decide whether $\tilde{U}$ equals the intended $U$, or is significantly different in a worst-case norm. In this paper we consider two special cases where relatively efficient and lightweight procedures exist for this task. First, we give an efficient procedure under the assumption that $U$ and $\tilde{U}$ (both of which we can now apply as a black-box) are either equal, or differ significantly in only one $k$-qubit gate, where $k=O(1)$ (the $k$ qubits need not be contiguous). Second, we give an even more lightweight procedure under the assumption that $U$ and $\tilde{U}$ are Clifford circuits which are either equal, or different in arbitrary ways (the specification of $U$ is now classically given while $\tilde{U}$ can still only be applied as a black-box). Both procedures only need to run $\tilde{U}$ a constant number of times to detect a constant error in a worst-case norm. We note that the Clifford result also follows from earlier work of Flammia and Liu, and da Silva, Landon-Cardinal, and Poulin. In the Clifford case, our error-detection procedure also allows us efficiently to learn (and hence correct) $\tilde{U}$ if we have a small list of possible errors that could have happened to $U$; for example if we know that only $O(1)$ of the gates of $\tilde{U}$ are wrong, this list will be polynomially small and we can test each possible erroneous version of $U$ for equality with $\tilde{U}$.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2020

Quantum algorithms for matrix scaling and matrix balancing

Matrix scaling and matrix balancing are two basic linear-algebraic problems with a wide variety of applications, such as approximating the permanent, and pre-conditioning linear systems to make them more numerically stable. We study the power and limitations of quantum algorithms for these problems. We provide quantum implementations of two classical (in both senses of the word) methods: Sinkhorn's algorithm for matrix scaling and Osborne's algorithm for matrix balancing. Using amplitude estimation as our main tool, our quantum implementations both run in time $\tilde O(\sqrt{mn}/\varepsilon^4)$ for scaling or balancing an $n \times n$ matrix (given by an oracle) with $m$ non-zero entries to within $\ell_1$-error $\varepsilon$. Their classical analogs use time $\tilde O(m/\varepsilon^2)$, and every classical algorithm for scaling or balancing with small constant $\varepsilon$ requires $Ω(m)$ queries to the entries of the input matrix. We thus achieve a polynomial speed-up in terms of $n$, at the expense of a worse polynomial dependence on the obtained $\ell_1$-error $\varepsilon$. We emphasize that even for constant $\varepsilon$ these problems are already non-trivial (and relevant in applications). Along the way, we extend the classical analysis of Sinkhorn's and Osborne's algorithm to allow for errors in the computation of marginals. We also adapt an improved analysis of Sinkhorn's algorithm for entrywise-positive matrices to the $\ell_1$-setting, leading to an $\tilde O(n^{1.5}/\varepsilon^3)$-time quantum algorithm for $\varepsilon$-$\ell_1$-scaling in this case. We also prove a lower bound, showing that our quantum algorithm for matrix scaling is essentially optimal for constant $\varepsilon$: every quantum algorithm for matrix scaling that achieves a constant $\ell_1$-error with respect to uniform marginals needs to make at least $Ω(\sqrt{mn})$ queries.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2020

Improved Quantum Boosting

Boosting is a general method to convert a weak learner (which generates hypotheses that are just slightly better than random) into a strong learner (which generates hypotheses that are much better than random). Recently, Arunachalam and Maity gave the first quantum improvement for boosting, by combining Freund and Schapire's AdaBoost algorithm with a quantum algorithm for approximate counting. Their booster is faster than classical boosting as a function of the VC-dimension of the weak learner's hypothesis class, but worse as a function of the quality of the weak learner. In this paper we give a substantially faster and simpler quantum boosting algorithm, based on Servedio's SmoothBoost algorithm.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2020

Quantum Coupon Collector

We study how efficiently a $k$-element set $S\subseteq[n]$ can be learned from a uniform superposition $|S\rangle$ of its elements. One can think of $|S\rangle=\sum_{i\in S}|i\rangle/\sqrt{|S|}$ as the quantum version of a uniformly random sample over $S$, as in the classical analysis of the ``coupon collector problem.'' We show that if $k$ is close to $n$, then we can learn $S$ using asymptotically fewer quantum samples than random samples. In particular, if there are $n-k=O(1)$ missing elements then $O(k)$ copies of $|S\rangle$ suffice, in contrast to the $Θ(k\log k)$ random samples needed by a classical coupon collector. On the other hand, if $n-k=Ω(k)$, then $Ω(k\log k)$ quantum samples are~necessary. More generally, we give tight bounds on the number of quantum samples needed for every $k$ and $n$, and we give efficient quantum learning algorithms. We also give tight bounds in the model where we can additionally reflect through $|S\rangle$. Finally, we relate coupon collection to a known example separating proper and improper PAC learning that turns out to show no separation in the quantum case.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2020

Quantum SDP-Solvers: Better upper and lower bounds

Brandão and Svore very recently gave quantum algorithms for approximately solving semidefinite programs, which in some regimes are faster than the best-possible classical algorithms in terms of the dimension $n$ of the problem and the number $m$ of constraints, but worse in terms of various other parameters. In this paper we improve their algorithms in several ways, getting better dependence on those other parameters. To this end we develop new techniques for quantum algorithms, for instance a general way to efficiently implement smooth functions of sparse Hamiltonians, and a generalized minimum-finding procedure. We also show limits on this approach to quantum SDP-solvers, for instance for combinatorial optimizations problems that have a lot of symmetry. Finally, we prove some general lower bounds showing that in the worst case, the complexity of every quantum LP-solver (and hence also SDP-solver) has to scale linearly with $mn$ when $m\approx n$, which is the same as classical.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2019

Convex optimization using quantum oracles

We study to what extent quantum algorithms can speed up solving convex optimization problems. Following the classical literature we assume access to a convex set via various oracles, and we examine the efficiency of reductions between the different oracles. In particular, we show how a separation oracle can be implemented using $\tilde{O}(1)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle, which is an exponential quantum speed-up over the $Ω(n)$ membership queries that are needed classically. We show that a quantum computer can very efficiently compute an approximate subgradient of a convex Lipschitz function. Combining this with a simplification of recent classical work of Lee, Sidford, and Vempala gives our efficient separation oracle. This in turn implies, via a known algorithm, that $\tilde{O}(n)$ quantum queries to a membership oracle suffice to implement an optimization oracle (the best known classical upper bound on the number of membership queries is quadratic). We also prove several lower bounds: $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ quantum separation (or membership) queries are needed for optimization if the algorithm knows an interior point of the convex set, and $Ω(n)$ quantum separation queries are needed if it does not.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2018

Exponential Separation between Quantum Communication and Logarithm of Approximate Rank

Chattopadhyay, Mande and Sherif (ECCC 2018) recently exhibited a total Boolean function, the sink function, that has polynomial approximate rank and polynomial randomized communication complexity. This gives an exponential separation between randomized communication complexity and logarithm of the approximate rank, refuting the log-approximate-rank conjecture. We show that even the quantum communication complexity of the sink function is polynomial, thus also refuting the quantum log-approximate-rank conjecture. Our lower bound is based on the fooling distribution method introduced by Rao and Sinha (ECCC 2015) for the classical case and extended by Anshu, Touchette, Yao and Yu (STOC 2017) for the quantum case. We also give a new proof of the classical lower bound using the fooling distribution method.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2018

A Survey of Quantum Property Testing

The area of property testing tries to design algorithms that can efficiently handle very large amounts of data: given a large object that either has a certain property or is somehow "far" from having that property, a tester should efficiently distinguish between these two cases. In this survey we describe recent results obtained for quantum property testing. This area naturally falls into three parts. First, we may consider quantum testers for properties of classical objects. We survey the main examples known where quantum testers can be much (sometimes exponentially) more efficient than classical testers. Second, we may consider classical testers of quantum objects. This is the situation that arises for instance when one is trying to determine if quantum states or operations do what they are supposed to do, based only on classical input-output behavior. Finally, we may also consider quantum testers for properties of quantum objects, such as states or operations. We survey known bounds on testing various natural properties, such as whether two states are equal, whether a state is separable, whether two operations commute, etc. We also highlight connections to other areas of quantum information theory and mention a number of open questions.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

The Potential Impact of Quantum Computers on Society

This paper considers the potential impact that the nascent technology of quantum computing may have on society. It focuses on three areas: cryptography, optimization, and simulation of quantum systems. We will also discuss some ethical aspects of these developments, and ways to mitigate the risks.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2017

A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory

This paper surveys quantum learning theory: the theoretical aspects of machine learning using quantum computers. We describe the main results known for three models of learning: exact learning from membership queries, and Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) and agnostic learning from classical or quantum examples.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithms

$ \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} $In learning theory, the VC dimension of a concept class $C$ is the most common way to measure its "richness." In the PAC model $$ Θ\Big(\frac{d}{\eps} + \frac{\log(1/δ)}{\eps}\Big) $$ examples are necessary and sufficient for a learner to output, with probability $1-δ$, a hypothesis $h$ that is $\eps$-close to the target concept $c$. In the related agnostic model, where the samples need not come from a $c\in C$, we know that $$ Θ\Big(\frac{d}{\eps^2} + \frac{\log(1/δ)}{\eps^2}\Big) $$ examples are necessary and sufficient to output an hypothesis $h\in C$ whose error is at most $\eps$ worse than the best concept in $C$. Here we analyze quantum sample complexity, where each example is a coherent quantum state. This model was introduced by Bshouty and Jackson, who showed that quantum examples are more powerful than classical examples in some fixed-distribution settings. However, Atici and Servedio, improved by Zhang, showed that in the PAC setting, quantum examples cannot be much more powerful: the required number of quantum examples is $$ Ω\Big(\frac{d^{1-η}}{\eps} + d + \frac{\log(1/δ)}{\eps}\Big)\mbox{ for all }η> 0. $$ Our main result is that quantum and classical sample complexity are in fact equal up to constant factors in both the PAC and agnostic models. We give two approaches. The first is a fairly simple information-theoretic argument that yields the above two classical bounds and yields the same bounds for quantum sample complexity up to a $\log(d/\eps)$ factor. We then give a second approach that avoids the log-factor loss, based on analyzing the behavior of the "Pretty Good Measurement" on the quantum state identification problems that correspond to learning. This shows classical and quantum sample complexity are equal up to constant factors.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2016

Optimizing the Number of Gates in Quantum Search

$ $In its usual form, Grover's quantum search algorithm uses $O(\sqrt{N})$ queries and $O(\sqrt{N} \log N)$ other elementary gates to find a solution in an $N$-bit database. Grover in 2002 showed how to reduce the number of other gates to $O(\sqrt{N}\log\log N)$ for the special case where the database has a unique solution, without significantly increasing the number of queries. We show how to reduce this further to $O(\sqrt{N}\log^{(r)} N)$ gates for any constant $r$, and sufficiently large $N$. This means that, on average, the gates between two queries barely touch more than a constant number of the $\log N$ qubits on which the algorithm acts. For a very large $N$ that is a power of 2, we can choose $r$ such that the algorithm uses essentially the minimal number $\fracπ{4}\sqrt{N}$ of queries, and only $O(\sqrt{N}\log(\log^{\star} N))$ other gates.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2016

On the sum-of-squares degree of symmetric quadratic functions

We study how well functions over the boolean hypercube of the form $f_k(x)=(|x|-k)(|x|-k-1)$ can be approximated by sums of squares of low-degree polynomials, obtaining good bounds for the case of approximation in $\ell_{\infty}$-norm as well as in $\ell_1$-norm. We describe three complexity-theoretic applications: (1) a proof that the recent breakthrough lower bound of Lee, Raghavendra, and Steurer on the positive semidefinite extension complexity of the correlation and TSP polytopes cannot be improved further by showing better sum-of-squares degree lower bounds on $\ell_1$-approximation of $f_k$; (2) a proof that Grigoriev's lower bound on the degree of Positivstellensatz refutations for the knapsack problem is optimal, answering an open question from his work; (3) bounds on the query complexity of quantum algorithms whose expected output approximates such functions.

cs.CC↗