SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ronilo Ragodos

Publications and source records attributed to Ronilo Ragodos.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

GeoPro-Net: Learning Interpretable Spatiotemporal Prediction Models through Statistically-Guided Geo-Prototyping

The problem of forecasting spatiotemporal events such as crimes and accidents is crucial to public safety and city management. Besides accuracy, interpretability is also a key requirement for spatiotemporal forecasting models to justify the decisions. Interpretation of the spatiotemporal forecasting mechanism is, however, challenging due to the complexity of multi-source spatiotemporal features, the non-intuitive nature of spatiotemporal patterns for non-expert users, and the presence of spatial heterogeneity in the data. Currently, no existing deep learning model intrinsically interprets the complex predictive process learned from multi-source spatiotemporal features. To bridge the gap, we propose GeoPro-Net, an intrinsically interpretable spatiotemporal model for spatiotemporal event forecasting problems. GeoPro-Net introduces a novel Geo-concept convolution operation, which employs statistical tests to extract predictive patterns in the input as Geo-concepts, and condenses the Geo-concept-encoded input through interpretable channel fusion and geographic-based pooling. In addition, GeoPro-Net learns different sets of prototypes of concepts inherently, and projects them to real-world cases for interpretation. Comprehensive experiments and case studies on four real-world datasets demonstrate that GeoPro-Net provides better interpretability while still achieving competitive prediction performance compared with state-of-the-art baselines.

cs.LG

From Model Explanation to Data Misinterpretation: A Cautionary Analysis of Post Hoc Explainers in Business Research

Post hoc explainers such as SHAP and LIME are used widely in business research to interpret complex machine learning models. Although they were designed to explain model predictions, there has been an increasing trend in which the explanations they generate are treated as evidence about underlying data relationships. Based on a systematic review of 181 studies, including 56 published in leading journals, we document that this explanation interpretation is widespread and examine its validity. We also evaluate how well post hoc explanations reliably recover the direction and relative importance of features in true data-generating process. We introduce two metrics-direction alignment and strength alignment-and assess SHAP and LIME using simulated data with known ground truth. Although explanations often appear reasonable on average, they exhibit substantial heterogeneity in their alignment and can fail to be aligned even when their predictive accuracy is high. High predictive performance is therefore necessary but insufficient for reliable explanation. We further show that feature correlation and the Rashomon effect (where many equally accurate models rely on different feature attributions) are key drivers of misalignment. Agreement in explanations across such models provides a practical diagnostic of reliability. Overall, our findings caution against using post hoc explainers for hypothesis validation and instead position them as exploratory tools that generate, rather than confirm, substantive insights.

cs.LG