arXiv subjects

Ronny Ronen

Publications and source records attributed to Ronny Ronen.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2021

The Bitlet Model: A Parameterized Analytical Model to Compare PIM and CPU Systems

Nowadays, data-intensive applications are gaining popularity and, together with this trend, processing-in-memory (PIM)-based systems are being given more attention and have become more relevant. This paper describes an analytical modeling tool called Bitlet that can be used, in a parameterized fashion, to estimate the performance and the power/energy of a PIM-based system and thereby assess the affinity of workloads for PIM as opposed to traditional computing. The tool uncovers interesting tradeoffs between, mainly, the PIM computation complexity (cycles required to perform a computation through PIM), the amount of memory used for PIM, the system memory bandwidth, and the data transfer size. Despite its simplicity, the model reveals new insights when applied to real-life examples. The model is demonstrated for several synthetic examples and then applied to explore the influence of different parameters on two systems - IMAGING and FloatPIM. Based on the demonstrations, insights about PIM and its combination with CPU are concluded.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2021

Efficient Error-Correcting-Code Mechanism for High-Throughput Memristive Processing-in-Memory

Inefficient data transfer between computation and memory inspired emerging processing-in-memory (PIM) technologies. Many PIM solutions enable storage and processing using memristors in a crossbar-array structure, with techniques such as memristor-aided logic (MAGIC) used for computation. This approach provides highly-paralleled logic computation with minimal data movement. However, memristors are vulnerable to soft errors and standard error-correcting-code (ECC) techniques are difficult to implement without moving data outside the memory. We propose a novel technique for efficient ECC implementation along diagonals to support reliable computation inside the memory without explicitly reading the data. Our evaluation demonstrates an improvement of over eight orders of magnitude in reliability (mean time to failure) for an increase of about 26% in computation latency.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2020

CONTRA: Area-Constrained Technology Mapping Framework For Memristive Memory Processing Unit

Data-intensive applications are poised to benefit directly from processing-in-memory platforms, such as memristive Memory Processing Units, which allow leveraging data locality and performing stateful logic operations. Developing design automation flows for such platforms is a challenging and highly relevant research problem. In this work, we investigate the problem of minimizing delay under arbitrary area constraint for MAGIC-based in-memory computing platforms. We propose an end-to-end area constrained technology mapping framework, CONTRA. CONTRA uses Look-Up Table(LUT) based mapping of the input function on the crossbar array to maximize parallel operations and uses a novel search technique to move data optimally inside the array. CONTRA supports benchmarks in a variety of formats, along with crossbar dimensions as input to generate MAGIC instructions. CONTRA scales for large benchmarks, as demonstrated by our experiments. CONTRA allows mapping benchmarks to smaller crossbar dimensions than achieved by any other technique before, while allowing a wide variety of area-delay trade-offs. CONTRA improves the composite metric of area-delay product by 2.1x to 13.1x compared to seven existing technology mapping approaches.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2019

The Bitlet Model: Defining a Litmus Test for the Bitwise Processing-in-Memory Paradigm

This paper describes an analytical modeling tool called Bitlet that can be used, in a parameterized fashion, to understand the affinity of workloads to processing-in-memory (PIM) as opposed to traditional computing. The tool uncovers interesting trade-offs between operation complexity (cycles required to perform an operation through PIM) and other key parameters, such as system memory bandwidth, data transfer size, the extent of data alignment, and effective memory capacity involved in PIM computations. Despite its simplicity, the model has already proven useful. In the future, we intend to extend and refine Bitlet to further increase its utility.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2017

Why & When Deep Learning Works: Looking Inside Deep Learnings

The Intel Collaborative Research Institute for Computational Intelligence (ICRI-CI) has been heavily supporting Machine Learning and Deep Learning research from its foundation in 2012. We have asked six leading ICRI-CI Deep Learning researchers to address the challenge of "Why & When Deep Learning works", with the goal of looking inside Deep Learning, providing insights on how deep networks function, and uncovering key observations on their expressiveness, limitations, and potential. The output of this challenge resulted in five papers that address different facets of deep learning. These different facets include a high-level understating of why and when deep networks work (and do not work), the impact of geometry on the expressiveness of deep networks, and making deep networks interpretable.

cs.LG↗