arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Roy Overbeek.
We refine the weighted type graph technique for proving termination of double pushout (DPO) graph transformation systems. We increase the power of the approach for graphs, we generalize the technique to other categories, and we allow for variations of DPO that occur in the literature.
We introduce a termination method for the algebraic graph transformation framework PBPO+, in which we weigh objects by summing a class of weighted morphisms targeting them. The method is well-defined in rm-adhesive quasitoposes (which include toposes and therefore many graph categories of interest), and is applicable to non-linear rules. The method is also defined for other frameworks, including SqPO and left-linear DPO, because we have previously shown that they are naturally encodable into PBPO+ in the quasitopos setting. We have implemented our method, and the implementation includes a REPL that can be used for guiding relative termination proofs.
Quasitoposes encompass a wide range of structures, including various categories of graphs. They have proven to be a natural setting for reasoning about the metatheory of algebraic graph rewriting. In this paper we propose and motivate the notion of fuzzy presheaves, which generalises fuzzy sets and fuzzy graphs. We prove that fuzzy presheaves are rm-adhesive quasitoposes, proving our recent conjecture for fuzzy graphs. Furthermore, we show that simple fuzzy graphs categories are quasitoposes.
We provide a tutorial introduction to the algebraic graph rewriting formalism PBPO+. We show how PBPO+ can be obtained by composing a few simple building blocks, and model the reduction rules for binary decision diagrams as an example. Along the way, we comment on how alternative design decisions lead to related formalisms in the literature, such as DPO. We close with a detailed comparison with Bauderon's double pullback approach.
We extend the powerful Pullback-Pushout (PBPO) approach for graph rewriting with strong matching. Our approach, called PBPO+, allows more control over the embedding of the pattern in the host graph, which is important for a large class of rewrite systems. We argue that PBPO+ can be considered a unifying theory in the general setting of quasitoposes, by demonstrating that PBPO+ can define a strict superset of the rewrite relations definable by PBPO, AGREE and DPO. Additionally, we show that PBPO+ is well suited for rewriting labeled graphs and some classes of attributed graphs, by introducing a lattice structure on the label set and requiring graph morphisms to be order-preserving.
Encodings of term rewriting systems (TRSs) into graph rewriting systems usually lose global termination, meaning the encodings do not terminate on all graphs. A typical encoding of the terminating TRS rule a(b(x)) -> b(a(x)), for example, may be indefinitely applicable along a cycle of a's and b's. Recently, we introduced PBPO+, a graph rewriting formalism in which rules employ a type graph to specify transformations and control rule applicability. In the present paper, we show that PBPO+ allows for a natural encoding of linear TRS rules that preserves termination globally. This result is a step towards modeling other rewriting formalisms, such as lambda calculus and higher order rewriting, using graph rewriting in a way that preserves properties like termination and confluence. We moreover expect that the encoding can serve as a guide for lifting TRS termination methods to PBPO+ rewriting.
We extend the powerful Pullback-Pushout (PBPO) approach for graph rewriting with strong matching. Our approach, called \pbpostrong, exerts more control over the embedding of the pattern in the host graph, which is important for a large class of graph rewrite systems. In addition, we show that \pbpostrong is well-suited for rewriting labeled graphs and certain classes of attributed graphs. For this purpose, we employ a lattice structure on the label set and use order-preserving graph morphisms. We argue that our approach is simpler and more general than related relabeling approaches in the literature.
The basic principle of graph rewriting is the stepwise replacement of subgraphs inside a host graph. A challenge in such replacement steps is the treatment of the patch graph, consisting of those edges of the host graph that touch the subgraph, but are not part of it. We introduce the patch graph rewriting framework, a visual graph rewriting language with precise formal semantics. The language has rich expressive power in two ways. Firstly, rules can flexibly constrain the permitted shapes of patches touching matching subgraphs. Secondly, rules can freely transform patches. While the framework is designed to be easy to understand, it subsumes many approaches to graph rewriting.
The recursive path ordering is an established and crucial tool in term rewriting to prove termination. We revisit its presentation by means of some simple rules on trees (or corresponding terms) equipped with a 'star' as control symbol, signifying a command to make that tree (or term) smaller in the order being defined. This leads to star games that are very convenient for proving termination of many rewriting tasks. For instance, using already the simplest star game on finite unlabeled trees, we obtain a very direct proof of termination of the famous Hydra battle, direct in the sense that there is not the usual mention of ordinals. We also include an alternative road to setting up the star games, using a proof method of Buchholz, adapted by van Oostrom, resulting in a quantitative version of the star as control symbol. We conclude with a number of questions and future research directions.
Concurrent revisions is a concurrency control model designed to guarantee determinacy, meaning that the outcomes of programs are uniquely determined. This paper describes an Isabelle/HOL formalization of the model's operational semantics and proof of determinacy. We discuss and resolve subtle ambiguities in the operational semantics and simplify the proof of determinacy. Although our findings do not appear to correspond to bugs in implementations, the formalization highlights some of the challenges involved in the design and verification of concurrency control models.
Like termination, confluence is a central property of rewrite systems. Unlike for termination, however, there exists no known complexity hierarchy for confluence. In this paper we investigate whether the decreasing diagrams technique can be used to obtain such a hierarchy. The decreasing diagrams technique is one of the strongest and most versatile methods for proving confluence of abstract rewrite systems. It is complete for countable systems, and it has many well-known confluence criteria as corollaries. So what makes decreasing diagrams so powerful? In contrast to other confluence techniques, decreasing diagrams employ a labelling of the steps with labels from a well-founded order in order to conclude confluence of the underlying unlabelled relation. Hence it is natural to ask how the size of the label set influences the strength of the technique. In particular, what class of abstract rewrite systems can be proven confluent using decreasing diagrams restricted to 1 label, 2 labels, 3 labels, and so on? Surprisingly, we find that two labels suffice for proving confluence for every abstract rewrite system having the cofinality property, thus in particular for every confluent, countable system. Secondly, we show that this result stands in sharp contrast to the situation for commutation of rewrite relations, where the hierarchy does not collapse. Thirdly, investigating the possibility of a confluence hierarchy, we determine the first-order (non-)definability of the notion of confluence and related properties, using techniques from finite model theory. We find that in particular Hanf's theorem is fruitful for elegant proofs of undefinability of properties of abstract rewrite systems.