SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ruijing Lu

Publications and source records attributed to Ruijing Lu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Tight $L_{\rm p, iso}-E'_{\rm p}-\Gamma_0$ Correlation of Gamma-Ray Bursts

We select a sample of 34 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) whose $\Gamma_0$ values are derived with the onset peaks observed in the afterglow lightcurves (except for GRB 060218 whose $\Gamma_0$ is estimated with its radio data), and investigate the correlations among $\Gamma_0$, the isotropic peak luminosity ($L_{\rm iso}$), and the peak energy ($E_{\rm p,z}$) of the $\nu f_\nu$ spectrum in the cosmological rest frame. An analysis of pair correlations among these observables well confirms the results reported by the previous papers. More interestingly, a tight correlation among $L_{\rm iso}$, $E_{\rm p,z}$, and $\Gamma_0$ is found from a multiple regression analysis, which takes the form of $L_{\rm iso} \propto E_{\rm p,z}^{1.34\pm 0.14} \Gamma_0^{1.32\pm 0.19}$ or $E_{\rm p,z} \propto L_{\rm iso}^{0.55\pm 0.06}\Gamma_0^{-0.50\pm 0.17}$. Nine other GRBs whose $\Gamma_0$ are derived via the pair production opacity constraint also follow such a correlation. Excluding GRB 060218, the $L_{\rm iso}-E_{\rm p,z}-\Gamma_0$ correlation is valid, and it even holds in the jet co-moving frame. However, GRB 060218 deviates the $L^{'}_{\rm iso}-E^{'}_{\rm p}$ relation of typical GRBs in the jet co-moving frame with $3\sigma$. We argue that the $L_{\rm iso} - E_{\rm p, z} - \Gamma_0$ correlation may be more physical than the $L_{\rm iso} - E_{\rm p,z}$ correlation, since physically the relationship between the observed $L_{\rm iso}$ and $E_{\rm p,z}$ not only depends on radiation physics, but also depends on the bulk motion of the jet. We explore the possible origins of this correlation and discuss its physical implications for understanding GRB jet composition and radiation mechanism.

astro-ph.HE

On the Spectral Lags of the Short Gamma-Ray Bursts

We present a detail analysis on the spectral lags of the short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and compare them with that of the long GRBs by using the CGRO/BATSE GRB Catalog. Our results are as follows. (1)The spectral lag distribution of the short GRBs is significantly different from that of the long GRBs. Excluding the statistical fluctuation effect, a proportion of ~17% of the short GRBs have a negative spectral lag, i.e., the hard photons being lag behind the soft photons. We do not find any peculiar features from their light curves to distinguish these bursts from those with a positive spectral lag. We argue that a more physical mechanism dominated the hard lag may be hid behind the morphological features of the light curves. This should be a great challenge to the current GRB models. We notice that this proportion is consistent with the proportion of short GRBs correlated with nearby galaxies newly discovered by Tanvir et al., although it is unclear if these short GRBs are indeed associated with the sources originated at low redshift. (2)While the spectral lags of the long GRBs are strongly correlated with the pulse durations, they are not for the short GRBs. However, the ratios of the spectral lag to the pulse duration for the short and long GRBs normally distributed at 0.023 and 0.046, respectively, with the sample width, indicating that the curvature effect alone could not explain the difference of the spectral lags between the two types of GRBs. The hydrodynamic timescales of the outflows and the radiative processes at work in GRBs might also play an important role as suggested by Daigne and Mochkovitch.

astro-ph