arXiv subjects

Runbang Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Runbang Wang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ImmersiveFlow: Stereo-to-7.1.4 spatial audio generation with flow matching

Immersive spatial audio has become increasingly critical for applications ranging from AR/VR to home entertainment and automotive sound systems. However, existing generative methods remain constrained to low-dimensional formats such as binaural audio and First-Order Ambisonics (FOA). Binaural rendering is inherently limited to headphone playback, while FOA suffers from spatial aliasing and insufficient resolution for high-frequency. To overcome these limitations, we introduce ImmersiveFlow, the first end-to-end generative framework that directly synthesizes discrete 7.1.4 format spatial audio from stereo input. ImmersiveFlow leverages Flow Matching to learn trajectories from stereo inputs to multichannel spatial features within a pretrained VAE latent space. At inference, the Flow Matching model predicted latent features are decoded by the VAE and converted into the final 7.1.4 waveform. Comprehensive objective and subjective evaluations demonstrate that our method produces perceptually rich sound fields and enhanced spatial impression, significantly outperforming traditional upmixing techniques.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

SAID: Semantic Acoustic Imaging Detector for Sound Event Localization and Detection

In daily life, people hear speech, footsteps, and music around them. We can often recognize these sounds and judge where they come from. Each sound source can be shown on a separate acoustic map, a rectangular image covering $360^{\circ}$ horizontally and $180^{\circ}$ vertically. The map shows the directions occupied by the source as a region and the sound energy within that region. A class label identifies the sound. Predicting these labeled acoustic maps from audio is called semantic acoustic imaging. Such maps could help robots perceive their surroundings and allow augmented reality displays to show sound regions and classes over the real world. Existing models can recognize sound classes and estimate a direction for each source. However, a direction alone does not describe the source region or its energy. Acoustic imaging must also distinguish sound sources in nearby directions, while the number of active sources and the regions they occupy can change over time. We therefore propose the Semantic Acoustic Imaging Detector (SAID), which predicts a separate labeled acoustic map for each active source from audio. First, we pretrain Audio2Sph, SAID's audio encoder, through sound energy estimation across directions without class labels. Then, we train the complete SAID model to predict source regions, energy, and classes together. We also develop a pipeline that generates simulated recordings for pretraining and supports fine-tuning on real recordings. On the official DCASE2026 Task 3 Track A evaluation set, our submitted system ranks first with 0.1080 macro-averaged mean average precision (Macro mAP) and 0.3962 Macro Pearson $r$. Demos and code are provided at https://github.com/IN03X/SAID.

eess.AS↗

arXiv2026

Summary of DCASE 2026 Task 5: Audio-Dependent Question Answering

DCASE~2026 Task~5 introduces Audio-Dependent Question Answering (ADQA), which tests whether large audio-language models answer from the audio rather than from textual priors. An Audio-Dependency Filtering (ADF) pipeline combines silent-audio probing, per-option perplexity, a large language model (LLM) commonsense check, and human review to remove items solvable from text alone. The 3000 items that pass form the ADQA-Bench evaluation set, spanning music, speech, and environmental audio. The inaugural edition draws 14 teams and 36 submissions across two tracks defined by total parameter count (up to 100B and under 10B). A Chung-Ang University ensemble of MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking and Qwen3-Omni-30B reaches the top overall accuracy at \pct{58.33}, and a MOSS-only configuration from the same team leads the sub-10B track at \pct{57.30}. Across the 30 submissions with a comparable development score, evaluation accuracy falls by 11.91 percentage points (pp) on average (median 10.91\,pp) on the hidden evaluation split, which is designed to be harder than the development split. The most common building blocks are: the MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking backbone (13 of 36 submissions), Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on AudioMCQ-StrongAC, and preference or reinforcement-learning objectives -- Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) in five teams, Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO) in two. At test time, prompt engineering is near-universal, and majority or choice-permutation voting is common. Every system misses the same set of 233 evaluation items.

eess.AS↗