arXiv subjects

Rune Christiansen

Publications and source records attributed to Rune Christiansen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2022

Towards Causal Inference for Spatio-Temporal Data: Conflict and Forest Loss in Colombia

In many data scientific problems, we are interested in inferring causal relationships in the data generating mechanism. Here, we consider the following real-world question: how has the Colombian conflict influenced tropical forest loss? There is evidence for both enhancing and reducing impacts. Answering such questions requires the use of causal models. In this work, we propose a class of causal models for spatio-temporal stochastic processes. It allows us to formally define and quantify the causal effect of a vector of covariates $X$ on a real-valued response $Y$, even if the causal background knowledge is incomplete. We introduce a procedure for estimating causal effects, and a non-parametric hypothesis test for these effects being zero. The proposed methods do not make strong distributional assumptions, and allow for arbitrarily many latent confounders, given that these confounders do not vary across time (or, alternatively, they do not vary across space). When applying our causal methodology to the problem of conflict and forest loss, using data from 2000 to 2018, we find a reducing but insignificant causal effect of conflict on forest loss. Regionally, both enhancing and reducing effects can be identified. Our theoretical findings are supported by simulations, and code is available online.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

A causal framework for distribution generalization

We consider the problem of predicting a response $Y$ from a set of covariates $X$ when test and training distributions differ. Since such differences may have causal explanations, we consider test distributions that emerge from interventions in a structural causal model, and focus on minimizing the worst-case risk. Causal regression models, which regress the response on its direct causes, remain unchanged under arbitrary interventions on the covariates, but they are not always optimal in the above sense. For example, for linear models and bounded interventions, alternative solutions have been shown to be minimax prediction optimal. We introduce the formal framework of distribution generalization that allows us to analyze the above problem in partially observed nonlinear models for both direct interventions on $X$ and interventions that occur indirectly via exogenous variables $A$. It takes into account that, in practice, minimax solutions need to be identified from data. Our framework allows us to characterize under which class of interventions the causal function is minimax optimal. We prove sufficient conditions for distribution generalization and present corresponding impossibility results. We propose a practical method, NILE, that achieves distribution generalization in a nonlinear IV setting with linear extrapolation. We prove consistency and present empirical results.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Switching Regression Models and Causal Inference in the Presence of Discrete Latent Variables

Given a response $Y$ and a vector $X = (X^1, \dots, X^d)$ of $d$ predictors, we investigate the problem of inferring direct causes of $Y$ among the vector $X$. Models for $Y$ that use all of its causal covariates as predictors enjoy the property of being invariant across different environments or interventional settings. Given data from such environments, this property has been exploited for causal discovery. Here, we extend this inference principle to situations in which some (discrete-valued) direct causes of $ Y $ are unobserved. Such cases naturally give rise to switching regression models. We provide sufficient conditions for the existence, consistency and asymptotic normality of the MLE in linear switching regression models with Gaussian noise, and construct a test for the equality of such models. These results allow us to prove that the proposed causal discovery method obtains asymptotic false discovery control under mild conditions. We provide an algorithm, make available code, and test our method on simulated data. It is robust against model violations and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches. We further apply our method to a real data set, where we show that it does not only output causal predictors, but also a process-based clustering of data points, which could be of additional interest to practitioners.

math.ST↗