SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Rupsa Bhattacharjee

Publications and source records attributed to Rupsa Bhattacharjee.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical utility of foundation models in musculoskeletal MRI for biomarker fidelity and predictive outcomes

Precision medicine in musculoskeletal imaging requires scalable measurement infrastructure. We developed a modular system that converts routine MRI into standardized quantitative biomarkers suitable for clinical decision support. Promptable foundation segmenters (SAM, SAM2, MedSAM) were fine-tuned across heterogeneous musculoskeletal datasets and coupled to automated detection for fully automatic prompting. Fine-tuned segmentations yielded clinically reliable measurements with high concordance to expert annotations across cartilage, bone, and soft tissue biomarkers. Using the same measurements, we demonstrate two applications: (i) a three-stage knee triage cascade that reduces verification workload while maintaining sensitivity, and (ii) 48-month landmark models that forecast knee replacement and incident osteoarthritis with favorable calibration and net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Our model-agnostic, open-source architecture enables independent validation and development. This work validates a pathway from automated measurement to clinical decision: reliable biomarkers drive both workload optimization today and patient risk stratification tomorrow, and the developed framework shows how foundation models can be operationalized within precision medicine systems.

eess.IV

Technical Note: Feasibility of translating 3.0T-trained Deep-Learning Segmentation Models Out-of-the-Box on Low-Field MRI 0.55T Knee-MRI of Healthy Controls

In the current study, our purpose is to evaluate the feasibility of applying deep learning (DL) enabled algorithms to quantify bilateral knee biomarkers in healthy controls scanned at 0.55T and compared with 3.0T. The current study assesses the performance of standard in-practice bone, and cartilage segmentation algorithms at 0.55T, both qualitatively and quantitatively, in terms of comparing segmentation performance, areas of improvement, and compartment-wise cartilage thickness values between 0.55T vs. 3.0T. Initial results demonstrate a usable to good technical feasibility of translating existing quantitative deep-learning-based image segmentation techniques, trained on 3.0T, out of 0.55T for knee MRI, in a multi-vendor acquisition environment. Especially in terms of segmenting cartilage compartments, the models perform almost equivalent to 3.0T in terms of Likert ranking. The 0.55T low-field sustainable and easy-to-install MRI, as demonstrated, thus, can be utilized for evaluating knee cartilage thickness and bone segmentations aided by established DL algorithms trained at higher-field strengths out-of-the-box initially. This could be utilized at the far-spread point-of-care locations with a lack of radiologists available to manually segment low-field images, at least till a decent base of low-field data pool is collated. With further fine-tuning with manual labeling of low-field data or utilizing synthesized higher SNR images from low-field images, OA biomarker quantification performance is potentially guaranteed to be further improved.

cs.CV