arXiv subjects

Rushil Dandamudi

Publications and source records attributed to Rushil Dandamudi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Quantum Simulations of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Model Using Large Tensor Networks

As quantum computing matures, it is critical to benchmark its real-world problem solving performance against competitive classical methods, such as tensor networks. In this work, we leverage the Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG) algorithm to compute ground state energies of the Lipkin Meshkov Glick (LMG) model as a comparative benchmark against popular noisy intermediate-scale (NISQ) algorithms like the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) method. By running DMRG on the NERSC Perlmutter supercomputer, we provide one of the largest LMG ground state energy datasets in literature, containing accurate ground state energies for systems up to 1400 particles. We compare these results with VQE and SQD implementations on an IBM Eagle quantum computer for comparison. VQE achieved results within 1 percent error for 6 particles, while exceeding that threshold for all other values while SQD extended that range to 17 particles, suggesting that in a noisy intermediate scale quantum era, subspace-based approaches may strike the best balance between accuracy, circuit depth, and noise resilience.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Effort-aware Fairness: Incorporating a Philosophy-informed, Human-centered Notion of Effort into Algorithmic Fairness Metrics

Although popularized AI fairness metrics, e.g., demographic parity, have uncovered bias in AI-assisted decision-making outcomes, they do not consider how much effort one has spent to get to where one is today in the input feature space. However, the notion of effort is important in how Philosophy and humans understand fairness. We propose a philosophy-informed approach to conceptualize and evaluate Effort-aware Fairness (EaF), grounded in the concept of Force, which represents the temporal trajectory of predictive features coupled with inertia. Besides theoretical formulation, our empirical contributions include: (1) a pre-registered human subjects experiment, which shows that for both stages of the (individual) fairness evaluation process, people consider the temporal trajectory of a predictive feature more than its aggregate value; (2) pipelines to compute Effort-aware Individual/Group Fairness in the criminal justice and personal finance contexts. Our work may enable AI model auditors to uncover and potentially correct unfair decisions against individuals who have spent significant efforts to improve but are still stuck with systemic disadvantages outside their control.

cs.AI↗