SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Russell Cohen Hoffing

Publications and source records attributed to Russell Cohen Hoffing.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

IRIS: Intent Resolution via Inference-time Saccades for Open-Ended VQA in Large Vision-Language Models

We introduce IRIS (Intent Resolution via Inference-time Saccades), a novel training-free approach that uses eye-tracking data in real-time to resolve ambiguity in open-ended VQA. Through a comprehensive user study with 500 unique image-question pairs, we demonstrate that fixations closest to the time participants start verbally asking their questions are the most informative for disambiguation in Large VLMs, more than doubling the accuracy of responses on ambiguous questions (from 35.2% to 77.2%) while maintaining performance on unambiguous queries. We evaluate our approach across state-of-the-art VLMs, showing consistent improvements when gaze data is incorporated in ambiguous image-question pairs, regardless of architectural differences. We release a new benchmark dataset to use eye movement data for disambiguated VQA, a novel real-time interactive protocol, and an evaluation suite.

cs.CV

Mapping Eye Vergence Angle to the Depth of Real and Virtual Objects as an Objective Measure of Depth Perception

Recently, extended reality (XR) displays including augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have integrated eye tracking capabilities, which could enable novel ways of interacting with XR content. The vergence angle of the eyes constantly changes according to the distance of fixated objects. Here we measured vergence angle for eye fixations on real and simulated target objects in three different environments: real objects in the real-world (real), virtual objects in the real-world (AR), and virtual objects in the virtual world (VR) using gaze data from an eye-tracking device. In a repeated-measures design with 13 participants, Gaze-measured Vergence Angle (GVA) was measured while participants fixated on targets at varying distances. As expected, results showed a significant main effect of target depth such that increasing GVA was associated with closer targets. However, there were consistent individual differences in baseline GVA. When these individual differences were controlled for, there was a small but statistically-significant main effect of environment (real, AR, VR). Importantly, GVA was stable with respect to the starting depth of previously fixated targets and invariant to directionality (convergence vs. divergence). In addition, GVA proved to be a more veridical depth estimate than subjective depth judgements.

cs.HC