arXiv subjects

Russell Miller

Publications and source records attributed to Russell Miller.

36 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2018

The Hilbert's-Tenth-Problem Operator

For a ring $R$, Hilbert's Tenth Problem $HTP(R)$ is the set of polynomial equations over $R$, in several variables, with solutions in $R$. We view $HTP$ as an operator, mapping each set $W$ of prime numbers to $HTP(\mathbb Z[W^{-1}])$, which is naturally viewed as a set of polynomials in $\mathbb Z[X_1,X_2,\ldots]$. For $W=\emptyset$, it is a famous result of Matiyasevich, Davis, Putnam, and Robinson that the jump $\emptyset~\!'$ is Turing-equivalent to $HTP(\mathbb Z)$. More generally, $HTP(\mathbb Z[W^{-1}])$ is always Turing-reducible to $W'$, but not necessarily equivalent. We show here that the situation with $W=\emptyset$ is anomalous: for almost all $W$, the jump $W'$ is not diophantine in $\mathbb Z[W^{-1}]$. We also show that the $HTP$ operator does not preserve Turing equivalence: even for complementary sets $U$ and $\overline{U}$, $HTP(\mathbb Z[U^{-1}])$ and $HTP(\mathbb Z[\overline{U}^{-1}])$ can differ by a full jump. Strikingly, reversals are also possible, with $V<_T W$ but $HTP(\mathbb Z[W^{-1}]) <_T HTP(\mathbb Z[V^{-1}])$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2016

On computable field embeddings and difference closed fields

We investigate when a computable automorphism of a computable field can be effectively extended to a computable automorphism of its (computable) algebraic closure. We then apply our results and techniques to study effective embeddings of computable difference fields into computable difference closed fields.

math.LO↗

arXiv2016

Borel Functors and Infinitary Interpretations

We introduce the notion of infinitary interpretation of structures. In general, an interpretation between structures induces a continuous homomorphism between their automorphism groups, and furthermore, it induces a functor between the categories of copies of each structure. We show that for the case of infinitary interpretation the reversals are also true: Every Baire-measurable homomorphism between the automorphism groups of two countable structures is induced by an infinitary interpretation, and every Baire-measurable functor between the set of copies of two countable structures is induced by an infinitary interpretation. Furthermore, we show the complexities are maintained in the sense that if the functor is $\mathbfΔ^0_α$, then the interpretation that induces it is $Δ^{\mathtt{in}}_α$ up to $\mathbfΔ^0_α$ equivalence.

math.LO↗

arXiv2016

Baire category theory and Hilbert's Tenth Problem inside $\mathbb{Q}$

For a ring R, Hilbert's Tenth Problem HTP(R) is the set of polynomial equations over R, in several variables, with solutions in R. We consider computability of this set for subrings R of the rationals. Applying Baire category theory to these subrings, which naturally form a topological space, relates their sets HTP(R) to the set HTP($\mathbb{Q}$), whose decidability remains an open question. The main result is that, for an arbitrary set C, HTP($\mathbb{Q}$) computes C if and only if the subrings R for which HTP(R) computes C form a nonmeager class. Similar results hold for 1-reducibility, for admitting a Diophantine model of $\mathbb{Z}$, and for existential definability of $\mathbb{Z}$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2016

As Easy as $\mathbb Q$: Hilbert's Tenth Problem for Subrings of the Rationals and Number Fields

Hilbert's Tenth Problem over the field $\mathbb Q$ of rational numbers is one of the biggest open problems in the area of undecidability in number theory. In this paper we construct new, computably presentable subrings $R$ of $\mathbb Q$ having the property that Hilbert's Tenth Problem for $R$, denoted $HTP(R)$, is Turing equivalent to $HTP(\mathbb Q)$. We are able to put several additional constraints on the rings $R$ that we construct. Given any computable nonnegative real number $r \leq 1$ we construct such a ring $R = Z[\frac1p : p \in S]$ with $S$ a set of primes of lower density $r$. We also construct examples of rings $R$ for which deciding membership in $R$ is Turing equivalent to deciding $HTP(R)$ and also equivalent to deciding $HTP(\mathbb Q)$. Alternatively, we can make $HTP(R)$ have arbitrary computably enumerable degree above $HTP(\mathbb Q)$. Finally, we show that the same can be done for subrings of number fields and their prime ideals.

math.NT↗

arXiv2015

A Computable Functor From Graphs to Fields

We construct a fully faithful functor from the category of graphs to the category of fields. Using this functor, we resolve a longstanding open problem in computable model theory, by showing that for every nontrivial countable structure S, there exists a countable field F with the same essential computable-model-theoretic properties as S. Along the way, we develop a new "computable category theory," and prove that our functor and its partially-defined inverse (restricted to the categories of countable graphs and countable fields) are computable functors.

math.LO↗

arXiv2015

Finitary reducibility on equivalence relations

We introduce the notion of finitary computable reducibility on equivalence relations on the natural numbers. This is a weakening of the usual notion of computable reducibility, and we show it to be distinct in several ways. In particular, whereas no equivalence relation can be $Π_{n+2}$-complete under computable reducibility, we show that, for every $n$, there does exist a natural equivalence relation which is $Π_{n+2}$-complete under finitary reducibility. We also show that our hierarchy of finitary reducibilities does not collapse, and illustrate how it sharpens certain known results. Along the way, we present several new results which use computable reducibility to establish the complexity of various naturally defined equivalence relations in the arithmetical hierarchy.

math.LO↗

arXiv2015

Computable functors and effective interpretability

Our main result is the equivalence of two notions of reducibility between structures. One is a syntactical notion which is an effective version of interpretability as in model theory, and the other one is a computational notion which is a strengthening of the well-known Medvedev reducibility. We extend our result to effective bi-interpretability and also to effective reductions between classes of structures.

math.LO↗

arXiv2014

Categoricity Properties for Computable Algebraic Fields

We examine categoricity issues for computable algebraic fields. We give a structural criterion for relative computable categoricity of these fields, and use it to construct a field that is computably categorical, but not relatively computably categorical. Finally, we show that computable categoricity for this class of fields is $Π^0_4$-complete.

math.LO↗

arXiv2014

Computing Constraint Sets for Differential Fields

Kronecker's Theorem and Rabin's Theorem are fundamental results about computable fields F and the decidability of the set of irreducible polynomials over F. We adapt these theorems to the setting of differential fields K, with constrained pairs of differential polynomials over K assuming the role of the irreducible polynomials. We prove that two of the three basic aspects of Kronecker's Theorem remain true here, and that the reducibility in one direction (but not the other) from Rabin's Theorem also continues to hold.

math.AC↗

arXiv2013

Complexity of equivalence relations and preorders from computability theory

We study the relative complexity of equivalence relations and preorders from computability theory and complexity theory. Given binary relations $R, S$, a componentwise reducibility is defined by $ R\le S \iff \ex f \, \forall x, y \, [xRy \lra f(x) Sf(y)]. $ Here $f$ is taken from a suitable class of effective functions. For us the relations will be on natural numbers, and $f$ must be computable. We show that there is a $Π_1$-complete equivalence relation, but no $Πk$-complete for $k \ge 2$. We show that $Σk$ preorders arising naturally in the above-mentioned areas are $Σk$-complete. This includes polynomial time $m$-reducibility on exponential time sets, which is $Σ2$, almost inclusion on r.e.\ sets, which is $Σ3$, and Turing reducibility on r.e.\ sets, which is $Σ4$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2012

Computably Categorical Fields via Fermat's Last Theorem

We construct a computable, computably categorical field of infinite transcendence degree over the rational numbers, using the Fermat polynomials and assorted results from algebraic geometry. We also show that this field has an intrinsically computable (infinite) transcendence basis.

math.LO↗

arXiv2012

The hierarchy of equivalence relations on the natural numbers under computable reducibility

The notion of computable reducibility between equivalence relations on the natural numbers provides a natural computable analogue of Borel reducibility. We investigate the computable reducibility hierarchy, comparing and contrasting it with the Borel reducibility hierarchy from descriptive set theory. Meanwhile, the notion of computable reducibility appears well suited for an analysis of equivalence relations on the c.e.\ sets, and more specifically, on various classes of c.e.\ structures. This is a rich context with many natural examples, such as the isomorphism relation on c.e.\ graphs or on computably presented groups. Here, our exposition extends earlier work in the literature concerning the classification of computable structures. An abundance of open questions remains.

math.LO↗

arXiv2011

The Distance Function on a Computable Graph

We apply the techniques of computable model theory to the distance function of a graph. This task leads us to adapt the definitions of several truth-table reducibilities so that they apply to functions as well as to sets, and we prove assorted theorems about the new reducibilities and about functions which have nonincreasing computable approximations. Finally, we show that the spectrum of the distance function can consist of an arbitrary single btt-degree which is approximable from above, or of all such btt-degrees at once, or of the bT-degrees of exactly those functions approximable from above in at most n steps.

math.LO↗

arXiv2011

Computable Categoricity for Algebraic Fields with Splitting Algorithms

A computably presented algebraic field $F$ has a \emph{splitting algorithm} if it is decidable which polynomials in $F[X]$ are irreducible there. We prove that such a field is computably categorical iff it is decidable which pairs of elements of $F$ belong to the same orbit under automorphisms. We also show that this criterion is equivalent to the relative computable categoricity of $F$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2011

Noncomputable functions in the Blum-Shub-Smale model

Working in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation on the real numbers, we answer several questions of Meer and Ziegler. First, we show that, for each natural number d, an oracle for the set of algebraic real numbers of degree at most d is insufficient to allow an oracle BSS-machine to decide membership in the set of algebraic numbers of degree d + 1. We add a number of further results on relative computability of these sets and their unions. Then we show that the halting problem for BSS-computation is not decidable below any countable oracle set, and give a more specific condition, related to the cardinalities of the sets, necessary for relative BSS-computability. Most of our results involve the technique of using as input a tuple of real numbers which is algebraically independent over both the parameters and the oracle of the machine.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2010

The Cardinality of an Oracle in Blum-Shub-Smale Computation

We examine the relation of BSS-reducibility on subsets of the real numbers. The question was asked recently (and anonymously) whether it is possible for the halting problem H in BSS-computation to be BSS-reducible to a countable set. Intuitively, it seems that a countable set ought not to contain enough information to decide membership in a reasonably complex (uncountable) set such as H. We confirm this intuition, and prove a more general theorem linking the cardinality of the oracle set to the cardinality, in a local sense, of the set which it computes. We also mention other recent results on BSS-computation and algebraic real numbers.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2006

Infinite time computable model theory

We introduce infinite time computable model theory, the computable model theory arising with infinite time Turing machines, which provide infinitary notions of computability for structures built on the reals R. Much of the finite time theory generalizes to the infinite time context, but several fundamental questions, including the infinite time computable analogue of the Completeness Theorem, turn out to be independent of ZFC.

math.LO↗