arXiv subjects

Ryan Camilleri

Publications and source records attributed to Ryan Camilleri.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Supernovae Unite: Combining Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR

We present the Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints resulting from the combination of the Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR supernova (SN) samples, which we refer to as Unite. Unite updates Pantheon+, including methodology improvements that the DES sample enabled, and adds the new SN from the DES survey. This represents the most comprehensive and internally consistent SN Ia dataset available, consisting of 2884 likely type Ia supernovae. This work features consistent SN Ia modelling, sample selection, and bias corrections. We also redetermine host-galaxy stellar masses for over 98% of the sample using a consistent framework. Using Unite alone, for a flat universe with a cosmological constant (Flat-$\Lambda$CDM), we find $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.310^{+0.012}_{-0.011}$. We further present constraints using the Unite sample combined with Cosmic Microwave Background and both DES and DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data. We find strong evidence of tension between CMB measurements and the combined BAO and supernova datasets when fitting a model with constant dark energy equation of state ($w$), which is alleviated when allowing $w$ to vary with time. For a flat universe with dark energy that has a time-evolving equation of state parametrized by $w_0$ and $w_a$ we find $(\Omega_{\rm m},w_0,w_a) = (0.305\pm0.004,-0.861^{+0.044}_{-0.042},-0.60^{+0.17}_{-0.19})$ with a dark energy Figure of Merit of 315. This corresponds to a $\sim30\%$ reduction in the area of the $w_0-w_a$ confidence region relative to previous constraints from the combination of DES Y6, DESI-DR2, and CMB data (arXiv:2605.27221). The Bayesian evidence indicates only weak preference for time evolving dark energy, whereas frequentist analyses yield a preference over Flat-$\Lambda$CDM at a significance of $3.3\sigma$ ($3.1\sigma$) when using the maximum $\textit{a posteriori}$ probability (maximum likelihood).

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

Brightest Cluster Galaxy ellipticity as proxy for halo shape: Orientation bias, assembly bias, and potential selection effects in SZ-selected clusters

The orientation of triaxial galaxy clusters with respect to the line-of-sight is expected to be one of the prime sources of scatter and potential bias in optical observables (e.g., richness and weak-lensing signal) of galaxy clusters. In this work, we use the observed shape of the central Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG) as proxy for the orientation along the line-of-sight for clusters selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) surveys, matched to optically selected clusters from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES). We construct two samples of clusters that are designed to be identical in SZ mass estimate and redshift but with the roundest vs. the most elliptical BCGs, which we expect to correspond to BCGs (and clusters) with major axes aligned along the line-of-sight vs. in the plane of the sky, respectively. We find that the optical richness of round-BCG clusters is $\sim 10$\% larger than that of elliptical-BCG clusters, in agreement with the expectation from projection effects and presenting the first such detection in data. The density profiles, however, are not in agreement with the expectation from projection effects: the 1-halo term (below $6~h^{-1}\rm{Mpc}$) of both the weak-lensing and galaxy density profiles are the same for the subsamples, contrary to previous studies based on X-ray selected clusters. In the 2-halo regime (above $6~h^{-1}\rm{Mpc}$), we find a significant excess of the elliptical-BCG cluster profiles compared to the round-BCG cluster profiles, which is the opposite of the expectation from numerical simulations. We hypothesize that the intrinsic shape of the BCG reflects not just the orientation angle, but also intrinsic properties of the cluster which can affect both the SZ signal and the amplitude of the 2-halo term.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2025

A novel approach to cosmological non-linearities as an effective fluid

We propose a two parameters extension of the flat $Λ$CDM model to capture the impact of matter inhomogeneities on our cosmological inference. Non virialized but non-linearly evolving overdense and underdense regions, whose abundance is quantified using the Press-Schechter formalism, are collectively described by two effective perfect fluids $ρ_{\rm{c}},ρ_{\rm{v}}$ with non vanishing equation of state parameters $w_{\rm{c,v}}\neq 0$. These fluids are coupled to the pressureless dust, akin to an interacting DM-DE scenario. The resulting phenomenology is very rich, and could potentially address a number of inconsistencies of the standard model, including a simultaneous resolution of the Hubble and $σ_8$ tensions. To assess the viability of the model, we set initial conditions compatible to the Planck 2018 best fit $Λ$CDM cosmology and fit its additional parameters using SN~Ia observations from DESY5, BAO distances from DESI DR2 and a sample of uncorrelated $fσ_8$ measurements. Our findings show that backreaction effects from the cosmic web could restore the concordance between early and late Universe cosmological probes.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

Constraints on compact objects from the Dark Energy Survey five-year supernova sample

Gravitational lensing magnification of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) allows information to be obtained about the distribution of matter on small scales. In this paper, we derive limits on the fraction $α$ of the total matter density in compact objects (which comprise stars, stellar remnants, small stellar groupings and primordial black holes) of mass $M > 0.03 M_{\odot}$ over cosmological distances. Using 1,532 SNe Ia from the Dark Energy Survey Year 5 sample (DES-SN5YR) combined with a Bayesian prior for the absolute magnitude $M$, we obtain $α< 0.12$ at the 95\% confidence level after marginalisation over cosmological parameters, lensing due to large-scale structure, and intrinsic non-Gaussianity. Similar results are obtained using priors from the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations and galaxy weak lensing, indicating our results do not depend on the background cosmology. We argue our constraints are likely to be conservative (in the sense of the values we quote being higher than the truth), but discuss scenarios in which they could be weakened by systematics of the order of $Δα\sim 0.04$

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2024

WiFeS observations of nearby southern Type Ia supernova host galaxies

We present high-resolution observations of nearby ($z\lesssim 0.1$) galaxies that have hosted Type Ia supernovae to measure systemic spectroscopic redshifts using the Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS) instrument on the Australian National University 2.3 m telescope at Siding Spring Observatory. While most of the galaxies targeted have previous spectroscopic redshifts, we provide demonstrably more accurate and precise redshifts with competitive uncertainties, motivated by potential systematic errors that could bias estimates of the Hubble constant ($H_0$). The WiFeS instrument is remarkably stable; after calibration, the wavelength solution varies by $\lesssim 0.5$ Å in red and blue with no evidence of a trend over the course of several years. By virtue of the $25\times 38$ arcsec field of view, we are always able to redshift the galactic core, or the entire galaxy in the cases where its angular extent is smaller than the field of view, reducing any errors due to galaxy rotation. We observed 185 southern SN Ia host galaxies and redshifted each via at least one spatial region of a) the core, and b) the average over the full-field/entire galaxy. Overall, we find stochastic differences between historical redshifts and our measured redshifts on the order of $\lesssim 10^{-3}$ with a mean offset of $4.3\times 10^{-5}$, and normalised median absolute deviation of $1.2\times 10^{-4}$. We show that a systematic redshift offset at this level is not enough to bias cosmology, as $H_0$ shifts by $+0.1$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ when we replace Pantheon+ redshifts with our own, but the occasional large differences are interesting to note.

astro-ph.CO↗