SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

S. Shukla

Publications and source records attributed to S. Shukla.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Nuclear structure properties of $^{184-194}$Pb isotopes and isomers

In the present work, we study nuclear structure properties of the $^{184-194}$Pb isotopes within the framework of the nuclear shell-model. We have performed shell-model calculations using KHH7B and KHHE interactions. We have reported results for energy spectra, electromagnetic properties such as quadrupole moment ($Q$), magnetic moment ($\mu$), $B(E2)$, and $B(M1)$ transition strengths, and compared the shell-model results with the available experimental data. The shell-model results for the half-lives and seniority quantum numbers ($v$) are also reported for the isomeric states.

nucl-th

Phase stability of cation-doped LiMnO$_{2}$]{Phase stability of cation-doped LiMnO$_{2}$ within the GGA+U approximation

First principles density functional theory calculations within the GGA+U approximation were performed for LiMn$_{1-x}$M$_x$O$_{2}$, a candidate cathode material for lithium-ion batteries, with ($x=0.25$, M=Ni, Fe, Co, Mg), to investigate the effect of doping on the destabilization of the monoclinic structure relative to the layered rhombohedral structure. A primary motivation of this work was to determine to what extent the predictions of the electronically more realistic GGA+U treatment would differ from those obtained within the GGA. Several significant qualitative changes are found. For the pristine system in the rhombohedral structure, Mn ions show a high-spin state within GGA+U, rather than the low spin (metallic) state found in GGA. The doped rhombohedral structure is unstable within GGA+U, rather than metastable, as in GGA. In the monoclinic structure, the dopant oxidation states are the same (trivalent Fe, divalent Co, Ni) in GGA+U and GGA. Co and Ni ions show a higher spin state in GGA+U than in GGA. The divalent dopants destabilized the monoclinic structure to a greater extent than trivalent dopants within the GGA+U, as expected from previous GGA calculations. Overall, our results suggest that the relatively close agreement sometimes found between properties calculated within the GGA and GGA+U may be misleading, because the underlying electronic behaviors may be profoundly different.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci