arXiv subjects

S. W. Graham

Publications and source records attributed to S. W. Graham.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2008

Small gaps between almost primes, the parity problem, and some conjectures of Erdos on consecutive integers

In a previous paper, the authors proved that in any system of three linear forms satisfying obvious necessary local conditions, there are at least two forms that infinitely often assume $E_2$-values; i.e., values that are products of exactly two primes. We use that result to prove that there are inifinitely many integers $x$ that simultaneously satisfy $$ω(x)=ω(x+1)=4, Ω(x)=Ω(x+1)=5, \text{and} d(x)=d(x+1)=24.$$ Here, $ω(x), Ω(x), d(x)$ represent the number of prime divisors of $x$, the number of prime power divisors of $x$, and the number of divisors of $x$, respectively. We also prove similar theorems where $x+1$ is replaced by $x+b$ for an arbitrary positive integer $b$. Our results sharpen earlier work of Heath-Brown, Pinner, and Schlage-Puchta.

math.NT↗

arXiv2006

Small gaps between products of two primes

Let $q_n$ denote the $n^{th}$ number that is a product of exactly two distinct primes. We prove that $$\liminf_{n\to \infty} (q_{n+1}-q_n) \le 6.$$ This sharpens an earlier result of the authors (arXivMath NT/0506067), which had 26 in place of 6. More generally, we prove that if $ν$ is any positive integer, then $$ \liminf_{n\to \infty} (q_{n+ν}-q_n) \le C(ν) = νe^{ν-γ} (1+o(1)).$$ We also prove several other results on the representation of numbers with exactly two prime factors by linear forms.

math.NT↗

arXiv2005

Small gaps between primes or almost primes

Let $p_n$ denote the $n^{th}$ prime. Goldston, Pintz, and Yildirim recently proved that $ \liminf_{n\to \infty} \frac{(p_{n+1}-p_n)}{\log p_n} =0.$ We give an alternative proof of this result. We also prove some corresponding results for numbers with two prime factors. Let $q_n$ denote the $n^{th}$ number that is a product of exactly two distinct primes. We prove that $\liminf_{n\to \infty} (q_{n+1}-q_n) \le 26.$ If an appropriate generalization of the Elliott-Halberstam Conjecture is true, then the above bound can be improved to 6.

math.NT↗