arXiv subjects

Saad Lahrichi

Publications and source records attributed to Saad Lahrichi.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Global Building Area Estimation Products: How Accurate Are They?

Geo-spatial rasters of building footprint area are useful for a variety of tasks, such as monitoring urbanization, improving energy efficiency, and tracking greenhouse gas emissions. There are now multiple global building raster datasets, however there lacks an independent, comprehensive, and fair assessment of their accuracy. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of four major global building products: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL), Microsoft's TEMPO (TEMPO), The Global Building Atlas (GBA), and Overture. As ground truth for assessing their accuracy, we use ORBITaL-Net, a globally diverse dataset of manually labeled building footprints. To ensure fairness, we evaluate products on grids of multiple spatial resolutions, and several conventional performance metrics. Our results indicate that either GBA or TEMPO generally achieves the highest overall accuracy, depending upon the particular evaluation criteria. We also stratify the accuracy of each product by several factors: geographic location, population density, and income groups. The results reveal that product accuracy can sometimes vary significantly with respect to these factors. Notably, all products are significantly less accurate in Africa and Asia. Most products also suffer significant accuracy reduction in high-density urban areas.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Improved Wildfire Spread Prediction with Time-Series Data and the WSTS+ Benchmark

Recent research has demonstrated the potential of deep neural networks (DNNs) to accurately predict wildfire spread on a given day based upon high-dimensional explanatory data from a single preceding day, or from a time series of T preceding days. For the first time, we investigate a large number of existing data-driven wildfire modeling strategies under controlled conditions, revealing the best modeling strategies and resulting in models that achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy for both single-day and multi-day input scenarios, as evaluated on a large public benchmark for next-day wildfire spread, termed the WildfireSpreadTS (WSTS) benchmark. Consistent with prior work, we found that models using time-series input obtained the best overall accuracy, suggesting this is an important future area of research. Furthermore, we create a new benchmark, WSTS+, by incorporating four additional years of historical wildfire data into the WSTS benchmark. Our benchmark doubles the number of unique years of historical data, expands its geographic scope, and, to our knowledge, represents the largest public benchmark for time-series-based wildfire spread prediction.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Is Self-Supervised Pre-training on Satellite Imagery Better than ImageNet? A Systematic Study with Sentinel-2

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has demonstrated significant potential in pre-training robust models with limited labeled data, making it particularly valuable for remote sensing (RS) tasks. A common assumption is that pre-training on domain-aligned data provides maximal benefits on downstream tasks, particularly when compared to ImageNet-pretraining (INP). In this work, we investigate this assumption by collecting GeoNet, a large and diverse dataset of global optical Sentinel-2 imagery, and pre-training SwAV and MAE on both GeoNet and ImageNet. Evaluating these models on six downstream tasks in the few-shot setting reveals that SSL pre-training on RS data offers modest performance improvements over INP, and that it remains competitive in multiple scenarios. This indicates that the presumed benefits of SSL pre-training on RS data may be overstated, and the additional costs of data curation and pre-training could be unjustified.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

Does Deep Active Learning Work in the Wild?

Deep active learning (DAL) methods have shown significant improvements in sample efficiency compared to simple random sampling. While these studies are valuable, they nearly always assume that optimal DAL hyperparameter (HP) settings are known in advance, or optimize the HPs through repeating DAL several times with different HP settings. Here, we argue that in real-world settings, or in the wild, there is significant uncertainty regarding good HPs, and their optimization contradicts the premise of using DAL (i.e., we require labeling efficiency). In this study, we evaluate the performance of eleven modern DAL methods on eight benchmark problems as we vary a key HP shared by all methods: the pool ratio. Despite adjusting only one HP, our results indicate that eight of the eleven DAL methods sometimes underperform relative to simple random sampling and some frequently perform worse. Only three methods always outperform random sampling (albeit narrowly), and we find that these methods all utilize diversity to select samples - a relatively simple criterion. Our findings reveal the limitations of existing DAL methods when deployed in the wild, and present this as an important new open problem in the field.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Segment anything, from space?

Recently, the first foundation model developed specifically for image segmentation tasks was developed, termed the "Segment Anything Model" (SAM). SAM can segment objects in input imagery based on cheap input prompts, such as one (or more) points, a bounding box, or a mask. The authors examined the \textit{zero-shot} image segmentation accuracy of SAM on a large number of vision benchmark tasks and found that SAM usually achieved recognition accuracy similar to, or sometimes exceeding, vision models that had been trained on the target tasks. The impressive generalization of SAM for segmentation has major implications for vision researchers working on natural imagery. In this work, we examine whether SAM's performance extends to overhead imagery problems and help guide the community's response to its development. We examine SAM's performance on a set of diverse and widely studied benchmark tasks. We find that SAM does often generalize well to overhead imagery, although it fails in some cases due to the unique characteristics of overhead imagery and its common target objects. We report on these unique systematic failure cases for remote sensing imagery that may comprise useful future research for the community.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2022

A Data Science Pipeline for Algorithmic Trading: A Comparative Study of Applications for Finance and Cryptoeconomics

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have made algorithmic trading play a central role in finance. However, current research and applications are disconnected information islands. We propose a generally applicable pipeline for designing, programming, and evaluating the algorithmic trading of stock and crypto assets. Moreover, we demonstrate how our data science pipeline works with respect to four conventional algorithms: the moving average crossover, volume-weighted average price, sentiment analysis, and statistical arbitrage algorithms. Our study offers a systematic way to program, evaluate, and compare different trading strategies. Furthermore, we implement our algorithms through object-oriented programming in Python3, which serves as open-source software for future academic research and applications.

cs.HC↗