arXiv subjects

Saad Mouti

Publications and source records attributed to Saad Mouti.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Rough Volatility Across Assets

We measure volatility roughness across asset classes using a common data infrastructure and pipeline. Our data covers 3,926 United States equities, 34 CME futures roots, rates, FX, and commodities, and options on 44 underlyings over 2010-2025. Realized volatility is rough everywhere. The class-median Hurst estimate ranges from $0.05$ (livestock) through $0.07-0.10$ (rates, FX, agriculture, energy, metals) to $0.13$ (single stocks) and $0.20$ (equity indices). The option-implied measure identifies $H$ only where the leverage effect produces a clean skew term structure. For the equity indices, implied estimates of $0.21-0.28$ are just above realized volatility $H$, while for rates and FX the ATM skew regression fails with an R-squared near zero even though realized volatility remains rough. We also show a mean-reversion contamination formula for the second-moment estimator of the roughness for the stationary fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. The local slope of the increment second moment deviates from $2H$ by $(1-H)\Gamma(2H+1)(\kappa\Delta)^{2-2H}$ for all $H\in(0,1)$. A correction framework for the second moment, when the log realized volatility measure has additive noise, raised the $H$ estimate slightly but nowhere near the Brownian diffusion framework. Finally, a failure taxonomy discusses where rough-volatility methods apply and where they fail, suggesting alternative paths to further explore the rough-volatility paradigm.

q-fin.MF↗

arXiv2024

Rough volatility: evidence from range volatility estimators

In Gatheral et al. 2018, first posted in 2014, volatility is characterized by fractional behavior with a Hurst exponent $H < 0.5$, challenging traditional views of volatility dynamics. Gatheral et al. demonstrated this using realized volatility measurements. Our study extends this analysis by employing range-based proxies to confirm their findings across a broader dataset and non-standard assets. Notably, we address the concern that rough volatility might be an artifact of microstructure noise in high-frequency return data. Our results reveal that log-volatility, estimated via range-based methods, behaves akin to fractional Brownian motion with an even lower $H$, below $0.1$. We also affirm the efficacy of the rough fractional stochastic volatility model (RFSV), finding that its predictive capability surpasses that of AR, HAR, and GARCH models in most scenarios. This work substantiates the intrinsic nature of rough volatility, independent of the microstructure noise often present in high-frequency financial data.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2023

Least-Cost Structuring of 24/7 Carbon-Free Electricity Procurements

We consider the construction of renewable portfolios targeting specified carbon-free (CFE) hourly performance scores. We work in a probabilistic framework that uses a collection of simulation scenarios and imposes probability constraints on achieving the desired CFE score. In our approach there is a fixed set of available CFE generators and a given load customer who seeks to minimize annual procurement costs. We illustrate results using a realistic dataset of jointly calibrated solar and wind assets, and compare different approaches to handling multiple loads.

q-fin.PM↗

arXiv2023

Sustainable Investing and the Cross-Section of Returns and Maximum Drawdown

We use supervised learning to identify factors that predict the cross-section of returns and maximum drawdown for stocks in the US equity market. Our data run from January 1970 to December 2019 and our analysis includes ordinary least squares, penalized linear regressions, tree-based models, and neural networks. We find that the most important predictors tended to be consistent across models, and that non-linear models had better predictive power than linear models. Predictive power was higher in calm periods than in stressed periods. Environmental, social, and governance indicators marginally impacted the predictive power of non-linear models in our data, despite their negative correlation with maximum drawdown and positive correlation with returns. Upon exploring whether ESG variables are captured by some models, we find that ESG data contribute to the prediction nonetheless.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2023

A resampling approach for causal inference on novel two-point time-series with application to identify risk factors for type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease

Two-point time-series data, characterized by baseline and follow-up observations, are frequently encountered in health research. We study a novel two-point time series structure without a control group, which is driven by an observational routine clinical dataset collected to monitor key risk markers of type-$2$ diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We propose a resampling approach called 'I-Rand' for independently sampling one of the two time points for each individual and making inference on the estimated causal effects based on matching methods. The proposed method is illustrated with data from a service-based dietary intervention to promote a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD), designed to impact risk of T2D and CVD. Baseline data contain a pre-intervention health record of study participants, and health data after LCD intervention are recorded at the follow-up visit, providing a two-point time-series pattern without a parallel control group. Using this approach we find that obesity is a significant risk factor of T2D and CVD, and an LCD approach can significantly mitigate the risks of T2D and CVD. We provide code that implements our method.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2017

Rough volatility: evidence from option prices

It has been recently shown that spot volatilities can be very well modeled by rough stochastic volatility type dynamics. In such models, the log-volatility follows a fractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameter smaller than 1/2. This result has been established using high frequency volatility estimations from historical price data. We revisit this finding by studying implied volatility based approximations of the spot volatility. Using at-the-money options on the S&P500 index with short maturity, we are able to confirm that volatility is rough. The Hurst parameter found here, of order 0.3, is slightly larger than that usually obtained from historical data. This is easily explained from a smoothing effect due to the remaining time to maturity of the considered options.

q-fin.ST↗