arXiv subjects

Sabina J. Sloman

Publications and source records attributed to Sabina J. Sloman.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Epistemic Errors of Imperfect Multitask Learners When Distributions Shift

Uncertainty-aware machine learners, such as Bayesian neural networks, output a quantification of uncertainty instead of a point prediction. We provide uncertainty-aware learners with a principled framework to characterize, and identify ways to eliminate, errors that arise from reducible (epistemic) uncertainty. We introduce a principled definition of epistemic error, and provide a decompositional epistemic error bound which operates in the very general setting of imperfect multitask learning under distribution shift. In this setting, the training (source) data may arise from multiple tasks, the test (target) data may differ systematically from the source data tasks, and/or the learner may not arrive at an accurate characterization of the source data. Our bound separately attributes epistemic errors to each of multiple aspects of the learning procedure and environment. As corollaries of the general result, we provide epistemic error bounds specialized to the settings of Bayesian transfer learning and distribution shift within $ε$-neighborhoods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Representative, Informative, and De-Amplifying: Requirements for Robust Bayesian Active Learning under Model Misspecification

In many science and industry settings, a central challenge is designing experiments under time and budget constraints. Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) is a paradigm to pick maximally informative designs that has been widely applied to such problems. During training, BOED selects inputs according to a pre-determined acquisition criterion to target informativeness. During testing, the model learned during training encounters a naturally occurring distribution of test samples. This leads to an instance of covariate shift, where the train and test samples are drawn from different distributions (the training samples are not representative of the test distribution). Prior work has shown that in the presence of model misspecification, covariate shift amplifies generalization error. Our first contribution is to provide a mathematical analysis of generalization error in the presence of model misspecification, revealing that, beyond covariate shift, generalization error is also driven by a previously unidentified phenomenon we term error (de-)amplification. We then develop a new acquisition function that mitigates the effects of model misspecification by including terms for representativeness, informativeness, and de-amplification (R-IDeA). Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method performs better than methods that target only informativeness, only representativeness, or both.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

CREDO: Epistemic-Aware Conformalized Credal Envelopes for Regression

Conformal prediction delivers prediction intervals with distribution-free coverage, but its intervals can look overconfident in regions where the model is extrapolating, because standard conformal scores do not explicitly represent epistemic uncertainty. Credal methods, by contrast, make epistemic effects visible by working with sets of plausible predictive distributions, but they are typically model-based and lack calibration guarantees. We introduce CREDO, a simple "credal-then-conformalize" recipe that combines both strengths. CREDO first builds an interpretable credal envelope that widens when local evidence is weak, then applies split conformal calibration on top of this envelope to guarantee marginal coverage without further assumptions. This separation of roles yields prediction intervals that are interpretable: their width can be decomposed into aleatoric noise, epistemic inflation, and a distribution-free calibration slack. We provide a fast implementation based on trimming extreme posterior predictive endpoints, prove validity, and show on benchmark regressions that CREDO maintains target coverage while improving sparsity adaptivity at competitive efficiency.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2025

Robust Experimental Design via Generalised Bayesian Inference

Bayesian optimal experimental design is a principled framework for conducting experiments that leverages Bayesian inference to quantify how much information one can expect to gain from selecting a certain design. However, accurate Bayesian inference relies on the assumption that one's statistical model of the data-generating process is correctly specified. If this assumption is violated, Bayesian methods can lead to poor inference and estimates of information gain. Generalised Bayesian (or Gibbs) inference is a more robust probabilistic inference framework that replaces the likelihood in the Bayesian update by a suitable loss function. In this work, we present Generalised Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (GBOED), an extension of Gibbs inference to the experimental design setting which achieves robustness in both design and inference. Using an extended information-theoretic framework, we derive a new acquisition function, the Gibbs expected information gain (Gibbs EIG). Our empirical results demonstrate that GBOED enhances robustness to outliers and incorrect assumptions about the outcome noise distribution.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2025

Proxy-informed Bayesian transfer learning with unknown sources

Generalization outside the scope of one's training data requires leveraging prior knowledge about the effects that transfer, and the effects that don't, between different data sources. Transfer learning is a framework for specifying and refining this knowledge about sets of source (training) and target (prediction) data. A challenging open problem is addressing the empirical phenomenon of negative transfer, whereby the transfer learner performs worse on the target data after taking the source data into account than before. We first introduce a Bayesian perspective on negative transfer, and then a method to address it. The key insight from our formulation is that negative transfer can stem from misspecified prior information about non-transferable causes of the source data. Our proposed method, proxy-informed robust method for probabilistic transfer learning (PROMPT), does not require prior knowledge of the source data (the data sources may be "unknown"). PROMPT is thus applicable when differences between tasks are unobserved, such as in the presence of latent confounders. Moreover, the learner need not have access to observations in the target task (may not have the ability to "fine-tune"), and instead makes use of proxy (indirect) information. Our theoretical results show that the threat of negative transfer does not depend on the informativeness of the proxy information, highlighting the usefulness of PROMPT in cases where only noisy indirect information, such as human feedback, is available.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Automating the Practice of Science -- Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications

Automation transformed various aspects of our human civilization, revolutionizing industries and streamlining processes. In the domain of scientific inquiry, automated approaches emerged as powerful tools, holding promise for accelerating discovery, enhancing reproducibility, and overcoming the traditional impediments to scientific progress. This article evaluates the scope of automation within scientific practice and assesses recent approaches. Furthermore, it discusses different perspectives to the following questions: Where do the greatest opportunities lie for automation in scientific practice?; What are the current bottlenecks of automating scientific practice?; and What are significant ethical and practical consequences of automating scientific practice? By discussing the motivations behind automated science, analyzing the hurdles encountered, and examining its implications, this article invites researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to navigate the rapidly evolving frontier of automated scientific practice.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

One system for learning and remembering episodes and rules

Humans can learn individual episodes and generalizable rules and also successfully retain both kinds of acquired knowledge over time. In the cognitive science literature, (1) learning individual episodes and rules and (2) learning and remembering are often both conceptualized as competing processes that necessitate separate, complementary learning systems. Inspired by recent research in statistical learning, we challenge these trade-offs, hypothesizing that they arise from capacity limitations rather than from the inherent incompatibility of the underlying cognitive processes. Using an associative learning task, we show that one system with excess representational capacity can learn and remember both episodes and rules.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Bayesian Active Learning in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters

In many settings, such as scientific inference, optimization, and transfer learning, the learner has a well-defined objective, which can be treated as estimation of a target parameter, and no intrinsic interest in characterizing the entire data-generating process. Usually, the learner must also contend with additional sources of uncertainty or variables -- with nuisance parameters. Bayesian active learning, or sequential optimal experimental design, can straightforwardly accommodate the presence of nuisance parameters, and so is a natural active learning framework for such problems. However, the introduction of nuisance parameters can lead to bias in the Bayesian learner's estimate of the target parameters, a phenomenon we refer to as negative interference. We characterize the threat of negative interference and how it fundamentally changes the nature of the Bayesian active learner's task. We show that the extent of negative interference can be extremely large, and that accurate estimation of the nuisance parameters is critical to reducing it. The Bayesian active learner is confronted with a dilemma: whether to spend a finite acquisition budget in pursuit of estimation of the target or of the nuisance parameters. Our setting encompasses Bayesian transfer learning as a special case, and our results shed light on the phenomenon of negative transfer between learning environments.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Learning Relevant Contextual Variables Within Bayesian Optimization

Contextual Bayesian Optimization (CBO) efficiently optimizes black-box functions with respect to design variables, while simultaneously integrating contextual information regarding the environment, such as experimental conditions. However, the relevance of contextual variables is not necessarily known beforehand. Moreover, contextual variables can sometimes be optimized themselves at an additional cost, a setting overlooked by current CBO algorithms. Cost-sensitive CBO would simply include optimizable contextual variables as part of the design variables based on their cost. Instead, we adaptively select a subset of contextual variables to include in the optimization, based on the trade-off between their relevance and the additional cost incurred by optimizing them compared to leaving them to be determined by the environment. We learn the relevance of contextual variables by sensitivity analysis of the posterior surrogate model while minimizing the cost of optimization by leveraging recent developments on early stopping for BO. We empirically evaluate our proposed Sensitivity-Analysis-Driven Contextual BO (SADCBO) method against alternatives on both synthetic and real-world experiments, together with extensive ablation studies, and demonstrate a consistent improvement across examples.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Knowing what to know: Implications of the choice of prior distribution on the behavior of adaptive design optimization

Adaptive design optimization (ADO) is a state-of-the-art technique for experimental design (Cavagnaro, Myung, Pitt, & Kujala, 2010). ADO dynamically identifies stimuli that, in expectation, yield the most information about a hypothetical construct of interest (e.g., parameters of a cognitive model). To calculate this expectation, ADO leverages the modeler's existing knowledge, specified in the form of a prior distribution. Informative priors align with the distribution of the focal construct in the participant population. This alignment is assumed by ADO's internal assessment of expected information gain. If the prior is instead misinformative, i.e., does not align with the participant population, ADO's estimates of expected information gain could be inaccurate. In many cases, the true distribution that characterizes the participant population is unknown, and experimenters rely on heuristics in their choice of prior and without an understanding of how this choice affects ADO's behavior. Our work introduces a mathematical framework that facilitates investigation of the consequences of the choice of prior distribution on the efficiency of experiments designed using ADO. Through theoretical and empirical results, we show that, in the context of prior misinformation, measures of expected information gain are distinct from the correctness of the corresponding inference. Through a series of simulation experiments, we show that, in the case of parameter estimation, ADO nevertheless outperforms other design methods. Conversely, in the case of model selection, misinformative priors can lead inference to favor the wrong model, and rather than mitigating this pitfall, ADO exacerbates it.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2022

Characterizing the robustness of Bayesian adaptive experimental designs to active learning bias

Bayesian adaptive experimental design is a form of active learning, which chooses samples to maximize the information they give about uncertain parameters. Prior work has shown that other forms of active learning can suffer from active learning bias, where unrepresentative sampling leads to inconsistent parameter estimates. We show that active learning bias can also afflict Bayesian adaptive experimental design, depending on model misspecification. We analyze the case of estimating a linear model, and show that worse misspecification implies more severe active learning bias. At the same time, model classes incorporating more "noise" - i.e., specifying higher inherent variance in observations - suffer less from active learning bias. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that insights from the linear model can predict the presence and degree of active learning bias in nonlinear contexts, namely in a (simulated) preference learning experiment.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

A Comparison of Methods for Adaptive Experimentation

We use a simulation study to compare three methods for adaptive experimentation: Thompson sampling, Tempered Thompson sampling, and Exploration sampling. We gauge the performance of each in terms of social welfare and estimation accuracy, and as a function of the number of experimental waves. We further construct a set of novel "hybrid" loss measures to identify which methods are optimal for researchers pursuing a combination of experimental aims. Our main results are: 1) the relative performance of Thompson sampling depends on the number of experimental waves, 2) Tempered Thompson sampling uniquely distributes losses across multiple experimental aims, and 3) in most cases, Exploration sampling performs similarly to random assignment.

stat.ME↗