arXiv subjects

Sabine Cornelsen

Publications and source records attributed to Sabine Cornelsen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Beyond Degree Four: Near-Orthogonal Planar Drawings

Orthogonal planar drawings constitute a classical and mainstream research topic in graph drawing due to their clarity and wide applicability. In an orthogonal planar drawing of a graph, each face is represented as an orthogonal polygon, that is, a polygon whose edges are either horizontal or vertical. Yet a planar graph admits such a representation if and only if its maximum degree is at most four. In this paper, we consider planar polyline drawings of graphs with unrestricted maximum degree. We focus on drawings that are ``close to orthogonal'', where closeness is measured by the number of faces that are not orthogonal polygons. We show that, even when the input graph is triconnected and thus has a unique planar embedding, the problem of testing whether there exists a planar polyline drawing with at most $h$ non-orthogonal faces is NP-complete. Motivated by this computational hardness, we study parameterized and approximation algorithms. In the fixed-embedding setting, we prove that the problem admits linear-time FPT algorithms parameterized by (i) the outerplanarity index and (ii) the natural parameter $h$. In addition, we provide an FPT algorithm parameterized by the treewidth and a polynomial-time approximation scheme. In the variable-embedding setting, we give an FPT algorithm parameterized by treewidth for biconnected graphs.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2026

Upward-Planar Drawings with Bounded Span

We consider upward-planar layered drawings of directed graphs, i.e., crossing-free drawings in which each edge is drawn as a y-monotone curve going upward from its tail to its head, and the y-coordinates of the vertices are integers. The span of an edge in such a drawing is the absolute difference between the y-coordinates of its endpoints, and the span of the drawing is the maximum span of any edge. The span of an upward-planar graph is the minimum span over all its upward-planar drawings. We study the problem of determining the span of upward-planar graphs and provide both combinatorial and algorithmic results. On the combinatorial side, we present upper and lower bounds for the span of directed trees. On the algorithmic side, we show that the problem of determining the span of an upward-planar graph is NP-complete already for directed trees and for biconnected single-source graphs. Moreover, we give efficient algorithms for several graph families with a bounded number of sources, including st-planar graphs and graphs where the planar or upward-planar embedding is prescribed. Furthermore, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the vertex cover number and the treedepth plus the span.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2026

Grounded String Representations of Series-Parallel Graphs without Transitive Edges

In a {\em grounded string representation} of a graph there is a horizontal line $\ell$ and each vertex is represented as a simple curve below $\ell$ with one end point on $\ell$ such that two curves intersect if and only if the respective vertices are adjacent. A grounded string representation is a {\em grounded L-reverseL-representation} if each vertex is represented by a 1-bend orthogonal polyline. It is a {\em grounded L-representation} if in addition all curves are L-shaped. We show that every biconnected series-parallel graph without edges between the two vertices of a separation pair (i.e., {\em transitive edges}) admits a grounded L-reverseL-representation if and only if it admits a grounded string representation. Moreover, we can test in linear time whether such a representation exists. We also construct a biconnected series-parallel graph without transitive edges that admits a grounded L-reverseL-representation, but no grounded L-representation.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

Hypergraphs as Metro Maps: Drawing Paths with Few Bends in Trees, Cacti, and Plane 4-Graphs

A hypergraph consists of a set of vertices and a set of subsets of vertices, called hyperedges. In the metro map metaphor, each hyperedge is represented by a path (the metro line) and the union of all these paths is the support graph (metro network) of the hypergraph. Formally speaking, a path-based support is a graph together with a set of paths. We consider the problem of constructing drawings of path-based supports that (i) minimize the sum of the number of bends on all paths, (ii) minimize the maximum number of bends on any path, or (iii) maximize the number of 0-bend paths, then the number of 1-bend paths, etc. We concentrate on straight-line drawings of path-based tree and cactus supports as well as orthogonal drawings of path-based plane supports with maximum degree 4.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments

We address the problem of computing a dynamic visualization of a geometric graph $G$ as a sequence of frames. Each frame shows only a portion of the graph but their union covers $G$ entirely. The two main requirements of our dynamic visualization are: $(i)$ guaranteeing drawing stability, so to preserve the user's mental map; $(ii)$ keeping the visual complexity of each frame low. To satisfy the first requirement, we never change the position of the vertices. Regarding the second requirement, we avoid edge crossings in each frame. More precisely, in the first frame we visualize a suitable subset of non-crossing edges; in each subsequent frame, exactly one new edge enters the visualization and all the edges that cross with it are deleted. We call such a sequence of frames a planar story of $G$. Our goal is to find a planar story whose minimum number of edges contemporarily displayed is maximized (i.e., a planar story that maximizes the minimum frame size). Besides studying our model from a theoretical point of view, we also design and experimentally compare different algorithms, both exact techniques and heuristics. These algorithms provide an array of alternative trade-offs between efficiency and effectiveness, also depending on the structure of the input graph.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

Geometric realizations of dichotomous ordinal graphs

A dichotomous ordinal graph consists of an undirected graph with a partition of the edges into short and long edges. A geometric realization of a dichotomous ordinal graph $G$ in a metric space $X$ is a drawing of $G$ in $X$ in which every long edge is strictly longer than every short edge. We call a graph $G$ pandichotomous in $X$ if $G$ admits a geometric realization in $X$ for every partition of its edge set into short and long edges. We exhibit a very close relationship between the degeneracy of a graph $G$ and its pandichotomic Euclidean or spherical dimension, that is, the smallest dimension $k$ such that $G$ is pandichotomous in $\mathbb{R}^k$ or the sphere $\mathbb{S}^k$, respectively. First, every $d$-degenerate graph is pandichotomous in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ and $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ and these bounds are tight for the sphere and for $\mathbb{R}^2$ and almost tight for $\mathbb{R}^d$, for $d\ge 3$. Second, every $n$-vertex graph that is pandichotomous in $\mathbb{R}^k$ has at most $\mu kn$ edges, for some absolute constant $\mu<7.23$. This shows that the pandichotomic Euclidean dimension of any graph is linearly tied to its degeneracy and in the special cases $k\in \{1,2\}$ resolves open problems posed by Alam, Kobourov, Pupyrev, and Toeniskoetter. Further, we characterize which complete bipartite graphs are pandichotomous in $\mathbb{R}^2$: These are exactly the $K_{m,n}$ with $m\le 3$ or $m=4$ and $n\le 6$. For general bipartite graphs, we can guarantee realizations in $\mathbb{R}^2$ if the short or the long subgraph is constrained: namely if the short subgraph is outerplanar or a subgraph of a rectangular grid, or if the long subgraph forms a caterpillar.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

The Price of Upwardness

Not every directed acyclic graph (DAG) whose underlying undirected graph is planar admits an upward planar drawing. We are interested in pushing the notion of upward drawings beyond planarity by considering upward $k$-planar drawings of DAGs in which the edges are monotonically increasing in a common direction and every edge is crossed at most $k$ times for some integer $k \ge 1$. We show that the number of crossings per edge in a monotone drawing is in general unbounded for the class of bipartite outerplanar, cubic, or bounded pathwidth DAGs. However, it is at most two for outerpaths and it is at most quadratic in the bandwidth in general. From the computational point of view, we prove that testing upward-$k$-planarity is NP-complete already for $k=1$ and even for restricted instances for which upward planarity testing is polynomial. On the positive side, we can decide in linear time whether a single-source DAG admits an upward 1-planar drawing in which all vertices are incident to the outer face.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

The Parametrized Complexity of the Segment Number

Given a straight-line drawing of a graph, a segment is a maximal set of edges that form a line segment. Given a planar graph $G$, the segment number of $G$ is the minimum number of segments that can be achieved by any planar straight-line drawing of $G$. The line cover number of $G$ is the minimum number of lines that support all the edges of a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Computing the segment number or the line cover number of a planar graph is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete and, thus, NP-hard. We study the problem of computing the segment number from the perspective of parameterized complexity. We show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to each of the following parameters: the vertex cover number, the segment number, and the line cover number. We also consider colored versions of the segment and the line cover number.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2023

Decomposing Triangulations into 4-Connected Components

A connected graph is 4-connected if it contains at least five vertices and removing any three of them does not disconnect it. A frequent preprocessing step in graph drawing is to decompose a plane graph into its 4-connected components and to determine their nesting structure. A linear-time algorithm for this problem was already proposed by Kant. However, using common graph data structures, we found the subroutine dealing with triangulated graphs difficult to implement in such a way that it actually runs in linear time. As a drop-in replacement, we provide a different, easy-to-implement linear-time algorithm that decomposes a triangulated graph into its 4-connected components and computes the respective nesting structure. The algorithm is based on depth-first search.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Planar Confluent Orthogonal Drawings of 4-Modal Digraphs

In a planar confluent orthogonal drawing (PCOD) of a directed graph (digraph) vertices are drawn as points in the plane and edges as orthogonal polylines starting with a vertical segment and ending with a horizontal segment. Edges may overlap in their first or last segment, but must not intersect otherwise. PCODs can be seen as a directed variant of Kandinsky drawings or as planar L-drawings of subdivisions of digraphs. The maximum number of subdivision vertices in an edge is then the split complexity. A PCOD is upward if each edge is drawn with monotonically increasing y-coordinates and quasi-upward if no edge starts with decreasing y-coordinates. We study the split complexity of PCODs and (quasi-)upward PCODs for various classes of graphs.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2022

On Upward-Planar L-Drawings of Graphs

In an upward-planar L-drawing of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) each edge $e$ is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment with its lowest endpoint at the tail of $e$ and of a horizontal segment ending at the head of $e$. Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Recently, upward-planar L-drawings have been studied for $st$-graphs, i.e., planar DAGs with a single source $s$ and a single sink $t$ containing an edge directed from $s$ to $t$. It is known that a plane $st$-graph, i.e., an embedded $st$-graph in which the edge $(s,t)$ is incident to the outer face, admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it admits a bitonic $st$-ordering, which can be tested in linear time. We study upward-planar L-drawings of DAGs that are not necessarily $st$-graphs. On the combinatorial side, we show that a plane DAG admits an upward-planar L-drawing if and only if it is a subgraph of a plane $st$-graph admitting a bitonic $st$-ordering. This allows us to show that not every tree with a fixed bimodal embedding admits an upward-planar L-drawing. Moreover, we prove that any acyclic cactus with a single source (or a single sink) admits an upward-planar L-drawing, which respects a given outerplanar embedding if there are no transitive edges. On the algorithmic side, we consider DAGs with a single source (or a single sink). We give linear-time testing algorithms for these DAGs in two cases: (i) when the drawing must respect a prescribed embedding and (ii) when no restriction is given on the embedding, but it is biconnected and series-parallel.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Planar L-Drawings of Bimodal Graphs

In a planar L-drawing of a directed graph (digraph) each edge e is represented as a polyline composed of a vertical segment starting at the tail of e and a horizontal segment ending at the head of e. Distinct edges may overlap, but not cross. Our main focus is on bimodal graphs, i.e., digraphs admitting a planar embedding in which the incoming and outgoing edges around each vertex are contiguous. We show that every plane bimodal graph without 2-cycles admits a planar L-drawing. This includes the class of upward-plane graphs. Finally, outerplanar digraphs admit a planar L-drawing - although they do not always have a bimodal embedding - but not necessarily with an outerplanar embedding.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2020

Drawing Shortest Paths in Geodetic Graphs

Motivated by the fact that in a space where shortest paths are unique, no two shortest paths meet twice, we study a question posed by Greg Bodwin: Given a geodetic graph $G$, i.e., an unweighted graph in which the shortest path between any pair of vertices is unique, is there a philogeodetic drawing of $G$, i.e., a drawing of $G$ in which the curves of any two shortest paths meet at most once? We answer this question in the negative by showing the existence of geodetic graphs that require some pair of shortest paths to cross at least four times. The bound on the number of crossings is tight for the class of graphs we construct. Furthermore, we exhibit geodetic graphs of diameter two that do not admit a philogeodetic drawing.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2019

Morphing Contact Representations of Graphs

We consider the problem of morphing between contact representations of a plane graph. In an $\mathcal F$-contact representation of a plane graph $G$, vertices are realized by internally disjoint elements from a family $\mathcal F$ of connected geometric objects. Two such elements touch if and only if their corresponding vertices are adjacent. These touchings also induce the same embedding as in $G$. In a morph between two $\mathcal F$-contact representations we insist that at each time step (continuously throughout the morph) we have an $\mathcal F$-contact representation. We focus on the case when $\mathcal{F}$ is the family of triangles in $\mathbb{R}^2$ that are the lower-right half of axis-parallel rectangles. Such RT-representations exist for every plane graph and right triangles are one of the simplest families of shapes supporting this property. Thus, they provide a natural case to study regarding morphs of contact representations of plane graphs. We study piecewise linear morphs, where each step is a linear morph moving the endpoints of each triangle at constant speed along straight-line trajectories. We provide a polynomial-time algorithm that decides whether there is a piecewise linear morph between two RT-representations of an $n$-vertex plane triangulation, and, if so, computes a morph with $\mathcal O(n^2)$ linear morphs. As a direct consequence, we obtain that for $4$-connected plane triangulations there is a morph between every pair of RT-representations where the ``top-most'' triangle in both representations corresponds to the same vertex. This shows that the realization space of such RT-representations of any $4$-connected plane triangulation forms a connected set.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2018

Orthogonal and Smooth Orthogonal Layouts of 1-Planar Graphs with Low Edge Complexity

While orthogonal drawings have a long history, smooth orthogonal drawings have been introduced only recently. So far, only planar drawings or drawings with an arbitrary number of crossings per edge have been studied. Recently, a lot of research effort in graph drawing has been directed towards the study of beyond-planar graphs such as 1-planar graphs, which admit a drawing where each edge is crossed at most once. In this paper, we consider graphs with a fixed embedding. For 1-planar graphs, we present algorithms that yield orthogonal drawings with optimal curve complexity and smooth orthogonal drawings with small curve complexity. For the subclass of outer-1-planar graphs, which can be drawn such that all vertices lie on the outer face, we achieve optimal curve complexity for both, orthogonal and smooth orthogonal drawings.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

Planar L-Drawings of Directed Graphs

We study planar drawings of directed graphs in the L-drawing standard. We provide necessary conditions for the existence of these drawings and show that testing for the existence of a planar L-drawing is an NP-complete problem. Motivated by this result, we focus on upward-planar L-drawings. We show that directed st-graphs admitting an upward- (resp. upward-rightward-) planar L-drawing are exactly those admitting a bitonic (resp. monotonically increasing) st-ordering. We give a linear-time algorithm that computes a bitonic (resp. monotonically increasing) st-ordering of a planar st-graph or reports that there exists none.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

C-Planarity of Overlapping Clusterings Including Unions of Two Partitions

We show that clustered planarity with overlapping clusters as introduced by Didimo et al. can be solved in polynomial time if each cluster induces a connected subgraph. It can be solved in linear time if the set of clusters is the union of two partitions of the vertex set such that, for each cluster, both the cluster and its complement, induce connected subgraphs. Clustered planarity with overlapping clusters is NP-complete, even if restricted to instances where the underlying graph is 2-connected, the set of clusters is the union of two partitions and each cluster contains at most two connected components while their complements contain at most three connected components.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2016

Simultaneous Orthogonal Planarity

We introduce and study the $\textit{OrthoSEFE}-k$ problem: Given $k$ planar graphs each with maximum degree 4 and the same vertex set, do they admit an OrthoSEFE, that is, is there an assignment of the vertices to grid points and of the edges to paths on the grid such that the same edges in distinct graphs are assigned the same path and such that the assignment induces a planar orthogonal drawing of each of the $k$ graphs? We show that the problem is NP-complete for $k \geq 3$ even if the shared graph is a Hamiltonian cycle and has sunflower intersection and for $k \geq 2$ even if the shared graph consists of a cycle and of isolated vertices. Whereas the problem is polynomial-time solvable for $k=2$ when the union graph has maximum degree five and the shared graph is biconnected. Further, when the shared graph is biconnected and has sunflower intersection, we show that every positive instance has an OrthoSEFE with at most three bends per edge.

cs.CG↗