SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Sadia Afreen

Publications and source records attributed to Sadia Afreen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

LLMs in Code Vulnerability Analysis: A Proof of Concept

Context: Traditional software security analysis methods struggle to keep pace with the scale and complexity of modern codebases, requiring intelligent automation to detect, assess, and remediate vulnerabilities more efficiently and accurately. Objective: This paper explores the incorporation of code-specific and general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate critical software security tasks, such as identifying vulnerabilities, predicting severity and access complexity, and generating fixes as a proof of concept. Method: We evaluate five pairs of recent LLMs, including both code-based and general-purpose open-source models, on two recognized C/C++ vulnerability datasets, namely Big-Vul and Vul-Repair. Additionally, we compare fine-tuning and prompt-based approaches. Results: The results show that fine-tuning uniformly outperforms both zero-shot and few-shot approaches across all tasks and models. Notably, code-specialized models excel in zero-shot and few-shot settings on complex tasks, while general-purpose models remain nearly as effective. Discrepancies among CodeBLEU, CodeBERTScore, BLEU, and ChrF highlight the inadequacy of current metrics for measuring repair quality. Conclusions: This study contributes to the software security community by investigating the potential of advanced LLMs to improve vulnerability analysis and remediation.

cs.SE

Code Vulnerability Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Emerging Large Language Models

The growing trend of vulnerability issues in software development as a result of a large dependence on open-source projects has received considerable attention recently. This paper investigates the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in identifying vulnerabilities within codebases, with a focus on the latest advancements in LLM technology. Through a comparative analysis, we assess the performance of emerging LLMs, specifically Llama, CodeLlama, Gemma, and CodeGemma, alongside established state-of-the-art models such as BERT, RoBERTa, and GPT-3. Our study aims to shed light on the capabilities of LLMs in vulnerability detection, contributing to the enhancement of software security practices across diverse open-source repositories. We observe that CodeGemma achieves the highest F1-score of 58\ and a Recall of 87\, amongst the recent additions of large language models to detect software security vulnerabilities.

cs.SE

Survey and Analysis of IoT Operating Systems: A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness and Acquisition Time of Open Source Digital Forensics Tools

The main goal of this research project is to evaluate the effectiveness and speed of open-source forensic tools for digital evidence collecting from various Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices. The project will create and configure many IoT environments, across popular IoT operating systems, and run common forensics tasks in order to accomplish this goal. To validate these forensic analysis operations, a variety of open-source forensic tools covering four standard digital forensics tasks. These tasks will be utilized across each sample IoT operating system and will have its time spent on record carefully tracked down and examined, allowing for a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness and speed for performing forensics on each type of IoT device. The research also aims to offer recommendations to IoT security experts and digital forensic practitioners about the most efficient open-source tools for forensic investigations with IoT devices while maintaining the integrity of gathered evidence and identifying challenges that exist with these new device types. The results will be shared widely and well-documented in order to provide significant contributions to the field of internet-of-things device makers and digital forensics.

cs.CR

Healthcare Security Breaches in the United States: Insights and their Socio-Technical Implications

This research examines the pivotal role of human behavior in the realm of healthcare data management, situated at the confluence of technological advancements and human conduct. An in-depth analysis of security breaches in the United States from 2009 to the present elucidates the dominance of human-induced security breaches. While technological weak points are certainly a concern, our study highlights that a significant proportion of breaches are precipitated by human errors and practices, thus pinpointing a conspicuous deficiency in training, awareness, and organizational architecture. In spite of stringent federal mandates, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, breaches persist, emphasizing the indispensable role of human factors within this domain. Such oversights not only jeopardize patient data confidentiality but also undermine the foundational trust inherent in the healthcare infrastructure. By probing the socio-technical facets of healthcare security infringements, this article advocates for an integrated, dynamic, and holistic approach to healthcare data security. The findings underscore the imperative of augmenting technological defenses while concurrently elevating human conduct and institutional ethos, thereby cultivating a robust and impervious healthcare data management environment.

cs.CY